{"title":"Assessing nutrition risk and malnutrition rates in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Buse Sarıkaya, Şule Aktaç, Erdoğan Çetinkaya","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutrition screening is crucial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This study aimed to assess the nutritional status of patients with COPD at different severity levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 52 patients with COPD aged 50-80 years. COPD severity was classified according to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Nutritional status was assessed using a two-step approach: initial screening with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), followed by malnutrition diagnosis in at-risk individuals according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Body composition was assessed using the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MNA-SF identified 23.1% of patients as at risk, whereas GLIM diagnosed malnutrition in 13.5%. Compared to the well-nourished group, malnourished patients had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (21.4 ± 3.7 vs 26.8 ± 3.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; P < 0.05) and skeletal muscle mass (22.3 ± 3.3 vs 27.7 ± 3.2 kg; P < 0.05). Patients with severe COPD had lower BMI and fat-free mass index (FFMI) than those with moderate COPD (P < 0.05). Malnutrition was associated with prolonged hospital stays (7.7 ± 5.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 days; P < 0.05) and lower FEV<sub>1</sub> values (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MNA-SF does not consider disease-specific factors, whereas GLIM, despite incorporating muscle mass evaluation, is influenced by COPD-related complications. A comprehensive approach that accounts for COPD-related physiological changes is needed for accurate malnutrition assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"880-892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nutrition screening is crucial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This study aimed to assess the nutritional status of patients with COPD at different severity levels.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 52 patients with COPD aged 50-80 years. COPD severity was classified according to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Nutritional status was assessed using a two-step approach: initial screening with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), followed by malnutrition diagnosis in at-risk individuals according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Body composition was assessed using the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method.
Results: The MNA-SF identified 23.1% of patients as at risk, whereas GLIM diagnosed malnutrition in 13.5%. Compared to the well-nourished group, malnourished patients had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (21.4 ± 3.7 vs 26.8 ± 3.2 kg/m2; P < 0.05) and skeletal muscle mass (22.3 ± 3.3 vs 27.7 ± 3.2 kg; P < 0.05). Patients with severe COPD had lower BMI and fat-free mass index (FFMI) than those with moderate COPD (P < 0.05). Malnutrition was associated with prolonged hospital stays (7.7 ± 5.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 days; P < 0.05) and lower FEV1 values (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The MNA-SF does not consider disease-specific factors, whereas GLIM, despite incorporating muscle mass evaluation, is influenced by COPD-related complications. A comprehensive approach that accounts for COPD-related physiological changes is needed for accurate malnutrition assessment.
背景:营养筛查在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗中至关重要。本研究旨在评估不同严重程度COPD患者的营养状况。方法:本横断面研究纳入52例50-80岁COPD患者。使用全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)标准,根据1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)对COPD严重程度进行分类。营养状况的评估采用两步方法:首先使用迷你营养评估-简短表格(MNA-SF)进行初步筛选,然后根据全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)标准对高危个体进行营养不良诊断。采用生物电阻抗分析法(BIA)评估体成分。结果:MNA-SF识别出23.1%的患者存在风险,而GLIM诊断为13.5%的患者营养不良。与营养良好组相比,营养不良患者的身体质量指数(BMI)显著降低(21.4±3.7 vs 26.8±3.2 kg/m2;结论:MNA-SF不考虑疾病特异性因素,而GLIM尽管纳入了肌肉质量评估,但仍受copd相关并发症的影响。需要一种综合的方法来解释copd相关的生理变化,以准确评估营养不良。
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).