Good mental health for people with intellectual disabilities: a participatory focus group study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sophie Komenda-Schned, Sarah Jasmin Landskron, Paula Moritz, Nicole Braunstein, Josef Hochmeister, Karin Riegler, Robert Saugspier, Louise Hillenkamp, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Luis Salvador-Carulla, Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger
{"title":"Good mental health for people with intellectual disabilities: a participatory focus group study.","authors":"Sophie Komenda-Schned, Sarah Jasmin Landskron, Paula Moritz, Nicole Braunstein, Josef Hochmeister, Karin Riegler, Robert Saugspier, Louise Hillenkamp, Brigitte Lueger-Schuster, Luis Salvador-Carulla, Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02562-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health is a fundamental component of overall health. However, it remains unclear whether commonly accepted definitions of good mental health, like the WHO´s, are applicable to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). While there are studies with experts in the field of mental health and ID investigating this issue, the perspectives of people with ID themselves have yet to be adequately represented in this discourse.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to identify key factors contributing to good mental health in people with ID, based on the perspectives of people with ID as experts on their own account.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five focus groups with people with ID (N = 20) from different living and working settings were conducted. The data was analyzed and synthesized using reflexive thematic analysis. Following a participatory research approach, people with ID acted as co-researchers throughout the research process, including data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found six themes constituting good mental health in people with ID: (1) physical health, (2) working and living environment, (3) social contacts, (4) appropriate support, (5) competencies, and (6) psychosocial functioning. Psychosocial functioning included five sub-themes: (6a) emotions, (6b) self-determination and self-concept, (6c) doing something meaningful, (6d) responding well in social situations, and (6e) having energy and being able to relax.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings widely align with the factors outlined in the WHO definition of good mental health. While working productively as well as contributing to the community were not discussed, the relevance of social contacts and individualized support was emphasized. Additionally, this study underscores the added value of considering the unique perspectives of people with ID as experts on their own account and as co-researchers in participatory research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"180"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02562-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health is a fundamental component of overall health. However, it remains unclear whether commonly accepted definitions of good mental health, like the WHO´s, are applicable to people with intellectual disabilities (ID). While there are studies with experts in the field of mental health and ID investigating this issue, the perspectives of people with ID themselves have yet to be adequately represented in this discourse.

Aim: We aimed to identify key factors contributing to good mental health in people with ID, based on the perspectives of people with ID as experts on their own account.

Methods: Five focus groups with people with ID (N = 20) from different living and working settings were conducted. The data was analyzed and synthesized using reflexive thematic analysis. Following a participatory research approach, people with ID acted as co-researchers throughout the research process, including data analysis.

Results: We found six themes constituting good mental health in people with ID: (1) physical health, (2) working and living environment, (3) social contacts, (4) appropriate support, (5) competencies, and (6) psychosocial functioning. Psychosocial functioning included five sub-themes: (6a) emotions, (6b) self-determination and self-concept, (6c) doing something meaningful, (6d) responding well in social situations, and (6e) having energy and being able to relax.

Conclusions: The findings widely align with the factors outlined in the WHO definition of good mental health. While working productively as well as contributing to the community were not discussed, the relevance of social contacts and individualized support was emphasized. Additionally, this study underscores the added value of considering the unique perspectives of people with ID as experts on their own account and as co-researchers in participatory research settings.

智力残疾者的良好心理健康:一项参与性焦点小组研究。
背景:心理健康是整体健康的基本组成部分。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,普遍接受的良好心理健康的定义,如世界卫生组织的定义,是否适用于智障人士。虽然有心理健康和ID领域的专家对这个问题进行了研究,但ID患者本身的观点尚未在这一论述中得到充分体现。目的:我们的目的是根据ID患者作为专家自己的观点,确定有助于ID患者良好心理健康的关键因素。方法:对来自不同生活和工作环境的ID患者进行5个焦点小组(N = 20)的调查。运用自反性主题分析对数据进行分析和综合。遵循参与式研究方法,ID患者在整个研究过程中担任共同研究人员,包括数据分析。结果:我们发现了构成ID患者良好心理健康的六个主题:(1)身体健康,(2)工作和生活环境,(3)社会交往,(4)适当的支持,(5)能力,(6)心理社会功能。心理社会功能包括五个子主题:(6a)情绪,(6b)自决和自我概念,(6c)做有意义的事情,(6d)在社交场合反应良好,(6e)精力充沛,能够放松。结论:这些发现与世卫组织良好心理健康定义中概述的因素广泛一致。虽然没有讨论富有成效的工作以及对社区的贡献,但强调了社会接触和个性化支持的相关性。此外,这项研究强调了将ID患者作为自己的专家和参与性研究环境中的共同研究人员的独特视角考虑在内的附加价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信