Exploring the therapeutic potential of transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic low back pain: a scoping review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Aminu A Ibrahim, Katayan Klahan, Kanphajee Sornkaew, Jarugool Tretriluxana, Sheri P Silfies, Peemongkon Wattananon
{"title":"Exploring the therapeutic potential of transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic low back pain: a scoping review.","authors":"Aminu A Ibrahim, Katayan Klahan, Kanphajee Sornkaew, Jarugool Tretriluxana, Sheri P Silfies, Peemongkon Wattananon","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08870-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common disabling condition, inflicting a substantial socioeconomic burden. Given its association with neuroplastic changes, as evidenced by central and peripheral sensitization, neuromodulatory techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have emerged as potential treatments. This scoping review aimed to identify and map the existing literature on tDCS studies for CLBP to provide insight into how these studies are conducted, and to address their potential gaps in knowledge.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies from inception to 23 March 2025. Eligible studies included were those examining tDCS alone or with other interventions in adults with CLBP, regardless of the outcome evaluated and included adults with CLBP. The review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage framework and was guided by the PRISMA for scoping review framework.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Of 134 screened records, 26 studies were included: 23 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasi-experimental studies. Half of the studies (50%) had a low risk of bias while one-third (34.6%) showed a high or serious risk of bias. Outcomes evaluated varied and included clinical, biophysical, biomechanical, and psychosocial measures. There was considerable variability in tDCS treatment protocols across studies. The effectiveness of tDCS was inconsistent, particularly for clinical outcomes, with some studies indicating positive effects while others reported no significant effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this review reveals inconsistent results for tDCS effectiveness in CLBP, likely due to variability in study designs, sample characteristics, treatment protocols, and outcome measures. Future well-designed trials are needed to clarify the therapeutic potential of tDCS for CLBP, particularly in combination with other interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.25.08870-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common disabling condition, inflicting a substantial socioeconomic burden. Given its association with neuroplastic changes, as evidenced by central and peripheral sensitization, neuromodulatory techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have emerged as potential treatments. This scoping review aimed to identify and map the existing literature on tDCS studies for CLBP to provide insight into how these studies are conducted, and to address their potential gaps in knowledge.

Evidence acquisition: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies from inception to 23 March 2025. Eligible studies included were those examining tDCS alone or with other interventions in adults with CLBP, regardless of the outcome evaluated and included adults with CLBP. The review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage framework and was guided by the PRISMA for scoping review framework.

Evidence synthesis: Of 134 screened records, 26 studies were included: 23 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasi-experimental studies. Half of the studies (50%) had a low risk of bias while one-third (34.6%) showed a high or serious risk of bias. Outcomes evaluated varied and included clinical, biophysical, biomechanical, and psychosocial measures. There was considerable variability in tDCS treatment protocols across studies. The effectiveness of tDCS was inconsistent, particularly for clinical outcomes, with some studies indicating positive effects while others reported no significant effects.

Conclusions: Overall, this review reveals inconsistent results for tDCS effectiveness in CLBP, likely due to variability in study designs, sample characteristics, treatment protocols, and outcome measures. Future well-designed trials are needed to clarify the therapeutic potential of tDCS for CLBP, particularly in combination with other interventions.

探索经颅直流电刺激治疗慢性腰痛的潜力:范围综述。
慢性腰痛(CLBP)是一种常见的致残疾病,造成了巨大的社会经济负担。鉴于其与神经可塑性改变的关联,如中枢和外周致敏,神经调节技术如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已成为潜在的治疗方法。本综述旨在识别和绘制关于CLBP tDCS研究的现有文献,以深入了解这些研究是如何进行的,并解决其潜在的知识空白。证据获取:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library从成立到2025年3月23日的相关研究。纳入的合格研究包括单独或联合其他干预措施对CLBP成人患者进行tDCS治疗的研究,无论评估结果如何,纳入的研究包括CLBP成人患者。审查采用了Arksey和O'Malley的六阶段框架,并以PRISMA的范围审查框架为指导。证据综合:在134份筛选记录中,纳入26项研究:23项随机对照试验和3项准实验研究。一半的研究(50%)具有低偏倚风险,三分之一(34.6%)显示高或严重的偏倚风险。评估的结果多种多样,包括临床、生物物理、生物力学和社会心理测量。不同研究的tDCS治疗方案存在相当大的差异。tDCS的有效性是不一致的,特别是在临床结果方面,一些研究表明有积极的效果,而另一些研究报告没有显著的效果。结论:总的来说,本综述揭示了tDCS治疗CLBP有效性的不一致结果,可能是由于研究设计、样本特征、治疗方案和结果测量的差异。未来需要精心设计的试验来阐明tDCS对CLBP的治疗潜力,特别是与其他干预措施相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信