{"title":"Clinical study on ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Rongrong Li, Yang Yu","doi":"10.62347/ESHV1093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefits of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) compared to surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 100 patients with HCC who underwent either ultrasound-guided MWA (n = 58) or SR (n = 42). Baseline characteristics, liver function tests, tumor markers, complications, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with follow-up evaluations at 12, 24, and 36 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MWA demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to SR (P < 0.001). Post-treatment levels of liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) and total bilirubin. Both groups showed significant reductions in alpha-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, with no significant difference between them (both P < 0.001). The complication rate was significantly lower in the MWA group (P < 0.001). Tumor response, including complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR), was higher in the MWA group (CR: 40 vs. 20; ORR: 86.2% vs. 65.6%). Additionally, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 12, 24, and 36 months were significantly better in the MWA group (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided MWA provides notable advantages over SR in the treatment of HCC, including less hepatic injury, fewer complications, and improved PFS and OS. These findings support MWA as a safe, minimally invasive, and effective alternative for HCC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":"17 5","pages":"3640-3648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12170378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/ESHV1093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefits of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) compared to surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods: This retrospective study included 100 patients with HCC who underwent either ultrasound-guided MWA (n = 58) or SR (n = 42). Baseline characteristics, liver function tests, tumor markers, complications, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with follow-up evaluations at 12, 24, and 36 months.
Results: MWA demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to SR (P < 0.001). Post-treatment levels of liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) and total bilirubin. Both groups showed significant reductions in alpha-fetoprotein and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, with no significant difference between them (both P < 0.001). The complication rate was significantly lower in the MWA group (P < 0.001). Tumor response, including complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR), was higher in the MWA group (CR: 40 vs. 20; ORR: 86.2% vs. 65.6%). Additionally, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 12, 24, and 36 months were significantly better in the MWA group (all P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided MWA provides notable advantages over SR in the treatment of HCC, including less hepatic injury, fewer complications, and improved PFS and OS. These findings support MWA as a safe, minimally invasive, and effective alternative for HCC management.