Rare species do not disproportionately contribute to phylogenetic diversity in a subalpine plant community

IF 2.7 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Leah N. Veldhuisen, Verónica Zepeda, Brian J. Enquist, Katrina M. Dlugosch
{"title":"Rare species do not disproportionately contribute to phylogenetic diversity in a subalpine plant community","authors":"Leah N. Veldhuisen,&nbsp;Verónica Zepeda,&nbsp;Brian J. Enquist,&nbsp;Katrina M. Dlugosch","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Within plant communities, few species are abundant, and most are locally rare. Worldwide, 36% of plant species are exceedingly rare and often face high extinction risk. However, the community phylogenetic impact of the loss of rare plants is largely unknown in many systems. We address this gap by investigating how rare species contribute to phylogenetic diversity, considering multiple metrics of rarity and multiple elevations in a subalpine plant community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We collected abundance data at three sites near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (Colorado, USA). We calculated each species' range size from public occurrence data. We calculated phylogenetic signal for abundance and range size, compared community phylogenetic metrics weighted by range size and abundance to unweighted metrics, and quantified the change in phylogenetic diversity when removing single species and groups of species ranked by rarity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found phylogenetic signal for abundance, but not range size. There was no difference between rarity-weighted and -unweighted phylogenetic diversity metrics. Finally, phylogenetic diversity did not decline more when we removed single rare species or groups of rare species than when we removed single common species and groups of common species.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found that rare species, whether at low abundance or with a small range, do not disproportionately contribute to phylogenetic diversity in our subalpine plant community. These results were consistent across elevations. Instead, rare species might provide phylogenetic redundancy with common species. Deeper understanding of functional differentiation is needed to understand contributions of rare species to this system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"112 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Within plant communities, few species are abundant, and most are locally rare. Worldwide, 36% of plant species are exceedingly rare and often face high extinction risk. However, the community phylogenetic impact of the loss of rare plants is largely unknown in many systems. We address this gap by investigating how rare species contribute to phylogenetic diversity, considering multiple metrics of rarity and multiple elevations in a subalpine plant community.

Methods

We collected abundance data at three sites near the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (Colorado, USA). We calculated each species' range size from public occurrence data. We calculated phylogenetic signal for abundance and range size, compared community phylogenetic metrics weighted by range size and abundance to unweighted metrics, and quantified the change in phylogenetic diversity when removing single species and groups of species ranked by rarity.

Results

We found phylogenetic signal for abundance, but not range size. There was no difference between rarity-weighted and -unweighted phylogenetic diversity metrics. Finally, phylogenetic diversity did not decline more when we removed single rare species or groups of rare species than when we removed single common species and groups of common species.

Conclusions

We found that rare species, whether at low abundance or with a small range, do not disproportionately contribute to phylogenetic diversity in our subalpine plant community. These results were consistent across elevations. Instead, rare species might provide phylogenetic redundancy with common species. Deeper understanding of functional differentiation is needed to understand contributions of rare species to this system.

Abstract Image

稀有物种对亚高山植物群落系统发育多样性的贡献不大。
前提:在植物群落中,很少有物种是丰富的,大多数是当地罕见的。在世界范围内,36%的植物物种非常罕见,往往面临着高度灭绝的风险。然而,在许多系统中,珍稀植物丧失对群落系统发育的影响在很大程度上是未知的。我们通过研究稀有物种如何促进系统发育多样性来解决这一差距,考虑到亚高山植物群落的稀有度和多海拔的多种指标。方法:我们在美国科罗拉多州落基山生物实验室附近的三个地点收集丰度数据。我们从公开发生的数据中计算出每个物种的范围大小。我们计算了丰度和范围大小的系统发育信号,比较了范围大小和丰度加权的群落系统发育指标与未加权的群落系统发育指标,并量化了去除单个物种和稀有度排序的物种群时系统发育多样性的变化。结果:我们发现了丰度的系统发育信号,但没有范围大小的系统发育信号。稀有性加权和未加权的系统发育多样性指标之间没有差异。最后,系统发育多样性在移除单个稀有物种或稀有物种群时的下降幅度并不大于移除单个常见物种和常见物种群时的下降幅度。结论:我们发现,无论是低丰度还是小范围的稀有物种,对亚高山植物群落的系统发育多样性都没有不成比例的贡献。这些结果在不同海拔高度是一致的。相反,稀有物种可能与常见物种提供系统发育冗余。要了解稀有物种对这一系统的贡献,需要对功能分化有更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信