COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake Among California Workers in 2020–2022

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kathleen Garvey, Ximena Vergara
{"title":"COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake Among California Workers in 2020–2022","authors":"Kathleen Garvey,&nbsp;Ximena Vergara","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Workplace interactions provide an opportunity for COVID-19 transmission, contributing to severe morbidity and mortality. While vaccines offer a key mitigation measure, hesitancy among certain populations may reduce the achievement of widespread immunity. This analysis characterizes COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among California workers to inform interventions aimed at increasing vaccine confidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed data from the 2020–2022 adult California Health Interview Surveys (CHIS). We estimated survey-weighted COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (2020) and unvaccinated frequencies (2021, 2022) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) among employed Californians by demographics and major occupational group. Multivariable logistic regression models examined vaccine intention and uptake by occupation, controlling for potential confounders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In 2020, 24.1% (CI: 23.1%–25.1%) of California workers were considered “vaccine hesitant,” and in 2021 and 2022, 43.1% (CI: 42.2%–44.1%) and 9.3% (CI: 8.5%–10.2%) of California workers were unvaccinated, respectively. Hesitancy was highest among Black and Hispanic workers, and vaccine uptake was lowest among these groups in both years. Workers in the Installation, Maintenance, and Repair and the Construction and Extraction occupations had the lowest odds of vaccine intention and uptake each year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The aforementioned workers faced the highest burden of COVID-19 fatalities in 2020 and may be at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, COVID-19 infection, and subsequent long-term health consequences. These trends should be considered when planning intervention programs to increase worker vaccine confidence and uptake. Further exploration of the reasons for low vaccine uptake and ways to minimize these gaps is paramount for both COVID-19 and impending pandemic threats.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 9","pages":"740-760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Workplace interactions provide an opportunity for COVID-19 transmission, contributing to severe morbidity and mortality. While vaccines offer a key mitigation measure, hesitancy among certain populations may reduce the achievement of widespread immunity. This analysis characterizes COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and uptake among California workers to inform interventions aimed at increasing vaccine confidence.

Methods

We analyzed data from the 2020–2022 adult California Health Interview Surveys (CHIS). We estimated survey-weighted COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (2020) and unvaccinated frequencies (2021, 2022) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) among employed Californians by demographics and major occupational group. Multivariable logistic regression models examined vaccine intention and uptake by occupation, controlling for potential confounders.

Results

In 2020, 24.1% (CI: 23.1%–25.1%) of California workers were considered “vaccine hesitant,” and in 2021 and 2022, 43.1% (CI: 42.2%–44.1%) and 9.3% (CI: 8.5%–10.2%) of California workers were unvaccinated, respectively. Hesitancy was highest among Black and Hispanic workers, and vaccine uptake was lowest among these groups in both years. Workers in the Installation, Maintenance, and Repair and the Construction and Extraction occupations had the lowest odds of vaccine intention and uptake each year.

Conclusion

The aforementioned workers faced the highest burden of COVID-19 fatalities in 2020 and may be at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, COVID-19 infection, and subsequent long-term health consequences. These trends should be considered when planning intervention programs to increase worker vaccine confidence and uptake. Further exploration of the reasons for low vaccine uptake and ways to minimize these gaps is paramount for both COVID-19 and impending pandemic threats.

2020-2022年加州工人对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫和吸收
背景:工作场所的互动为COVID-19的传播提供了机会,导致严重的发病率和死亡率。虽然疫苗是一项关键的缓解措施,但某些人群的犹豫不决可能会降低实现广泛免疫的难度。该分析描述了加州工人对COVID-19疫苗的犹豫和接受情况,为旨在提高疫苗信心的干预措施提供信息。方法:我们分析了2020-2022年加州成人健康访谈调查(CHIS)的数据。我们按人口统计学和主要职业群体估计了加州就业人口中调查加权的COVID-19疫苗犹豫(2020年)和未接种疫苗频率(2021年、2022年),置信区间(CI)为95%。多变量逻辑回归模型检查了疫苗意向和职业摄取情况,控制了潜在的混杂因素。结果:2020年,24.1% (CI: 23.1%-25.1%)的加州工人被认为是“疫苗犹豫”,2021年和2022年,分别有43.1% (CI: 42.2%-44.1%)和9.3% (CI: 8.5%-10.2%)的加州工人未接种疫苗。在这两年中,黑人和西班牙裔工人的犹豫率最高,而这些群体的疫苗接种率最低。安装、维护和维修以及建筑和提取职业的工人每年接种疫苗的意愿和接种几率最低。结论:上述工人在2020年面临着最高的COVID-19死亡负担,并且可能面临更高的SARS-CoV-2暴露、COVID-19感染以及随后的长期健康后果的风险。在规划干预方案以提高工人对疫苗的信心和接受度时,应考虑到这些趋势。对于COVID-19和即将到来的大流行威胁而言,进一步探索疫苗接种率低的原因和最小化这些差距的方法至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信