Hidden in Plain Sight: A Scoping Review of Professional Grief in Healthcare and Charting a Path for Change.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251344772
Carolyn S Phillips, Katie Trainum, Megan C Thomas Hebdon
{"title":"Hidden in Plain Sight: A Scoping Review of Professional Grief in Healthcare and Charting a Path for Change.","authors":"Carolyn S Phillips, Katie Trainum, Megan C Thomas Hebdon","doi":"10.1177/11786329251344772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare workers frequently experience emotional distress from repeated exposure to patient death, yet professional grief remains poorly recognized and inadequately supported. The COVID-19 pandemic further magnified these challenges, bringing professional grief into sharper focus. The purpose of this scoping review was to comprehensively examine professional grief among healthcare workers (HCWs) across different professions and specialties, map existing literature, identify research gaps, and provide educational, clinical, and policy recommendations. This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for literature from 2004 to 2024. Studies were screened based on inclusion criteria focusing on professional grief experiences of HCWs dealing with patient deaths. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies were included. Eighty-one publications were reviewed, with most studies published since 2020, highlighting increased attention post-COVID-19. Key findings identified significant individual (eg, early career vulnerability, lack of formal education), interpersonal (eg, patient demographics, relationship quality), and systemic factors (eg, emotional suppression culture, workload constraints) influencing professional grief. Existing interventions were predominantly peer-based and lacked demonstrated efficacy in reducing grief intensity. Measurement inconsistencies revealed discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative assessments of grief intensity, indicating a need for specialized measurement tools tailored to professional contexts. Professional grief among HCWs is multifaceted and deeply influenced by cultural, educational, and systemic barriers. Comprehensive strategies addressing these barriers must include structured educational curricula, ongoing clinical support programs, validated grief measurement tools, and institutional policies promoting open emotional expression. These approaches are essential to fostering resilience, enhancing professional well-being, and improving patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251344772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251344772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare workers frequently experience emotional distress from repeated exposure to patient death, yet professional grief remains poorly recognized and inadequately supported. The COVID-19 pandemic further magnified these challenges, bringing professional grief into sharper focus. The purpose of this scoping review was to comprehensively examine professional grief among healthcare workers (HCWs) across different professions and specialties, map existing literature, identify research gaps, and provide educational, clinical, and policy recommendations. This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for literature from 2004 to 2024. Studies were screened based on inclusion criteria focusing on professional grief experiences of HCWs dealing with patient deaths. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies were included. Eighty-one publications were reviewed, with most studies published since 2020, highlighting increased attention post-COVID-19. Key findings identified significant individual (eg, early career vulnerability, lack of formal education), interpersonal (eg, patient demographics, relationship quality), and systemic factors (eg, emotional suppression culture, workload constraints) influencing professional grief. Existing interventions were predominantly peer-based and lacked demonstrated efficacy in reducing grief intensity. Measurement inconsistencies revealed discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative assessments of grief intensity, indicating a need for specialized measurement tools tailored to professional contexts. Professional grief among HCWs is multifaceted and deeply influenced by cultural, educational, and systemic barriers. Comprehensive strategies addressing these barriers must include structured educational curricula, ongoing clinical support programs, validated grief measurement tools, and institutional policies promoting open emotional expression. These approaches are essential to fostering resilience, enhancing professional well-being, and improving patient care outcomes.

隐藏在平淡的视线:医疗保健专业悲伤的范围审查和绘制改变的路径。
卫生保健工作者经常因反复接触病人死亡而经历情绪困扰,但专业悲伤仍然得不到充分认识和支持。2019冠状病毒病大流行进一步放大了这些挑战,使职业悲痛更加突出。本综述的目的是全面检查不同专业和专业的医护人员(HCWs)的职业悲伤,绘制现有文献,确定研究差距,并提供教育、临床和政策建议。这次范围审查遵循了Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架和PRISMA-ScR指南。检索的数据库包括PubMed、CINAHL和PsycINFO,检索2004年至2024年的文献。研究是根据纳入标准筛选的,重点是处理病人死亡的卫生保健工作者的专业悲伤经历。包括定性、定量和混合方法研究。审查了81份出版物,其中大多数研究发表于2020年以后,凸显了covid -19后的关注增加。主要发现确定了影响职业悲伤的重要个体因素(如早期职业脆弱性、缺乏正规教育)、人际因素(如患者人口统计学、关系质量)和系统因素(如情绪抑制文化、工作量限制)。现有的干预措施主要是基于同伴的,在减少悲伤强度方面缺乏证明的有效性。测量的不一致性揭示了悲伤强度的定性和定量评估之间的差异,表明需要针对专业背景定制专门的测量工具。医护人员的职业悲伤是多方面的,深受文化、教育和体制障碍的影响。解决这些障碍的综合策略必须包括结构化的教育课程、持续的临床支持计划、有效的悲伤测量工具和促进开放情感表达的制度政策。这些方法对于培养韧性、增强专业幸福感和改善患者护理结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信