Correction to “Unveiling Thrips Morphology: A Comparative Analysis of Microscopy Based Ultrastructural, Morphological, and Molecular Characterization of Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus in Onion”

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
{"title":"Correction to “Unveiling Thrips Morphology: A Comparative Analysis of Microscopy Based Ultrastructural, Morphological, and Molecular Characterization of Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus in Onion”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Arunkumar Pandi, Kannan Malaichamy, Kennedy John Samuel, et al., “Unveiling Thrips Morphology: A Comparative Analysis of Microscopy-Based Ultrastructural, Morphological, and Molecular Characterization of <i>Thrips tabaci</i> and <i>Thrips parvispinus</i> in Onion,” Microscopy Research and Technique 87, (2024): 3003–3015, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24653.</p><p>In the originally published article, there are several changes to the text and figures. They are detailed below.</p><p>\n <b>Abstract original text:</b>\n </p><p>\n \n <b>ABSTRACT</b>\n The present study unveils the intricate details on the morphology of thrips through optical, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) and mitochondrial COI gene based molecular identification tools. The variation in the morphological characters <i>viz</i>., antennae (7-segmented with forked sensorium on 3rd, 4th segments), ctenidia (paired ctenidia was present in 5-8 abdominal segments laterally), pronotum (2 pairs of posteroangular setae) were observed in both <i>Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus</i>, respectively. Similarly, ocelli colour (brown and red coloured), ocellar setae 2 and 3 pairs of ocellar setae on the head of <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>, respectively; irregular reticulate striations on metascutum and medial striations are present in the metanotum of <i>T. parvispinus</i>; forewings with 6 distal setae in the first vein and 15 distal setae in the second vein in <i>T. tabaci</i> and forewings of <i>T. parvispinus</i> with complete rows of setae in the 1st and 2nd vein in <i>T. parvispinus</i>; abdomen with median dorsal setae present in the tergite of <i>T. tabaci</i> and presence of 6–12 discal setae in sternites III-VI segments, absence of discal setae on sternites II &amp; VII in <i>T. parvispinus</i> were observed respectively. Further, FE-SEM studies revealed that similar type of sensilla viz., sensilla basiconica (SBI, SBII, SBIII), sensilla chaetica (SchI, SChII), sensilla trichodea (ST), sensilla campaniformia (SCa), and sensilla cavity (SCav) were recorded in both the species and variations were observed in length of above sensilla of <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>. Additionally, Bohm bristles (Bb) and microtrichia (Mt) on the antennal surface contributed to a comprehensive understanding of their ultrastructural features. The molecular characterization revealed a single ~450bp nucleotide fragment with over 98% similarity for the confirmation of <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i> in concurrence with NCBI data”. was incorrect.</p><p>\n <b>This should have read:</b> The present study unveils the intricate details on the morphology of thrips through optical, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and mitochondrial COI gene-based molecular identification tools. The variation in the morphological characters namely, antennae (7-segmented with forked sensorium on 3rd, 4th segments), ctenidia (paired ctenidia was present in 5–8 abdominal segments laterally), and pronotum (2 pairs of posteroangular setae) were observed in both <i>Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus</i>, respectively. Similarly, ocelli colour (brown and red coloured), and the number of ocellar setae present in <i>T. tabaci</i> was two pairs. In <i>T. parvispinus</i>, ocellar setae pair III was small, arising on the anterior margin of the ocellar triangle. Irregular reticulate striations on metanotum and medial striations are present in the metanotum of <i>T. parvispinus</i>; forewings with six distal setae in the first vein and 15 distal setae in the second vein in <i>T. tabaci</i>, and forewings of <i>T. parvispinus</i> with complete rows of setae in the 1st and 2nd veins in <i>T. parvispinus</i>; abdomen with median dorsal setae present in the tergite of <i>T. tabaci</i> and the presence of 6–12 