Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: is it more valuable than CRP in assessing severity of acute diverticulitis at initial presentation? A single-center retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nurettin Sahin, Ahmet Surek, Turgut Donmez, Ferman Tevfik Ozyalvac, Emine Ayca Sahin, Sina Ferahman, Halil Kirazkaya, Muge Yurdacan, Mahmut Said Degerli, Sezer Bulut, Hamit Ahmet Kabuli, Alpen Yahya Gumusoglu
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: is it more valuable than CRP in assessing severity of acute diverticulitis at initial presentation? A single-center retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Nurettin Sahin, Ahmet Surek, Turgut Donmez, Ferman Tevfik Ozyalvac, Emine Ayca Sahin, Sina Ferahman, Halil Kirazkaya, Muge Yurdacan, Mahmut Said Degerli, Sezer Bulut, Hamit Ahmet Kabuli, Alpen Yahya Gumusoglu","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-03983-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of cheap, easily accessible, and simple biomarkers in determining the severity of diverticulitis according to the modified Hinchey classification.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups: complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis. Laboratory test results of the two groups were compared. The same patients were divided into two groups: operated and non-operated patients. Laboratory test results of these two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 335 patients. Two hundred twenty patients (65.7%) were classified as having uncomplicated diverticulitis, and 115 patients (34.3%) were classified as having complicated diverticulitis. For CRP, the sensitivity was 53.9%, and the specificity was 69.1% in distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis patients [AUC 0.648 (0.587-0.709)]. For NLR, the sensitivity was 80.9%, and the specificity was 58.6% [AUC 0.734 (0.678-0.791)]. Forty-nine patients (14.6%) were classified as having operated diverticulitis, and 286 patients (85.4%) were classified as having non-operated diverticulitis. For NLR, the sensitivity was 84.5%, and the specificity was 65.0% in distinguishing between operated and non-operated diverticulitis patients [AUC 0.789 (0.728-0.850)]. For CLR, the sensitivity was 85.7% and the specificity was 53.5% [AUC 0.735(0.664-0.805)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with acute diverticulitis, the NLR value is more successful than the CRP value in distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis. Similarly, it can effectively predict whether patients with acute diverticulitis will require surgery. In addition, the CLR value predicts the need for surgery in patients with acute diverticulitis with high sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-03983-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of cheap, easily accessible, and simple biomarkers in determining the severity of diverticulitis according to the modified Hinchey classification.

Method: Patients were divided into two groups: complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis. Laboratory test results of the two groups were compared. The same patients were divided into two groups: operated and non-operated patients. Laboratory test results of these two groups were compared.

Results: The study included 335 patients. Two hundred twenty patients (65.7%) were classified as having uncomplicated diverticulitis, and 115 patients (34.3%) were classified as having complicated diverticulitis. For CRP, the sensitivity was 53.9%, and the specificity was 69.1% in distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis patients [AUC 0.648 (0.587-0.709)]. For NLR, the sensitivity was 80.9%, and the specificity was 58.6% [AUC 0.734 (0.678-0.791)]. Forty-nine patients (14.6%) were classified as having operated diverticulitis, and 286 patients (85.4%) were classified as having non-operated diverticulitis. For NLR, the sensitivity was 84.5%, and the specificity was 65.0% in distinguishing between operated and non-operated diverticulitis patients [AUC 0.789 (0.728-0.850)]. For CLR, the sensitivity was 85.7% and the specificity was 53.5% [AUC 0.735(0.664-0.805)].

Conclusion: In patients with acute diverticulitis, the NLR value is more successful than the CRP value in distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated diverticulitis. Similarly, it can effectively predict whether patients with acute diverticulitis will require surgery. In addition, the CLR value predicts the need for surgery in patients with acute diverticulitis with high sensitivity.

中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:在评估急性憩室炎初始表现的严重程度时,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是否比CRP更有价值?单中心回顾性队列研究。
目的:我们的目的是评估廉价、容易获得和简单的生物标志物在根据修改的Hinchey分类确定憩室炎严重程度方面的有效性。方法:将患者分为并发症憩室炎和非并发症憩室炎两组。比较两组患者实验室检测结果。将同一组患者分为手术组和非手术组。比较两组实验室检测结果。结果:纳入335例患者。单纯憩室炎220例(65.7%),并发憩室炎115例(34.3%)。CRP在区分复杂性和非复杂性憩室炎患者中的敏感性为53.9%,特异性为69.1% [AUC为0.648(0.587-0.709)]。NLR的敏感性为80.9%,特异性为58.6% [AUC 0.734(0.678-0.791)]。手术性憩室炎49例(14.6%),非手术性憩室炎286例(85.4%)。NLR在区分手术与非手术憩室炎患者中的敏感性为84.5%,特异性为65.0% [AUC 0.789(0.728-0.850)]。对于CLR,敏感性为85.7%,特异性为53.5% [AUC 0.735(0.664-0.805)]。结论:在急性憩室炎患者中,NLR值比CRP值更能成功区分复杂性和非复杂性憩室炎。同样,它可以有效预测急性憩室炎患者是否需要手术。此外,CLR值预测敏感性高的急性憩室炎患者是否需要手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信