Anticoagulate the Circuit, Not the Patient: Nitric Oxide Reduces Thrombus Formation During Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Teryn R Roberts, Yanyi Zang, George T Harea, Daniel S Wendorff, Brendan M Beely, Leopoldo C Cancio, Andrea Selkow Wallish, Tracey V Wick, Melissa M Reynolds, Andriy I Batchinsky
{"title":"Anticoagulate the Circuit, Not the Patient: Nitric Oxide Reduces Thrombus Formation During Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal.","authors":"Teryn R Roberts, Yanyi Zang, George T Harea, Daniel S Wendorff, Brendan M Beely, Leopoldo C Cancio, Andrea Selkow Wallish, Tracey V Wick, Melissa M Reynolds, Andriy I Batchinsky","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solutions to reduce the need for systemic anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support would improve safety and utility. The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a nitric oxide-generating extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) system without systemic anticoagulation in a translational swine model. We hypothesized that nitric oxide reduces circuit thrombosis, without untoward systemic effects. Anesthetized, mechanically ventilated swine (50-60 kg) received bicaval jugular cannulation for 72 hour venovenous ECCO2R. Control (n = 6) received a standard ECCO2R device with systemic heparinization. Treatment (n = 6) received the same device, but with nitric oxide-generating circuitry and 80 ppm nitric oxide added to sweep gas, without systemic heparinization. No between-group differences in vitals, ventilator settings, blood gases, extracorporeal gas exchange, or fluid balance occurred. In both groups, ECCO2R enabled reduction in tidal volume. Oxygenator thrombus area, quantified following dissection and imaging, was reduced in treatment (10.2 ± 1.2%) versus control (15.2 ± 1.6%) (p = 0.03). One control oxygenator occluded. No nitric oxide-related adverse effects were observed, including methemoglobinemia. Nitric oxide-enhanced ECCO2R enabled 72 hours of support without systemic anticoagulation, and without altering oxygenator performance or causing untoward systemic effects. Future studies are needed to investigate efficacy in subjects with underlying coagulopathy and/or contraindications for systemic anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solutions to reduce the need for systemic anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support would improve safety and utility. The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a nitric oxide-generating extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) system without systemic anticoagulation in a translational swine model. We hypothesized that nitric oxide reduces circuit thrombosis, without untoward systemic effects. Anesthetized, mechanically ventilated swine (50-60 kg) received bicaval jugular cannulation for 72 hour venovenous ECCO2R. Control (n = 6) received a standard ECCO2R device with systemic heparinization. Treatment (n = 6) received the same device, but with nitric oxide-generating circuitry and 80 ppm nitric oxide added to sweep gas, without systemic heparinization. No between-group differences in vitals, ventilator settings, blood gases, extracorporeal gas exchange, or fluid balance occurred. In both groups, ECCO2R enabled reduction in tidal volume. Oxygenator thrombus area, quantified following dissection and imaging, was reduced in treatment (10.2 ± 1.2%) versus control (15.2 ± 1.6%) (p = 0.03). One control oxygenator occluded. No nitric oxide-related adverse effects were observed, including methemoglobinemia. Nitric oxide-enhanced ECCO2R enabled 72 hours of support without systemic anticoagulation, and without altering oxygenator performance or causing untoward systemic effects. Future studies are needed to investigate efficacy in subjects with underlying coagulopathy and/or contraindications for systemic anticoagulation.

抗凝电路,而不是病人:一氧化氮减少体外二氧化碳去除过程中的血栓形成。
减少体外生命支持期间系统抗凝需求的解决方案将提高安全性和实用性。研究目的是在转译猪模型中评估无系统抗凝的一氧化氮生成体外二氧化碳去除(ECCO2R)系统的安全性和有效性。我们假设一氧化氮可以减少回路血栓形成,而不会对全身产生不良影响。麻醉,机械通气猪(50-60 kg)接受双颈静脉插管72小时静脉ECCO2R。对照组(n = 6)接受标准ECCO2R装置和全身肝素化治疗。治疗组(n = 6)使用相同的装置,但添加了一氧化氮生成电路,并在扫气中添加了80 ppm的一氧化氮,不进行全身肝素化。两组之间在生命体征、呼吸机设置、血气、体外气体交换或液体平衡方面没有差异。在两组中,ECCO2R都能减少潮汐量。氧合器血栓面积,在分离和成像后量化,治疗组(10.2±1.2%)比对照组(15.2±1.6%)减少(p = 0.03)。一个控制氧合器堵塞。没有观察到一氧化氮相关的不良反应,包括高铁血红蛋白血症。一氧化氮增强的ECCO2R能够在没有全身抗凝的情况下支持72小时,并且不会改变氧合器的性能或引起不良的全身影响。对于有潜在凝血功能障碍和/或全身抗凝禁忌症的受试者,需要进一步的研究来调查其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信