discal setae in sternites III–VI segments, and the absence of discal setae on sternites II and VII in <i>T. parvispinus</i> were observed, respectively. Further, FE-SEM studies revealed that a similar type of sensilla namely, sensilla basiconica (SBI, SBII, SBIII), sensilla chaetica (SchI, SChII), sensilla trichodea (ST), sensilla campaniformia (SCa), and sensilla cavity (SCav) were recorded in both species, and variations were observed in the length of the above sensilla of <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>. Additionally, Bohm bristles (Bb) and microtrichia (Mt) on the antennal surface contributed to a comprehensive understanding of their ultrastructural features. The molecular characterization revealed a single ~450bp nucleotide fragment with over 98% similarity for the confirmation of <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i> in concurrence with NCBI data.</p><p>3 <b>\n RESULTS original text:</b>\n </p><p>3.1.2 Ocelli Colour and Setae</p><p>The results on the light microscopic study observed the head with peculiar brown ocelli (Figure 6e) and red ocelli (Figure 6f) in <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>, respectively. The FE-SEM results exposed the ocellar setae more clearly than a light microscope. The number of ocellar setae present in <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i> were two and three pairs, respectively. Similarly, the size was larger in <i>T. tabaci</i> (43.15 ± 0.62μm) (Figure 6a&amp;b) and smaller in <i>T. parvispinus</i> (22.56 ± 1.71μm) (Figure 6c&amp;d).</p><p>\n <b>This should have read:</b>\n </p><p>3.1.2 Ocelli Color and Setae</p><p>The results on the light microscopic study observed the head with peculiar brown ocelli (Figure 2e) and red ocelli (Figure 2f) in <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>, respectively. The FE-SEM results exposed the ocellar setae more clearly than a light microscope. The number of ocellar setae present in <i>T. tabaci</i> was two pairs. In <i>T. parvispinus</i>, ocellar setae pair III was small, arising on the anterior margin of the ocellar triangle. Similarly, the size was larger in <i>T. tabaci</i> (43.15 ± 0.62 μm) (Figure 2a,b) and smaller in <i>T. parvispinus</i> (22.56 ± 1.71 μm) (Figure 2c,d).</p><p>3.1.3 Pronotum and Reticulations</p><p>Both the microscopy techniques recorded two pairs (Figure 7a,b) and three pairs (Figure 7c,d) of posteroangular setae in the pronotum; the mean length was higher in <i>T. parvispinus</i> (38.94 ± 4.19 μm) compared to <i>T. tabaci</i> (22.56 ± 1.71 μm). Further reticulations (net like pattern or structure) were present on the metascutum with two pairs of median metanotal setae (Figure 8a,b) and metanotum without setae (Figure 8c,d) in <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>, respectively. The above structure was not clear in the light microscope, and FE-SEM exposed the structure clearly.</p><p>\n <b>This should have read:</b>\n </p><p>3.1.3 Pronotum and Reticulations</p><p>Both the microscopy techniques recorded pronotum with two pairs of posteroangular setae (Figure 3a,b) and three pairs of posteromarginal setae in <i>T. parvispinus</i> and <i>T. tabaci</i> (Figure 3c,d). The mean length was higher in <i>T. parvispinus</i> (38.94 ± 4.19 μm) compared with <i>T. tabaci</i> (22.56 ± 1.71 μm). Further, reticulations (net like pattern or structure) were present on metanotum with two pairs of median metanotal setae (Figure 4a,b) and metanotum with long median setae (Figure 4c,d) in <i>T. tabaci</i> and <i>T. parvispinus</i>, respectively. The above structure was not clear in light microscope, and FE-SEM exposed the structure clearly.</p><p>The correct Figures 4, 7, and 8 are shown below.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":"88 10","pages":"2843-2846"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jemt.24880","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.24880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arunkumar Pandi, Kannan Malaichamy, Kennedy John Samuel, et al., “Unveiling Thrips Morphology: A Comparative Analysis of Microscopy-Based Ultrastructural, Morphological, and Molecular Characterization of Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus in Onion,” Microscopy Research and Technique 87, (2024): 3003–3015, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24653.

In the originally published article, there are several changes to the text and figures. They are detailed below.

