Retrospective validation of the postnatal growth and retinopathy of prematurity criteria in a Chinese cohort.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1509106
Li Li, Yanlin Gao, Yuhan Lu, Wei Chen, Mei Han
{"title":"Retrospective validation of the postnatal growth and retinopathy of prematurity criteria in a Chinese cohort.","authors":"Li Li, Yanlin Gao, Yuhan Lu, Wei Chen, Mei Han","doi":"10.3389/fped.2025.1509106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of the postnatal growth and retinopathy of prematurity (G-ROP) screening criteria in a Chinese neonatal cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data pertaining to the retinal screening of premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from January 2021 through December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The severity of ROP was graded on the basis of the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity criteria established in 2005. Treatment decisions for ROP were guided by the recommendations of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. The presence of six key variables that comprise the G-ROP screening criteria were carefully documented. The sensitivity and specificity of the G-ROP predictive algorithm in identifying infants with ROP requiring treatment were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 352 infants with complete records were included in this study, among whom 120 infants (34.1%) were diagnosed with ROP. Of those, 21 infants (6.0%) received treatment. By applying the 6 criteria of the G-ROP model, all infants with severe ROP were successfully identified. The sensitivity of the G-ROP model in predicting treatment-requiring ROP was 100% (CI, 0.808-1.00), and the specificity was 47.8% (CI, 0.413-0.545). By applying the G-ROP criteria, the number of infants who required ROP screening would have been reduced by 122 (34.7%), while the number of screenings (1967) would have been reduced by 537 (27.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of ROP (34.1%) and treatment-requiring ROP (6.0%) were relatively high in our cohort. Application of the G-ROP prediction model can improve the sensitivity and specificity of ROP screening. All infants with treatment-requiring ROP were correctly identified. The G-ROP screening criteria seemed to be effective and appropriate for predicting ROP in infants living in Tianjin, China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"13 ","pages":"1509106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1509106","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of the postnatal growth and retinopathy of prematurity (G-ROP) screening criteria in a Chinese neonatal cohort.

Methods: Data pertaining to the retinal screening of premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from January 2021 through December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The severity of ROP was graded on the basis of the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity criteria established in 2005. Treatment decisions for ROP were guided by the recommendations of the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. The presence of six key variables that comprise the G-ROP screening criteria were carefully documented. The sensitivity and specificity of the G-ROP predictive algorithm in identifying infants with ROP requiring treatment were calculated.

Results: A total of 352 infants with complete records were included in this study, among whom 120 infants (34.1%) were diagnosed with ROP. Of those, 21 infants (6.0%) received treatment. By applying the 6 criteria of the G-ROP model, all infants with severe ROP were successfully identified. The sensitivity of the G-ROP model in predicting treatment-requiring ROP was 100% (CI, 0.808-1.00), and the specificity was 47.8% (CI, 0.413-0.545). By applying the G-ROP criteria, the number of infants who required ROP screening would have been reduced by 122 (34.7%), while the number of screenings (1967) would have been reduced by 537 (27.3%).

Conclusion: The prevalence of ROP (34.1%) and treatment-requiring ROP (6.0%) were relatively high in our cohort. Application of the G-ROP prediction model can improve the sensitivity and specificity of ROP screening. All infants with treatment-requiring ROP were correctly identified. The G-ROP screening criteria seemed to be effective and appropriate for predicting ROP in infants living in Tianjin, China.

中国队列出生后生长和早产儿视网膜病变标准的回顾性验证。
目的:评价出生后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)筛查标准在中国新生儿队列中的有效性和适用性。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2021年12月入住新生儿重症监护病房的早产儿视网膜筛查数据。ROP的严重程度是根据2005年建立的国际早产儿视网膜病变分类标准进行分级的。早产儿视网膜病变早期治疗协作组的建议指导ROP的治疗决策。仔细记录了构成G-ROP筛选标准的六个关键变量。计算G-ROP预测算法识别需要治疗的ROP患儿的敏感性和特异性。结果:本研究共纳入352例记录完整的患儿,其中诊断为ROP的患儿120例(34.1%)。其中,21名婴儿(6.0%)接受了治疗。应用G-ROP模型的6项标准,成功识别出所有重度ROP患儿。G-ROP模型预测治疗所需ROP的敏感性为100% (CI, 0.808-1.00),特异性为47.8% (CI, 0.413-0.545)。通过应用G-ROP标准,需要ROP筛查的婴儿数量将减少122例(34.7%),而筛查次数(1967年)将减少537例(27.3%)。结论:本组患者ROP患病率(34.1%)和需治疗性ROP患病率(6.0%)较高。应用G-ROP预测模型可提高ROP筛选的敏感性和特异性。所有需要治疗的ROP患儿均被正确识别。G-ROP筛查标准对于预测中国天津的婴儿ROP似乎是有效和合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信