Jurgis Alvikas, Ahmed Hamed, Nikhil Tirukkovalur, Sebastiaan Ceuppens, Adam Tcharni, Jiage Qian, Asmita Chopra, Genia Dubrovsky, Kenneth Lee, Amer Zureikat, Alessandro Paniccia
{"title":"Survival prediction for CA19-9 non-producers with resected pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Jurgis Alvikas, Ahmed Hamed, Nikhil Tirukkovalur, Sebastiaan Ceuppens, Adam Tcharni, Jiage Qian, Asmita Chopra, Genia Dubrovsky, Kenneth Lee, Amer Zureikat, Alessandro Paniccia","doi":"10.1016/j.hpb.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CA 19-9 is the most commonly used biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but prognostication is a challenge for patients with normal CA 19-9 levels. We aimed to define most important prognostic factors for overall survival in PDAC patients with normal range CA 19-9 levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective review of PDAC patients with CA 19-9 level at diagnosis <37 U/mL who underwent curative intent resection. Cohort was divided into CA 19-9 non-producers (CA 19-9 level of <3 U/mL) and normal range CA 19-9 (between 3 U/mL and 37 U/mL). We used a multivariable Cox regression model to define the predictors of overall survival and constructed a nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>271 patients were included (75 CA 19-9 non-producers and 196 with normal range CA 19-9). Non-producers had worse overall survival (27.2 months versus 33.6 months) and higher rate of recurrence after resection. Predictors of survival were CA 19-9 level, age, sex, lymph node ratio, perineural invasion, surgical margin status and adjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PDAC patients who are CA 19-9 non-producers have worse survival. Our findings highlight this high-risk subgroup, identify useful prognostic features and emphasize the ongoing need for improved biomarker development.</p>","PeriodicalId":13229,"journal":{"name":"Hpb","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hpb","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2025.05.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: CA 19-9 is the most commonly used biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) but prognostication is a challenge for patients with normal CA 19-9 levels. We aimed to define most important prognostic factors for overall survival in PDAC patients with normal range CA 19-9 levels.
Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of PDAC patients with CA 19-9 level at diagnosis <37 U/mL who underwent curative intent resection. Cohort was divided into CA 19-9 non-producers (CA 19-9 level of <3 U/mL) and normal range CA 19-9 (between 3 U/mL and 37 U/mL). We used a multivariable Cox regression model to define the predictors of overall survival and constructed a nomogram.
Results: 271 patients were included (75 CA 19-9 non-producers and 196 with normal range CA 19-9). Non-producers had worse overall survival (27.2 months versus 33.6 months) and higher rate of recurrence after resection. Predictors of survival were CA 19-9 level, age, sex, lymph node ratio, perineural invasion, surgical margin status and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Discussion: PDAC patients who are CA 19-9 non-producers have worse survival. Our findings highlight this high-risk subgroup, identify useful prognostic features and emphasize the ongoing need for improved biomarker development.
期刊介绍:
HPB is an international forum for clinical, scientific and educational communication.
Twelve issues a year bring the reader leading articles, expert reviews, original articles, images, editorials, and reader correspondence encompassing all aspects of benign and malignant hepatobiliary disease and its management. HPB features relevant aspects of clinical and translational research and practice.
Specific areas of interest include HPB diseases encountered globally by clinical practitioners in this specialist field of gastrointestinal surgery. The journal addresses the challenges faced in the management of cancer involving the liver, biliary system and pancreas. While surgical oncology represents a large part of HPB practice, submission of manuscripts relating to liver and pancreas transplantation, the treatment of benign conditions such as acute and chronic pancreatitis, and those relating to hepatobiliary infection and inflammation are also welcomed. There will be a focus on developing a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment with endoscopic and laparoscopic approaches, radiological interventions and surgical techniques being strongly represented. HPB welcomes submission of manuscripts in all these areas and in scientific focused research that has clear clinical relevance to HPB surgical practice.
HPB aims to help its readers - surgeons, physicians, radiologists and basic scientists - to develop their knowledge and practice. HPB will be of interest to specialists involved in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease however will also inform those working in related fields.
Abstracted and Indexed in:
MEDLINE®
EMBASE
PubMed
Science Citation Index Expanded
Academic Search (EBSCO)
HPB is owned by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and is also the official Journal of the American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA), the Asian-Pacific Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Association (A-PHPBA) and the European-African Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).