Abstract original text:

ABSTRACT The present study unveils the intricate details on the morphology of thrips through optical, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) and mitochondrial COI gene based molecular identification tools. The variation in the morphological characters viz., antennae (7-segmented with forked sensorium on 3rd, 4th segments), ctenidia (paired ctenidia was present in 5-8 abdominal segments laterally), pronotum (2 pairs of posteroangular setae) were observed in both Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus, respectively. Similarly, ocelli colour (brown and red coloured), ocellar setae 2 and 3 pairs of ocellar setae on the head of T. tabaci and T. parvispinus, respectively; irregular reticulate striations on metascutum and medial striations are present in the metanotum of T. parvispinus; forewings with 6 distal setae in the first vein and 15 distal setae in the second vein in T. tabaci and forewings of T. parvispinus with complete rows of setae in the 1st and 2nd vein in T. parvispinus; abdomen with median dorsal setae present in the tergite of T. tabaci and presence of 6–12 discal setae in sternites III-VI segments, absence of discal setae on sternites II & VII in T. parvispinus were observed respectively. Further, FE-SEM studies revealed that similar type of sensilla viz., sensilla basiconica (SBI, SBII, SBIII), sensilla chaetica (SchI, SChII), sensilla trichodea (ST), sensilla campaniformia (SCa), and sensilla cavity (SCav) were recorded in both the species and variations were observed in length of above sensilla of T. tabaci and T. parvispinus. Additionally, Bohm bristles (Bb) and microtrichia (Mt) on the antennal surface contributed to a comprehensive understanding of their ultrastructural features. The molecular characterization revealed a single ~450bp nucleotide fragment with over 98% similarity for the confirmation of T. tabaci and T. parvispinus in concurrence with NCBI data”. was incorrect.

This should have read: The present study unveils the intricate details on the morphology of thrips through optical, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and mitochondrial COI gene-based molecular identification tools. The variation in the morphological characters namely, antennae (7-segmented with forked sensorium on 3rd, 4th segments), ctenidia (paired ctenidia was present in 5–8 abdominal segments laterally), and pronotum (2 pairs of posteroangular setae) were observed in both Thrips tabaci and Thrips parvispinus, respectively. Similarly, ocelli colour (brown and red coloured), and the number of ocellar setae present in T. tabaci was two pairs. In T. parvispinus, ocellar setae pair III was small, arising on the anterior margin of the ocellar triangle. Irregular reticulate striations on metanotum and medial striations are present in the metanotum of T. parvispinus; forewings with six distal setae in the first vein and 15 distal setae in the second vein in T. tabaci, and forewings of T. parvispinus with complete rows of setae in the 1st and 2nd veins in T. parvispinus; abdomen with median dorsal setae present in the tergite of T. tabaci and the presence of 6–12 discal setae in sternites III–VI segments, and the absence of discal setae on sternites II and VII in T. parvispinus were observed, respectively. Further, FE-SEM studies revealed that a similar type of sensilla namely, sensilla basiconica (SBI, SBII, SBIII), sensilla chaetica (SchI, SChII), sensilla trichodea (ST), sensilla campaniformia (SCa), and sensilla cavity (SCav) were recorded in both species, and variations were observed in the length of the above sensilla of T. tabaci and T. parvispinus. Additionally, Bohm bristles (Bb) and microtrichia (Mt) on the antennal surface contributed to a comprehensive understanding of their ultrastructural features. The molecular characterization revealed a single ~450bp nucleotide fragment with over 98% similarity for the confirmation of T. tabaci and T. parvispinus in concurrence with NCBI data.

3 RESULTS original text:

3.1.2 Ocelli Colour and Setae

The results on the light microscopic study observed the head with peculiar brown ocelli (Figure 6e) and red ocelli (Figure 6f) in T. tabaci and T. parvispinus, respectively. The FE-SEM results exposed the ocellar setae more clearly than a light microscope. The number of ocellar setae present in T. tabaci and T. parvispinus were two and three pairs, respectively. Similarly, the size was larger in T. tabaci (43.15 ± 0.62μm) (Figure 6a&b) and smaller in T. parvispinus (22.56 ± 1.71μm) (Figure 6c&d).

