Naturalistic use of psychedelics is associated with longitudinal improvements in anxiety and depression during global crisis times.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maria Bălăeţ, William Trender, Annalaura Lerede, Peter J Hellyer, Adam Hampshire
{"title":"Naturalistic use of psychedelics is associated with longitudinal improvements in anxiety and depression during global crisis times.","authors":"Maria Bălăeţ, William Trender, Annalaura Lerede, Peter J Hellyer, Adam Hampshire","doi":"10.1177/02698811251346729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health implications of COVID-19 drug use patterns are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data-driven clustering in a large citizen science cohort recruited agnostically to an interest in drug-use to categorise people according to common patterns of drug use and analysed their mental health symptoms (GAD-7 and PHQ-9 items), from recruitment prior to COVID-19 restrictions in 2020 (<i>N</i> = 242,260) to three follow-ups in 2020-2022 (<i>N</i> = 68,416). Mixed effects modelling examined how mental health scores related to drug-use clusters cross-sectionally and how changes in those scores longitudinally related to changes in consumption frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six common patterns of drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic, with cannabis cross cutting most of them. The majority of drug use clusters had worse average mental health scores relative to drug-naive individuals at all timepoints. The average mental health scores of those who used more drugs during the pandemic worsened over time relative to individual baselines. However, psychedelics and cannabis users showed average improvements in depression (β = -0.26 SD, 95% CI: -0.44, -0.08, <i>p</i> = 0.003), anxiety (β = -0.24 SD, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.06, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and overall mental health (β = -0.2 SD, 95% CI: -0.35, -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.01) from pre-pandemic to January 2022, becoming on par with the drug-naive group. This was not the case for cannabis-only users, whose worse mental health scores persisted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Those who used psychedelics may have experienced some improvements in mental health across the pandemic timeframe, which supports the idea that beneficial effects on mood and anxiety associated with these substances may extend beyond controlled conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811251346729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251346729","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health implications of COVID-19 drug use patterns are still unclear.

Methods: We used data-driven clustering in a large citizen science cohort recruited agnostically to an interest in drug-use to categorise people according to common patterns of drug use and analysed their mental health symptoms (GAD-7 and PHQ-9 items), from recruitment prior to COVID-19 restrictions in 2020 (N = 242,260) to three follow-ups in 2020-2022 (N = 68,416). Mixed effects modelling examined how mental health scores related to drug-use clusters cross-sectionally and how changes in those scores longitudinally related to changes in consumption frequencies.

Results: We identified six common patterns of drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic, with cannabis cross cutting most of them. The majority of drug use clusters had worse average mental health scores relative to drug-naive individuals at all timepoints. The average mental health scores of those who used more drugs during the pandemic worsened over time relative to individual baselines. However, psychedelics and cannabis users showed average improvements in depression (β = -0.26 SD, 95% CI: -0.44, -0.08, p = 0.003), anxiety (β = -0.24 SD, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.06, p = 0.007) and overall mental health (β = -0.2 SD, 95% CI: -0.35, -0.04, p = 0.01) from pre-pandemic to January 2022, becoming on par with the drug-naive group. This was not the case for cannabis-only users, whose worse mental health scores persisted.

Conclusion: Those who used psychedelics may have experienced some improvements in mental health across the pandemic timeframe, which supports the idea that beneficial effects on mood and anxiety associated with these substances may extend beyond controlled conditions.

在全球危机时期,自然地使用致幻剂与焦虑和抑郁的纵向改善有关。
背景:COVID-19药物使用模式对心理健康的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们在一个大型公民科学队列中采用数据驱动聚类方法,根据药物使用的共同模式对人群进行分类,并分析他们的心理健康症状(GAD-7和PHQ-9项目),从2020年COVID-19限制之前的招募(N = 242,260)到2020-2022年的三次随访(N = 68,416)。混合效应模型研究了心理健康得分与药物使用簇的横断面关系,以及这些得分的变化与消费频率的变化的纵向关系。结果:我们确定了COVID-19大流行期间的六种常见药物使用模式,其中大部分与大麻交叉。在所有时间点上,大多数吸毒组的平均心理健康得分都比没有吸毒的人差。与个人基线相比,在大流行期间使用更多药物的人的平均心理健康分数随着时间的推移而恶化。然而,从大流行前到2022年1月,迷幻药和大麻使用者在抑郁(β = -0.26 SD, 95% CI: -0.44, -0.08, p = 0.003)、焦虑(β = -0.24 SD, 95% CI: -0.41, -0.06, p = 0.007)和整体心理健康(β = -0.2 SD, 95% CI: -0.35, -0.04, p = 0.01)方面表现出平均改善,与未用药组持平。对于只吸食大麻的人来说,情况并非如此,他们的心理健康得分持续较差。结论:在大流行期间,使用致幻剂的人可能在心理健康方面有所改善,这支持了这样一种观点,即与这些物质相关的对情绪和焦虑的有益影响可能会超出受控条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信