Health utilities in Alzheimer's disease: A survey of patients and caregivers in the United States.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pei-Jung Lin, Abigail G Riley, Patricia G Synnott, Terry L Frangiosa, Amber Roniger, Peter J Neumann, Joshua T Cohen
{"title":"Health utilities in Alzheimer's disease: A survey of patients and caregivers in the United States.","authors":"Pei-Jung Lin, Abigail G Riley, Patricia G Synnott, Terry L Frangiosa, Amber Roniger, Peter J Neumann, Joshua T Cohen","doi":"10.1177/13872877251350381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe introduction of new Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments necessitates updated health utilities for economic evaluations.ObjectiveMeasure health utilities of US adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD and their caregivers.MethodsWe conducted a web-based survey using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and Quality of Life in AD (QoL-AD), stratified by disease stage and care setting. Individuals with MCI or mild Alzheimer's dementia self-reported their utilities. Caregivers randomly received either a proxy survey to complete on behalf of the person with moderate to severe AD they cared for, or a caregiver survey that asked them to self-report their own utilities.ResultsWe received 241 patient responses and 176 caregiver responses. Patient EQ-5D-5L scores decreased monotonically as disease severity increased, with a 0.55 utility difference between individuals with MCI and severe AD in the community setting. EQ-5D-5L values were generally lower for individuals residing in nursing homes (0.04 to 0.78) compared to those in community settings (0.22 to 0.77). Patients' QoL-AD scores did not exhibit a consistent association with their disease severity. Similarly, caregivers' EQ-5D-5L scores did not exhibit a monotonic trend with the patient's disease severity, although caregiver utilities were generally higher for those caring for someone in a nursing home than for those caring for patients in the community.ConclusionsOur results contribute to improving AD economic evaluations by reflecting the lived experience of more contemporary populations and facilitating the value assessment of novel therapies that delay progression from MCI to more severe disease stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251350381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251350381","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe introduction of new Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments necessitates updated health utilities for economic evaluations.ObjectiveMeasure health utilities of US adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD and their caregivers.MethodsWe conducted a web-based survey using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and Quality of Life in AD (QoL-AD), stratified by disease stage and care setting. Individuals with MCI or mild Alzheimer's dementia self-reported their utilities. Caregivers randomly received either a proxy survey to complete on behalf of the person with moderate to severe AD they cared for, or a caregiver survey that asked them to self-report their own utilities.ResultsWe received 241 patient responses and 176 caregiver responses. Patient EQ-5D-5L scores decreased monotonically as disease severity increased, with a 0.55 utility difference between individuals with MCI and severe AD in the community setting. EQ-5D-5L values were generally lower for individuals residing in nursing homes (0.04 to 0.78) compared to those in community settings (0.22 to 0.77). Patients' QoL-AD scores did not exhibit a consistent association with their disease severity. Similarly, caregivers' EQ-5D-5L scores did not exhibit a monotonic trend with the patient's disease severity, although caregiver utilities were generally higher for those caring for someone in a nursing home than for those caring for patients in the community.ConclusionsOur results contribute to improving AD economic evaluations by reflecting the lived experience of more contemporary populations and facilitating the value assessment of novel therapies that delay progression from MCI to more severe disease stages.

阿尔茨海默病的健康效用:一项对美国患者和护理人员的调查。
背景:新的阿尔茨海默病(AD)治疗方法的引入需要更新的健康工具进行经济评估。目的了解美国轻度认知障碍(MCI)和AD患者及其照顾者的健康效用。方法采用EuroQol EQ-5D-5L和AD生活质量(QoL-AD)进行基于网络的调查,按疾病分期和护理环境进行分层。轻度认知障碍或轻度阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症患者自我报告了他们的公用事业。护理人员随机接受一份代理调查,代表他们所照顾的中度至重度AD患者完成,或者一份护理人员调查,要求他们自我报告自己的公用事业。结果共收到241份患者反馈和176份护理人员反馈。随着疾病严重程度的增加,患者EQ-5D-5L评分单调下降,社区环境中MCI患者和重度AD患者之间的效用差异为0.55。居住在养老院的个体EQ-5D-5L值(0.04 ~ 0.78)普遍低于社区环境中的个体(0.22 ~ 0.77)。患者的QoL-AD评分与疾病严重程度没有一致的关联。同样,照护者的EQ-5D-5L分数与病人的疾病严重程度并没有表现出单调的趋势,尽管在养老院照顾某人的照护者的效用通常高于在社区照顾病人的照护者。结论sour的研究结果反映了更多当代人群的生活经验,有助于提高AD的经济评估,并促进了延缓MCI向更严重疾病阶段进展的新疗法的价值评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信