Jianxin Yu, Scott Citrowske, Jacob Strange, Nikki Carlson, Jeannette Polkinghorne
{"title":"Plasticizers Analysis in Extractables and Leachables by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry with Parallel Polyarc®/Flame Ionization Detector.","authors":"Jianxin Yu, Scott Citrowske, Jacob Strange, Nikki Carlson, Jeannette Polkinghorne","doi":"10.1093/chromsci/bmaf034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasticizers such as phthalate acid esters including di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and its alternatives are commonly found in extractables and leachables (E&Ls) from plastic-based medical devices. Regulatory agencies require manufacturers to monitor, qualify and quantify the E&Ls from medical devices to ensure the safety. Analyzing E&Ls from medical devices is difficult due to the unpredictability and complexity of matrices. The advent of the novel Polyarc/Flame Ionization Detector (FID), which features compound-independent response, provides the opportunity of quantitation of unknowns-to-be-identified E&Ls without using pure substances for establishing calibration. The present work evaluated firstly the feasibility and efficacy of full scan GC-MS with parallel Polyarc/FID system through analysis of plasticizers in E&Ls. In the same injection, E&Ls were identified by full scan GC-MS, then quantified through Polyarc/FID response factor of internal standards. The results showed that quantitation via response factor from internal standards are more accurate so the need for standards of the identified E&Ls is eliminated. The method can combine screening process and target analysis into a one-step execution, which makes it desirable for E&L analysis. The method was applied to a polyvinyl chloride medical device, yielding 1.183 g/device of acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate, 370.2 mg/device of trioctyltrimellitate, and 3.068 mg/device of DEHP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chromatographic science","volume":"63 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chromatographic science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmaf034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plasticizers such as phthalate acid esters including di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and its alternatives are commonly found in extractables and leachables (E&Ls) from plastic-based medical devices. Regulatory agencies require manufacturers to monitor, qualify and quantify the E&Ls from medical devices to ensure the safety. Analyzing E&Ls from medical devices is difficult due to the unpredictability and complexity of matrices. The advent of the novel Polyarc/Flame Ionization Detector (FID), which features compound-independent response, provides the opportunity of quantitation of unknowns-to-be-identified E&Ls without using pure substances for establishing calibration. The present work evaluated firstly the feasibility and efficacy of full scan GC-MS with parallel Polyarc/FID system through analysis of plasticizers in E&Ls. In the same injection, E&Ls were identified by full scan GC-MS, then quantified through Polyarc/FID response factor of internal standards. The results showed that quantitation via response factor from internal standards are more accurate so the need for standards of the identified E&Ls is eliminated. The method can combine screening process and target analysis into a one-step execution, which makes it desirable for E&L analysis. The method was applied to a polyvinyl chloride medical device, yielding 1.183 g/device of acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate, 370.2 mg/device of trioctyltrimellitate, and 3.068 mg/device of DEHP.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chromatographic Science is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning all methods of chromatographic analysis. The standard manuscript is a description of recent original research that covers any or all phases of a specific separation problem, principle, or method. Manuscripts which have a high degree of novelty and fundamental significance to the field of separation science are particularly encouraged. It is expected the authors will clearly state in the Introduction how their method compares in some markedly new and improved way to previous published related methods. Analytical performance characteristics of new methods including sensitivity, tested limits of detection or quantification, accuracy, precision, and specificity should be provided. Manuscripts which describe a straightforward extension of a known analytical method or an application to a previously analyzed and/or uncomplicated sample matrix will not normally be reviewed favorably. Manuscripts in which mass spectrometry is the dominant analytical method and chromatography is of marked secondary importance may be declined.