Assessing nutrition risk and malnutrition rates in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-18 DOI:10.1002/ncp.11331
Buse Sarıkaya, Şule Aktaç, Erdoğan Çetinkaya
{"title":"Assessing nutrition risk and malnutrition rates in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Buse Sarıkaya, Şule Aktaç, Erdoğan Çetinkaya","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutrition screening is crucial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This study aimed to assess the nutritional status of patients with COPD at different severity levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 52 patients with COPD aged 50-80 years. COPD severity was classified according to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Nutritional status was assessed using a two-step approach: initial screening with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), followed by malnutrition diagnosis in at-risk individuals according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Body composition was assessed using the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MNA-SF identified 23.1% of patients as at risk, whereas GLIM diagnosed malnutrition in 13.5%. Compared to the well-nourished group, malnourished patients had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (21.4 ± 3.7 vs 26.8 ± 3.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; P < 0.05) and skeletal muscle mass (22.3 ± 3.3 vs 27.7 ± 3.2 kg; P < 0.05). Patients with severe COPD had lower BMI and fat-free mass index (FFMI) than those with moderate COPD (P < 0.05). Malnutrition was associated with prolonged hospital stays (7.7 ± 5.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 days; P < 0.05) and lower FEV<sub>1</sub> values (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MNA-SF does not consider disease-specific factors, whereas GLIM, despite incorporating muscle mass evaluation, is influenced by COPD-related complications. A comprehensive approach that accounts for COPD-related physiological changes is needed for accurate malnutrition assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"880-892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nutrition screening is crucial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This study aimed to assess the nutritional status of patients with COPD at different severity levels.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 52 patients with COPD aged 50-80 years. COPD severity was classified according to forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Nutritional status was assessed using a two-step approach: initial screening with the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF), followed by malnutrition diagnosis in at-risk individuals according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Body composition was assessed using the bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method.

Results: The MNA-SF identified 23.1% of patients as at risk, whereas GLIM diagnosed malnutrition in 13.5%. Compared to the well-nourished group, malnourished patients had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) (21.4 ± 3.7 vs 26.8 ± 3.2 kg/m2; P < 0.05) and skeletal muscle mass (22.3 ± 3.3 vs 27.7 ± 3.2 kg; P < 0.05). Patients with severe COPD had lower BMI and fat-free mass index (FFMI) than those with moderate COPD (P < 0.05). Malnutrition was associated with prolonged hospital stays (7.7 ± 5.7 vs 5.8 ± 3.2 days; P < 0.05) and lower FEV1 values (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The MNA-SF does not consider disease-specific factors, whereas GLIM, despite incorporating muscle mass evaluation, is influenced by COPD-related complications. A comprehensive approach that accounts for COPD-related physiological changes is needed for accurate malnutrition assessment.

评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的营养风险和营养不良率:一项横断面研究
背景:营养筛查在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗中至关重要。本研究旨在评估不同严重程度COPD患者的营养状况。方法:本横断面研究纳入52例50-80岁COPD患者。使用全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)标准,根据1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)对COPD严重程度进行分类。营养状况的评估采用两步方法:首先使用迷你营养评估-简短表格(MNA-SF)进行初步筛选,然后根据全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)标准对高危个体进行营养不良诊断。采用生物电阻抗分析法(BIA)评估体成分。结果:MNA-SF识别出23.1%的患者存在风险,而GLIM诊断为13.5%的患者营养不良。与营养良好组相比,营养不良患者的身体质量指数(BMI)显著降低(21.4±3.7 vs 26.8±3.2 kg/m2;结论:MNA-SF不考虑疾病特异性因素,而GLIM尽管纳入了肌肉质量评估,但仍受copd相关并发症的影响。需要一种综合的方法来解释copd相关的生理变化,以准确评估营养不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信