{"title":"An evaluation of Nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of resectable stage III melanoma.","authors":"Alistair McCombe, Alexander C J van Akkooi","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2522944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Twenty years ago, surgery was the centerpiece of treatment for cutaneous melanoma, including for resectable stage III and IV patients. The arrival of effective systemic therapies in the early 2010s has led to the abandonment of less effective traditional chemotherapeutic agents, a reduction in surgical excision margins, and a smaller set of indications for lymph node dissection. A more recent shift has been from adjuvant to neo-adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable macroscopic stage III melanoma. The speed at which the field is progressing, and the frequency of important publications on the topic, mean that regular review articles are useful to the scientific and wider community to keep abreast of this rapidly changing environment. PubMed and Cochrane databases were used to perform the literature search.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We have contextualized the emergence of ipilimumab and nivolumab in the adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatment of resectable stage III melanoma with discussion of pivotal studies, and how they influence the current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The future is looking brighter for patients with Stage III melanoma. The pendulum has swung away from radical surgery, and toward less invasive procedures and bespoke systemic treatment options based on tumor characteristics, patient factors, and response to neo-adjuvant therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2522944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Twenty years ago, surgery was the centerpiece of treatment for cutaneous melanoma, including for resectable stage III and IV patients. The arrival of effective systemic therapies in the early 2010s has led to the abandonment of less effective traditional chemotherapeutic agents, a reduction in surgical excision margins, and a smaller set of indications for lymph node dissection. A more recent shift has been from adjuvant to neo-adjuvant immunotherapy for resectable macroscopic stage III melanoma. The speed at which the field is progressing, and the frequency of important publications on the topic, mean that regular review articles are useful to the scientific and wider community to keep abreast of this rapidly changing environment. PubMed and Cochrane databases were used to perform the literature search.
Areas covered: We have contextualized the emergence of ipilimumab and nivolumab in the adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatment of resectable stage III melanoma with discussion of pivotal studies, and how they influence the current guidelines.
Expert opinion: The future is looking brighter for patients with Stage III melanoma. The pendulum has swung away from radical surgery, and toward less invasive procedures and bespoke systemic treatment options based on tumor characteristics, patient factors, and response to neo-adjuvant therapy.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.