The relationship between positive future thinking, entrapment, defeat and death-related mental imagery in individuals with and without a suicidal history: an experimental study.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574315
Gonca Köse, Jonathan J Evans, Rory C O'Connor
{"title":"The relationship between positive future thinking, entrapment, defeat and death-related mental imagery in individuals with and without a suicidal history: an experimental study.","authors":"Gonca Köse, Jonathan J Evans, Rory C O'Connor","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there is growing evidence that impaired positive future thinking is associated with suicide risk, the relationship between positive future thinking and suicidal thoughts or suicidal behaviours has yet to be completely understood. Therefore, this experimental study explored the role of positive future thinking in those with different suicidal histories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three adults were recruited to a study, which included completing a range of self-reported measures (suicidal history, suicide ideation, defeat, entrapment, depression, and death-related mental imagery) and experimental tasks (verbal fluency or cognitive performance task, positive future thinking task and positive-and negative-mood induction). The study compared 30 individuals who had a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours and 23 with no suicidal history in terms of positive future thinking before and after a negative mood induction and on established psychological markers of suicide risk (e.g., depression, defeat, entrapment, and death-related mental imagery).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours reported significantly fewer positive future thoughts (PFT) than participants without past suicidal thoughts/behaviours. Mean scores for PFT from pre-to post-negative mood induction decreased significantly in the participants with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours but not in those without a suicidal history. Individuals with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours reported significantly higher levels of death-related mental imagery, depression, entrapment, and defeat compared to those without past suicidal thoughts/behaviours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides experimental evidence that positive future thinking is implicated in the suicidal process. In addition, positive future thinking is affected by a negative mood induction, especially in individuals with a suicidal history. Changes in positive future thinking could be usefully assessed in clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1574315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1574315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although there is growing evidence that impaired positive future thinking is associated with suicide risk, the relationship between positive future thinking and suicidal thoughts or suicidal behaviours has yet to be completely understood. Therefore, this experimental study explored the role of positive future thinking in those with different suicidal histories.

Methods: Fifty-three adults were recruited to a study, which included completing a range of self-reported measures (suicidal history, suicide ideation, defeat, entrapment, depression, and death-related mental imagery) and experimental tasks (verbal fluency or cognitive performance task, positive future thinking task and positive-and negative-mood induction). The study compared 30 individuals who had a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours and 23 with no suicidal history in terms of positive future thinking before and after a negative mood induction and on established psychological markers of suicide risk (e.g., depression, defeat, entrapment, and death-related mental imagery).

Results: Participants with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours reported significantly fewer positive future thoughts (PFT) than participants without past suicidal thoughts/behaviours. Mean scores for PFT from pre-to post-negative mood induction decreased significantly in the participants with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours but not in those without a suicidal history. Individuals with a history of suicidal thoughts/behaviours reported significantly higher levels of death-related mental imagery, depression, entrapment, and defeat compared to those without past suicidal thoughts/behaviours.

Conclusion: This study provides experimental evidence that positive future thinking is implicated in the suicidal process. In addition, positive future thinking is affected by a negative mood induction, especially in individuals with a suicidal history. Changes in positive future thinking could be usefully assessed in clinical contexts.

在有和没有自杀史的个体中积极的未来思考、诱捕、失败和死亡相关的心理意象之间的关系:一项实验研究。
背景:尽管越来越多的证据表明,受损的积极未来思维与自杀风险有关,但积极未来思维与自杀想法或自杀行为之间的关系尚不完全清楚。因此,本实验研究探讨了积极未来思维在不同自杀史人群中的作用。方法:研究招募了53名成年人,包括完成一系列自我报告的测量(自杀史、自杀意念、失败、诱捕、抑郁和死亡相关的心理意象)和实验任务(语言流畅性或认知表现任务、积极未来思考任务和积极和消极情绪诱导)。该研究比较了30名有自杀念头/行为史的人和23名没有自杀史的人在消极情绪诱导前后的积极未来思维,以及自杀风险的既定心理标志(如抑郁、失败、诱捕和死亡相关的心理意象)。结果:有自杀念头/行为史的参与者报告的积极未来想法(PFT)明显少于没有自杀念头/行为的参与者。在有自杀念头/行为史的参与者中,从消极情绪诱导前到消极情绪诱导后的PFT平均得分显著下降,而在没有自杀史的参与者中则没有。与没有自杀念头/行为的个体相比,有自杀念头/行为史的个体报告的死亡相关心理意象、抑郁、诱捕和失败的水平明显更高。结论:本研究提供了积极未来思维与自杀过程相关的实验证据。此外,积极的未来思维受到消极情绪诱导的影响,特别是在有自杀史的个体中。积极未来思维的变化可以在临床环境中有效地评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信