Prediction of Sepsis after Endourologic Kidney Stone Surgery: A Machine Learning Approach.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hriday P Bhambhvani, Adithya Balasubramanian, Justin Lee, Richard Berman, Ojas Shah
{"title":"Prediction of Sepsis after Endourologic Kidney Stone Surgery: A Machine Learning Approach.","authors":"Hriday P Bhambhvani, Adithya Balasubramanian, Justin Lee, Richard Berman, Ojas Shah","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Sepsis secondary to urinary tract infection after kidney stone surgery is associated with considerable morbidity. Limited research examines the use of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to predict postoperative sepsis after endourologic procedures. We developed a machine learning (ML) model trained on demographic and clinical data to predict postoperative sepsis and better identify patients requiring preoperative optimization. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients undergoing ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a tertiary care center were identified. Postoperative sepsis was defined as Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores ≥2. Five supervised ML models were developed: elastic-net penalized logistic regression, random forest, neural network, support vector machine, and naïve Bayes. The dataset was partitioned into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets; fivefold cross-validation was employed. Models were assessed for accuracy, discrimination via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), calibration, and Brier score on the hold-out test set. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 382 patients with complete data from a total cohort of 2,938 patients undergoing stone surgery from 2020 to 2023 were included with a mean age of 59.9 years (standard deviation [SD] ±14.9). Mean HbA1c was 6.34% (SD ±1.39). 15.2% (58/382) of patients in the study group developed postoperative sepsis, however the overall sepsis rate was 3.1% in the total cohort. Random forest modeling achieved the best performance in the hold-out test set with 91% accuracy, 0.88 AUCROC, calibration slope of 1.26, calibration intercept of -0.21, and Brier score of 0.09. The five most important urosepsis predictors, in descending order, were preoperative hemoglobin, HbA1c, stone size, length of surgery, and body mass index. The random forest model may be accessed at https://urol.shinyapps.io/sepsis_predict/. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A random forest model performed well in predicting sepsis after kidney stone surgery. Our model may help guide preoperative surgical optimization and planning as well as postoperative monitoring, pending further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis secondary to urinary tract infection after kidney stone surgery is associated with considerable morbidity. Limited research examines the use of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to predict postoperative sepsis after endourologic procedures. We developed a machine learning (ML) model trained on demographic and clinical data to predict postoperative sepsis and better identify patients requiring preoperative optimization. Methods: Patients undergoing ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, or percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a tertiary care center were identified. Postoperative sepsis was defined as Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) scores ≥2. Five supervised ML models were developed: elastic-net penalized logistic regression, random forest, neural network, support vector machine, and naïve Bayes. The dataset was partitioned into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets; fivefold cross-validation was employed. Models were assessed for accuracy, discrimination via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), calibration, and Brier score on the hold-out test set. Results: A total of 382 patients with complete data from a total cohort of 2,938 patients undergoing stone surgery from 2020 to 2023 were included with a mean age of 59.9 years (standard deviation [SD] ±14.9). Mean HbA1c was 6.34% (SD ±1.39). 15.2% (58/382) of patients in the study group developed postoperative sepsis, however the overall sepsis rate was 3.1% in the total cohort. Random forest modeling achieved the best performance in the hold-out test set with 91% accuracy, 0.88 AUCROC, calibration slope of 1.26, calibration intercept of -0.21, and Brier score of 0.09. The five most important urosepsis predictors, in descending order, were preoperative hemoglobin, HbA1c, stone size, length of surgery, and body mass index. The random forest model may be accessed at https://urol.shinyapps.io/sepsis_predict/. Conclusions: A random forest model performed well in predicting sepsis after kidney stone surgery. Our model may help guide preoperative surgical optimization and planning as well as postoperative monitoring, pending further validation.

预测肾结石手术后脓毒症:机器学习方法。
导读:肾结石手术后继发尿路感染的脓毒症与相当高的发病率相关。有限的研究探讨了使用血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)来预测泌尿系统手术后脓毒症。我们开发了一种机器学习(ML)模型,该模型经过人口统计学和临床数据的训练,可以预测术后脓毒症,并更好地识别需要术前优化的患者。方法:在三级医疗中心接受输尿管镜检查、冲击波碎石术或经皮肾镜取石术的患者。术后脓毒症定义为全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分≥2。开发了五种监督机器学习模型:弹性网络惩罚逻辑回归、随机森林、神经网络、支持向量机和naïve贝叶斯。数据集被划分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%);采用五重交叉验证。评估模型的准确性,通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUCROC),校准和保留测试集的Brier评分来区分。结果:从2020年至2023年接受结石手术的2938例患者中,共纳入382例完整数据的患者,平均年龄为59.9岁(标准差[SD]±14.9)。平均HbA1c为6.34% (SD±1.39)。研究组中15.2%(58/382)的患者发生术后脓毒症,但总脓毒症发生率为3.1%。随机森林模型在保留测试集中表现最佳,准确率为91%,AUCROC为0.88,校准斜率为1.26,校准截距为-0.21,Brier评分为0.09。五个最重要的尿脓毒症预测因子,按降序依次为术前血红蛋白、糖化血红蛋白、结石大小、手术时间和体重指数。随机森林模型可以访问https://urol.shinyapps.io/sepsis_predict/。结论:随机森林模型可以很好地预测肾结石手术后的脓毒症。我们的模型可能有助于指导术前手术优化和计划以及术后监测,有待进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信