Contrast-enhanced CT-based prediction models for early intervention efficacy and in-hospital mortality risk in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with persistent organ failure.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Minchun Bu, Yun Zhang, Faxi Chen, Xiaochun Xie, Kaiming Li, Bo Ye, Lu Ke, Zhihui Tong, Weiqin Li, Gang Li
{"title":"Contrast-enhanced CT-based prediction models for early intervention efficacy and in-hospital mortality risk in acute necrotizing pancreatitis with persistent organ failure.","authors":"Minchun Bu, Yun Zhang, Faxi Chen, Xiaochun Xie, Kaiming Li, Bo Ye, Lu Ke, Zhihui Tong, Weiqin Li, Gang Li","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11766-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop contrast-enhanced CT-based nomograms for predicting early intervention efficacy and in-hospital mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) with persistent organ failure (POF).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 164 ANP patients with POF (110 in the training cohort, 54 in the validation cohort). The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was used to evaluate organ dysfunction severity. Contrast-enhanced CT parameters included mean and range CT numbers (HU) of acute necrotic collections (ANC) across anatomical regions, as well as pancreatic necrosis volume (PNV). LASSO regression identified predictors for early intervention efficacy and mortality. Nomograms were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early intervention efficacy predictors included intra-abdominal pressure, cardiovascular hemodynamic changes, and PNV increase. The model demonstrated good predictive performance, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.769-0.927) in the training cohort and 0.796 (95% CI: 0.644-0.947) in the validation cohort. In-hospital mortality predictors were SOFA score, cardiovascular hemodynamic changes, mean CT number of ANC at the right anterior pararenal space, and CT number range at the left paracolic gutter. The model showed AUCs of 0.918 (training cohort, 95% CI: 0.864-0.971) and 0.860 (validation cohort, 95% CI: 0.801-0.919).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ANP patients with intra-abdominal hypertension or significant PNV increase who maintain cardiovascular hemodynamic stability are more likely to benefit from early intervention. An elevated SOFA score, persistent cardiovascular failure, and ANC with poor homogeneity or drainage difficulty are risk factors for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question The optimal timing for early invasive intervention remains controversial in ANP with POF. Findings Nomogram models integrating organ dysfunction severity and contrast-enhanced CT imaging features can predict treatment response and clinical outcomes in ANP patients with POF. Clinical relevance Our prediction models can identify patients who may benefit from early invasive intervention and assess in-hospital mortality risk for the entire cohort, providing a practical tool to guide clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11766-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop contrast-enhanced CT-based nomograms for predicting early intervention efficacy and in-hospital mortality in acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) with persistent organ failure (POF).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 164 ANP patients with POF (110 in the training cohort, 54 in the validation cohort). The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was used to evaluate organ dysfunction severity. Contrast-enhanced CT parameters included mean and range CT numbers (HU) of acute necrotic collections (ANC) across anatomical regions, as well as pancreatic necrosis volume (PNV). LASSO regression identified predictors for early intervention efficacy and mortality. Nomograms were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

Results: Early intervention efficacy predictors included intra-abdominal pressure, cardiovascular hemodynamic changes, and PNV increase. The model demonstrated good predictive performance, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.769-0.927) in the training cohort and 0.796 (95% CI: 0.644-0.947) in the validation cohort. In-hospital mortality predictors were SOFA score, cardiovascular hemodynamic changes, mean CT number of ANC at the right anterior pararenal space, and CT number range at the left paracolic gutter. The model showed AUCs of 0.918 (training cohort, 95% CI: 0.864-0.971) and 0.860 (validation cohort, 95% CI: 0.801-0.919).

Conclusion: ANP patients with intra-abdominal hypertension or significant PNV increase who maintain cardiovascular hemodynamic stability are more likely to benefit from early intervention. An elevated SOFA score, persistent cardiovascular failure, and ANC with poor homogeneity or drainage difficulty are risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Key points: Question The optimal timing for early invasive intervention remains controversial in ANP with POF. Findings Nomogram models integrating organ dysfunction severity and contrast-enhanced CT imaging features can predict treatment response and clinical outcomes in ANP patients with POF. Clinical relevance Our prediction models can identify patients who may benefit from early invasive intervention and assess in-hospital mortality risk for the entire cohort, providing a practical tool to guide clinical decision-making.

基于对比增强ct的急性坏死性胰腺炎伴持续性器官衰竭早期干预疗效和院内死亡风险预测模型
目的:建立基于ct增强成像的急性坏死性胰腺炎(ANP)合并持续性器官衰竭(POF)的早期干预效果和住院死亡率预测。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了164例ANP合并POF患者(110例为训练组,54例为验证组)。顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分用于评估器官功能障碍的严重程度。对比增强CT参数包括各解剖区域急性坏死集合(ANC)的平均和范围CT数(HU)以及胰腺坏死体积(PNV)。LASSO回归确定了早期干预疗效和死亡率的预测因子。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析对nomogram进行评估。结果:早期干预效果预测指标包括腹内压、心血管血流动力学改变和PNV升高。该模型具有良好的预测性能,训练组ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.848 (95% CI: 0.769-0.927),验证组为0.796 (95% CI: 0.644-0.947)。院内死亡预测因子为SOFA评分、心血管血流动力学改变、右侧肾旁间隙ANC平均CT数、左侧结肠旁沟CT数范围。模型的auc分别为0.918(训练组,95% CI: 0.864-0.971)和0.860(验证组,95% CI: 0.801-0.919)。结论:ANP合并腹内高压或PNV显著升高,维持心血管血流动力学稳定的患者更有可能从早期干预中获益。SOFA评分升高、持续性心血管衰竭、ANC同质性差或引流困难是院内死亡的危险因素。ANP合并POF的早期有创干预的最佳时机仍然存在争议。结果结合器官功能障碍严重程度和增强CT影像特征的Nomogram模型可以预测ANP合并POF患者的治疗效果和临床结果。我们的预测模型可以识别可能受益于早期侵入性干预的患者,并评估整个队列的院内死亡风险,为指导临床决策提供实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信