Comparison between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles coronary artery disease and stroke patients: a meta-analysis.

Abstract

Background: It is suggested that in patients with coronary artery diseases (CAD) and stroke, the use of ticagrelor and aspirin may perform better than clopidogrel and aspirin regarding the risk of thrombosis/embolism, including recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular death, especially in those carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles. Therefore, we conducted the present systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in CAD and stroke patients with CYP2C19 LOF alleles (poor metabolizers of clopidogrel).

Methods: We performed the current systematic review and meta-analysis by searching for all eligible publications on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to November 2024. A search strategy employing three primary keywords in conjunction with their corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: "Ticagrelor" AND "Clopidogrel" AND "CYP2C19" (PROSPERO ID CRD420251050533). We implemented the odds ratio (OR) as an effect estimate for the dichotomous variables. The analysis was done at 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the p-value was significant if it was less than or equal to 0.05.

Results: Using clopidogrel was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis/embolism compared with ticagrelor, showing OR = 1.78 (95%CI, 1.08, 2.95; p = 0.02). Also, clopidogrel led to an increased risk of stroke, whether when used in stroke or CAD patients with CYP2C19 LOF alleles, compared with ticagrelor, with an overall OR = 1.43 (95%CI, 1.23, 1.66; p < 0.00001) and a higher rate of MI with OR = 1.53 (95%CI, 1.22, 1.92; p = 0.0003). No significant difference was observed between the two groups (clopidogrel and ticagrelor) in stroke or CAD patients with OR = 0.98 (95%CI, 0.79, 1.22; p = 0.87). Also, no significant difference was observed between both groups regarding the risk of minor bleeding in stroke or CAD patients with OR = 0.66 (95%CI, 0.42, 1.05; p = 0.08) and any types of bleeding (major or minor bleeding) with overall OR = 0.81 (95%CI, 0.54, 1.21; p = 0.3) and I² = 88%, p < 0.00001.

Conclusion: The meta-analysis of the selected articles indicated a preference for ticagrelor over clopidogrel in patients with stroke or CAD possessing CYP2C19 LOF alleles. The reduced incidence of thrombosis/embolism and associated events, such as stroke and MI, was noted in individuals administered ticagrelor in comparison to those receiving clopidogrel. Bleeding remains a concern with ticagrelor; however, current studies indicate its safety since there are no significant changes in the risk of minor and major bleeding and ICH compared to clopidogrel.