This should have read:

3.1.2 Ocelli Color and Setae

The results on the light microscopic study observed the head with peculiar brown ocelli (Figure 2e) and red ocelli (Figure 2f) in T. tabaci and T. parvispinus, respectively. The FE-SEM results exposed the ocellar setae more clearly than a light microscope. The number of ocellar setae present in T. tabaci was two pairs. In T. parvispinus, ocellar setae pair III was small, arising on the anterior margin of the ocellar triangle. Similarly, the size was larger in T. tabaci (43.15 ± 0.62 μm) (Figure 2a,b) and smaller in T. parvispinus (22.56 ± 1.71 μm) (Figure 2c,d).

3.1.3 Pronotum and Reticulations

Both the microscopy techniques recorded two pairs (Figure 7a,b) and three pairs (Figure 7c,d) of posteroangular setae in the pronotum; the mean length was higher in T. parvispinus (38.94 ± 4.19 μm) compared to T. tabaci (22.56 ± 1.71 μm). Further reticulations (net like pattern or structure) were present on the metascutum with two pairs of median metanotal setae (Figure 8a,b) and metanotum without setae (Figure 8c,d) in T. tabaci and T. parvispinus, respectively. The above structure was not clear in the light microscope, and FE-SEM exposed the structure clearly.

This should have read:

3.1.3 Pronotum and Reticulations

Both the microscopy techniques recorded pronotum with two pairs of posteroangular setae (Figure 3a,b) and three pairs of posteromarginal setae in T. parvispinus and T. tabaci (Figure 3c,d). The mean length was higher in T. parvispinus (38.94 ± 4.19 μm) compared with T. tabaci (22.56 ± 1.71 μm). Further, reticulations (net like pattern or structure) were present on metanotum with two pairs of median metanotal setae (Figure 4a,b) and metanotum with long median setae (Figure 4c,d) in T. tabaci and T. parvispinus, respectively. The above structure was not clear in light microscope, and FE-SEM exposed the structure clearly.

The correct Figures 4, 7, and 8 are shown below.

We apologize for these errors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

