The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-06-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S514080
Hatem H Alsaqqa
{"title":"The Themes Have to Be Considered in the Change Process Within Healthcare Organizations: Critical Analysis Review.","authors":"Hatem H Alsaqqa","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S514080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review is intended to scrutinize different articles' types and determine a suitable process, model or framework for successful change in healthcare organizations. An integrative review of the literature was conducted. The search strategy began with three electronic databases (EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and PubMed). Considering the inclusion criteria, published articles that examined the change process within the healthcare organizations in the timeframe between 2000 and 2023 were chosen. Results extraction and analysis were completed on all the included articles. The final sample for this review comprised 19 studies. Based on common meanings and vital issues, 8 main themes contributing to change in healthcare organizations were integrated and grouped into four main categories (process dimensions), two adjunct factors (strategic dimensions) and one mediating tool and a result category. The four main categories are readiness to change, team-building, tangible and intangible variables' characteristics and the two adjunct factors are the metaphor design and time perspective. In addition to technology as a mediating role for change and the scale of the change as a resulted outcome. In general, collections that emerged in this study could be useful for framing initiatives to arouse organizational change in healthcare. However, little is known about the relative significance of each acknowledged factor within the change process in healthcare organizations. Various methodological research is recommended for narrowing this gap. Before beginning the change process, ongoing studies should focus on the psychological features of organizational scales for healthcare contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"3433-3446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S514080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review is intended to scrutinize different articles' types and determine a suitable process, model or framework for successful change in healthcare organizations. An integrative review of the literature was conducted. The search strategy began with three electronic databases (EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and PubMed). Considering the inclusion criteria, published articles that examined the change process within the healthcare organizations in the timeframe between 2000 and 2023 were chosen. Results extraction and analysis were completed on all the included articles. The final sample for this review comprised 19 studies. Based on common meanings and vital issues, 8 main themes contributing to change in healthcare organizations were integrated and grouped into four main categories (process dimensions), two adjunct factors (strategic dimensions) and one mediating tool and a result category. The four main categories are readiness to change, team-building, tangible and intangible variables' characteristics and the two adjunct factors are the metaphor design and time perspective. In addition to technology as a mediating role for change and the scale of the change as a resulted outcome. In general, collections that emerged in this study could be useful for framing initiatives to arouse organizational change in healthcare. However, little is known about the relative significance of each acknowledged factor within the change process in healthcare organizations. Various methodological research is recommended for narrowing this gap. Before beginning the change process, ongoing studies should focus on the psychological features of organizational scales for healthcare contexts.

在医疗保健组织的变化过程中必须考虑的主题:关键分析审查。
本综述旨在仔细检查不同的文章类型,并确定医疗保健组织中成功变更的合适流程、模型或框架。对相关文献进行了综合综述。搜索策略开始于三个电子数据库(EBSCOhost, b谷歌Scholar和PubMed)。考虑到纳入标准,选择了审查2000年至2023年期间医疗保健组织内部变化过程的已发表文章。结果所有纳入文献均完成了提取和分析。本综述的最终样本包括19项研究。根据共同含义和关键问题,将有助于医疗保健组织变革的8个主题整合并分为四个主要类别(流程维度)、两个辅助因素(战略维度)以及一个中介工具和一个结果类别。四个主要类别是准备改变、团队建设、有形和无形变量的特征,两个辅助因素是隐喻设计和时间视角。此外,技术作为变革的中介作用,以及作为结果的变革规模。总的来说,本研究中出现的集合可能有助于制定倡议,以引起医疗保健领域的组织变革。然而,人们对医疗机构变革过程中每个公认因素的相对重要性知之甚少。建议进行各种方法研究以缩小这一差距。在开始改变过程之前,正在进行的研究应侧重于医疗保健背景下组织量表的心理特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信