Optimal timing of chest radiograph following chest tube removal in detecting recurrent pneumothorax: analysis of 163 patients with thoracic stab wounds at a major trauma centre in South Africa.
V Kong, J Ko, C Cheung, H Lee, R He, J Wang, D Clarke
{"title":"Optimal timing of chest radiograph following chest tube removal in detecting recurrent pneumothorax: analysis of 163 patients with thoracic stab wounds at a major trauma centre in South Africa.","authors":"V Kong, J Ko, C Cheung, H Lee, R He, J Wang, D Clarke","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2025.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Routine chest radiograph (CXR) following chest tube removal is a common practice, yet the optimal timing of CXR in detecting recurrent pneumothorax (RPTX) remains unknown. This study reviewed the incidence of RPTX and its relationship to the timing of the detection of CXR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was conducted over a 24-month period on patients with thoracic stab wounds who underwent CXR following chest tube removal at a major trauma centre in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-three patients were included (91% male, mean age: 25 years). Eleven patients (7%) had RPTX, one (9%) of whom required reinsertion of a chest tube. No patients were readmitted following discharge. The timing of the CXR was: <2h (11%), 2-4h (21%), 4-6h (28%), 6-8h (31%) and >8h (9%). Of the 11 RPTX, 55% were detected on CXR at <2h, 36% at 2-4h, 9% at 4-6h, 0% at 6-8h (0%) and 0% at >8h. All RPTX were detected within <6h of chest tube removal. There was no re-presentation of any patients following discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RPTX following chest tube removal is uncommon, and the need for reintervention is low. All patients with RPTX were detected on CXR obtained within 6h of removal. It would appear that routinely delaying CXR anytime beyond 6 hours is unnecessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Routine chest radiograph (CXR) following chest tube removal is a common practice, yet the optimal timing of CXR in detecting recurrent pneumothorax (RPTX) remains unknown. This study reviewed the incidence of RPTX and its relationship to the timing of the detection of CXR.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted over a 24-month period on patients with thoracic stab wounds who underwent CXR following chest tube removal at a major trauma centre in South Africa.
Results: One hundred and sixty-three patients were included (91% male, mean age: 25 years). Eleven patients (7%) had RPTX, one (9%) of whom required reinsertion of a chest tube. No patients were readmitted following discharge. The timing of the CXR was: <2h (11%), 2-4h (21%), 4-6h (28%), 6-8h (31%) and >8h (9%). Of the 11 RPTX, 55% were detected on CXR at <2h, 36% at 2-4h, 9% at 4-6h, 0% at 6-8h (0%) and 0% at >8h. All RPTX were detected within <6h of chest tube removal. There was no re-presentation of any patients following discharge.
Conclusion: RPTX following chest tube removal is uncommon, and the need for reintervention is low. All patients with RPTX were detected on CXR obtained within 6h of removal. It would appear that routinely delaying CXR anytime beyond 6 hours is unnecessary.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November.
The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.