Comparative evaluation of PECS II versus RISS block for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2025-05-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/CEED1530
Xiaoyu Zhang, Yulong Jia, Chenxu Chou, Xiaguang Duan
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of PECS II versus RISS block for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Xiaoyu Zhang, Yulong Jia, Chenxu Chou, Xiaguang Duan","doi":"10.62347/CEED1530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of Pectoral Nerve Block Type II (PECS II) versus Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block (RISS) after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial recruited 67 female patients undergoing unilateral MRM from December 1, 2023, to December 1, 2024 at Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the PECS II group (n=30) or the RISS group (n=30). Primary outcomes included Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scores at 6 and 24 hours and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores in the PACU and at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included sufentanil consumption via PCIA, the number of effective compressions, remifentanil use during surgery, additional analgesic administrations, sleep quality, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PECS II group demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores than the RISS group at rest and during movement in the PACU and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours (P<0.05). The QoR-40 score at 6 hours was significantly higher in the PECS II group (P<0.0001). The remifentanil consumption, sufentanil dosage and effective compressions via PCIA during surgery were also significantly lower in the PECS II group, compared to the RISS group (P<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PECS II block appears to be a more effective analgesic technique than RISS block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, providing better pain control, reducing opioid consumption, and potentially facilitating faster recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 5","pages":"3971-3981"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/CEED1530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of Pectoral Nerve Block Type II (PECS II) versus Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block (RISS) after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer.

Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial recruited 67 female patients undergoing unilateral MRM from December 1, 2023, to December 1, 2024 at Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the PECS II group (n=30) or the RISS group (n=30). Primary outcomes included Quality of Recovery (QoR-40) scores at 6 and 24 hours and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores in the PACU and at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included sufentanil consumption via PCIA, the number of effective compressions, remifentanil use during surgery, additional analgesic administrations, sleep quality, and adverse events.

Results: The PECS II group demonstrated significantly lower VAS scores than the RISS group at rest and during movement in the PACU and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours (P<0.05). The QoR-40 score at 6 hours was significantly higher in the PECS II group (P<0.0001). The remifentanil consumption, sufentanil dosage and effective compressions via PCIA during surgery were also significantly lower in the PECS II group, compared to the RISS group (P<0.0001).

Conclusion: PECS II block appears to be a more effective analgesic technique than RISS block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, providing better pain control, reducing opioid consumption, and potentially facilitating faster recovery.

PECS II与RISS阻滞用于乳腺癌手术术后镇痛的比较评价:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在探讨改良乳房根治术(MRM)后胸神经阻滞ⅱ型(PECSⅱ)与Rhomboid肋间及锯下肌平面阻滞(RISS)的镇痛效果。方法:本前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验招募了2023年12月1日至2024年12月1日在内蒙古宝钢医院行单侧磁共振成像的女性患者67例。患者按1:1比例随机分配到PECS II组(n=30)或RISS组(n=30)。主要结果包括6小时和24小时的恢复质量(QoR-40)评分和PACU以及术后2、6、12、24和48小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结局包括经PCIA的舒芬太尼用量、有效按压次数、手术中瑞芬太尼的使用、额外的镇痛药、睡眠质量和不良事件。结果:PECS II组在PACU内休息和运动时以及2、6、12和24小时的VAS评分明显低于RISS组(pp结论:PECS II阻滞似乎是一种比RISS阻滞更有效的乳腺癌手术患者镇痛技术,提供更好的疼痛控制,减少阿片类药物的消耗,并可能促进更快的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信