修正“揭示蓟马形态:基于显微镜的烟草蓟马和洋葱蓟马的超微结构、形态和分子特征的比较分析”。
Arunkumar Pandi, Kannan Malaichamy, Kennedy John Samuel等,“揭示Thrips形态学:基于显微镜的Thrips tabaci和Thrips parvispinus在洋葱中的超微结构、形态和分子特征的比较分析”,显微研究与技术87,(2024):3003-3015,https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24653.In原发表文章,文本和图表有几处修改。详情如下。摘要本研究通过光学、场发射扫描电镜(FE-SEM)和基于线粒体COI基因的分子鉴定工具揭示了蓟马形态学的复杂细节。烟叶蓟马和小野蓟马在触角(7节,第3节和第4节有叉状感觉器)、栉虫(5 ~ 8个腹节中有成对栉虫)、前毛(2对后角刚毛)等形态特征上均存在差异。同样,眼毛颜色(棕色和红色),烟粉虱和小野虱的头部上分别有2对和3对眼毛;小野田鼠皮囊上有不规则的网状纹和内侧纹;烟粉虱的前翅在第一静脉中有6根远端刚毛,在第二静脉中有15根远端刚毛;小野虱的前翅在第一和第二静脉中有完整的刚毛排;烟粉虱的胸骨中有正中背刚毛,胸骨III-VI节段有6-12个盘状刚毛,而小藤虱的胸骨II和胸骨VII节段分别没有盘状刚毛。此外,FE-SEM研究表明,两种烟粉虱均具有相似的感受器类型,即基本感受器(SBI、SBII、SBIII)、chaetica感受器(SchI、SChII)、trichodea感受器(ST)、campaniformia感受器(SCa)和腔感受器(SCav),且上述感受器长度存在差异。此外,天线表面的Bohm刚毛(Bb)和微毛(Mt)有助于全面了解其超微结构特征。分子鉴定显示一个~450bp的单核苷酸片段,与NCBI数据一致,相似性超过98%,证实了烟粉虱和parvispinus。是不正确的。本研究通过光学、场发射扫描电镜(FE-SEM)和基于线粒体COI基因的分子鉴定工具揭示了蓟马形态学的复杂细节。烟叶蓟马和小野蓟马在触角(7节,第3、4节有叉状感觉器)、栉虫(5 ~ 8节腹侧有成对栉虫)和前毛(2对后角刚毛)的形态特征上均存在差异。同样,烟粉虱的胚轴颜色(棕色和红色)和胚轴刚毛的数量为两对。小野田鼠的子房刚毛第三对很小,长在子房三角的前缘。小野田鼠背积液上有不规则的网状条纹,内侧有不规则条纹;烟粉虱的前翅在第一脉上有6根远端刚毛,在第二脉上有15根远端刚毛;小野虱的前翅在第一脉和第二脉上有完整的刚毛排;我们观察到烟粉虱的腹部有正中背刚毛,胸骨III-VI节段有6-12个盘状刚毛,而小榄虱的胸骨II和胸骨VII节段没有盘状刚毛。此外,FE-SEM研究发现,两种昆虫均有相似类型的感受器,即基本感受器(SBI、SBII、SBIII)、chaetica感受器(SchI、SChII)、trichodea感受器(ST)、campaniformia感受器(SCa)和体腔感受器(SCav),且烟叶虱和小叶虱的上述感受器长度存在差异。此外,天线表面的Bohm刚毛(Bb)和微毛(Mt)有助于全面了解其超微结构特征。与NCBI数据一致,单个~450bp的核苷酸片段与烟粉虱的相似性超过98%结果:3.1.2眼晴的颜色和颜色光镜下观察到烟粉虱和小叶棘虱头部分别有特殊的棕色眼晴(图6e)和红色眼晴(图6f)。FE-SEM结果比光学显微镜更清楚地暴露了窖毛。烟粉虱和小野虱的子房刚毛数分别为2对和3对。 同样,烟粉虱的尺寸较大(43.15±0.62μm)(图6a& b),小叶蜱的尺寸较小(22.56±1.71μm)(图6c& d)。3.1.2眼晴的颜色和颜色在光镜下观察到烟粉虱和小叶棘虱头部分别有特殊的棕色眼晴(图2e)和红色眼晴(图2f)。FE-SEM结果比光学显微镜更清楚地暴露了窖毛。烟粉虱的子房刚毛数为2对。小野田鼠的子房刚毛第三对很小,长在子房三角的前缘。同样地,烟粉蜱的体毛尺寸较大(43.15±0.62 μm)(图2a,b),而小叶蜱的体毛尺寸较小(22.56±1.71 μm)(图2c,d)。3.1.3前角和网纹两种显微镜技术均在前角处记录到2对(图7a,b)和3对(图7c,d)后角刚毛;小叶螨的平均长度为38.94±4.19 μm,烟粉虱的平均长度为22.56±1.71 μm。在烟粉虱和小野虱中,有两对中间毛刚毛(图8a、b)和无毛刚毛(图8c、d)的掌膜上还存在进一步的网状结构(网状图案或结构)。上述结构在光镜下不清晰,FE-SEM清晰地暴露了该结构。这应该是:3.1.3前角和网状两种显微镜技术都记录了parvispinus和tabaci的前角有两对后角刚毛(图3a,b)和三对后缘刚毛(图3c,d)。小叶螨的平均体长(38.94±4.19 μm)高于烟粉虱(22.56±1.71 μm)。此外,烟粉虱和小野虱的中性毛上分别有两对中性毛(图4a,b)和长中性毛(图4c,d)的中性毛上存在网状(网状图案或结构)。光镜下未观察到上述结构,FE-SEM清晰地揭示了该结构。正确的图4、7和8如下所示。我们为这些错误道歉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信