{"title":"Current state-of-the-art of immunotherapy in follicular lymphoma.","authors":"Sean McKeague, Phil Thompson, John F Seymour","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2522956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The advent of immunotherapy has rapidly changed the treatment landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor <i>T</i>- cell (CAR-T) products show unprecedented efficacy in 3<sup>rd</sup> line FL but substantial rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Bispecific antibodies (BSAB) achieve deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated FL patients with less severe CRS and minimal neurological toxicity. BSAB have differing routes of administration, treatment duration and CRS prophylaxis. Checkpoint inhibitors show disappointing response rates in FL. Lenalidomide and tazametostat have modest single agent activity in FL, but synergize with other forms of immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>CAR-T offers a short duration of therapy with a potential plateau in progression free survival. Major disadvantages include cost, availability, requirement for lymphodepletion and toxicity. BSAB are available 'off the shelf,' have a comparably lower toxicity profile and are ripe for combination. With both platforms, there are significant infectious risks. There are unanswered questions regarding when to use immunotherapy for FL, impact of disease burden, role of re-treatment and optimal sequencing/combinations. Moving forward, the field will need to develop new prognostic markers, reassess treatment indications and focus on minimizing toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2522956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The advent of immunotherapy has rapidly changed the treatment landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL).
Areas covered: Autologous CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T- cell (CAR-T) products show unprecedented efficacy in 3rd line FL but substantial rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Bispecific antibodies (BSAB) achieve deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated FL patients with less severe CRS and minimal neurological toxicity. BSAB have differing routes of administration, treatment duration and CRS prophylaxis. Checkpoint inhibitors show disappointing response rates in FL. Lenalidomide and tazametostat have modest single agent activity in FL, but synergize with other forms of immunotherapy.
Expert opinion: CAR-T offers a short duration of therapy with a potential plateau in progression free survival. Major disadvantages include cost, availability, requirement for lymphodepletion and toxicity. BSAB are available 'off the shelf,' have a comparably lower toxicity profile and are ripe for combination. With both platforms, there are significant infectious risks. There are unanswered questions regarding when to use immunotherapy for FL, impact of disease burden, role of re-treatment and optimal sequencing/combinations. Moving forward, the field will need to develop new prognostic markers, reassess treatment indications and focus on minimizing toxicity.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.