Bipolar Early Intervention Using New Digital Technologies (BLEND): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Novel Blended-Digital Early Intervention Model of Care for Youth With Bipolar Disorder I or II

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Aswin Ratheesh, Jesse Gates, Dylan Hammond, Clare Shelton, Craig Macneil, Melissa Hasty M, Arup Dhar, Simon D'Alfonso, Lianne Schmaal, Lars V. Kessing, John F. Gleeson, Chris Davey, Andrew Chanen, Greg Murray, Sue M. Cotton, Patrick D. McGorry, Michael Berk, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
{"title":"Bipolar Early Intervention Using New Digital Technologies (BLEND): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Novel Blended-Digital Early Intervention Model of Care for Youth With Bipolar Disorder I or II","authors":"Aswin Ratheesh,&nbsp;Jesse Gates,&nbsp;Dylan Hammond,&nbsp;Clare Shelton,&nbsp;Craig Macneil,&nbsp;Melissa Hasty M,&nbsp;Arup Dhar,&nbsp;Simon D'Alfonso,&nbsp;Lianne Schmaal,&nbsp;Lars V. Kessing,&nbsp;John F. Gleeson,&nbsp;Chris Davey,&nbsp;Andrew Chanen,&nbsp;Greg Murray,&nbsp;Sue M. Cotton,&nbsp;Patrick D. McGorry,&nbsp;Michael Berk,&nbsp;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez","doi":"10.1111/eip.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite evidence for early interventions for bipolar disorder (BD), there are relatively few accessible treatment models. We developed a digitally augmented model of care termed BLEND (BipoLar early interventions using New Digital technologies) which aims to improve mood symptoms in BD. BLEND includes: (a) guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy; (b) in-person psychological therapies blended with digital therapeutic content and (c) digital relapse monitoring. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) describe the acceptability, safety and feasibility of delivering BLEND and (ii) examine the feasibility of an efficacy trial of BLEND compared with enhanced standard care (ESC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a parallel-group, open-label, 2:1 randomised pilot trial within a youth mental-health outpatient service in Melbourne, Australia. We included youth aged 15–25 years with BD I or II, who had not previously accessed multidisciplinary care. All participants received similar background care. BLEND differed from ESC in having manualised blended digital and in-person psychological therapies and digital relapse monitoring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We randomised 21 young people over a 12-month recruitment period, predominantly female participants (71.4%) with BD Type II (85.7%). Both treatment models were acceptable and safe, but the BLEND group had greater reductions in suicidal ideation. Among components of BLEND, in-person psychological therapy and psychopharmacological interventions could be delivered with fidelity. Digital therapy engagement was high, but participants used digital relapse monitoring variably.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The BLEND model was safe and acceptable and may lead to improvements in suicidality compared with ESC. Concordant with the aims of a pilot study, there is scope for the content to be rationalised based on feedback to improve feasibility of the digital therapy. Relapse monitoring may usefully be extended to depressive symptoms. The next step is to confirm the efficacy of BLEND compared with standard care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eip.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite evidence for early interventions for bipolar disorder (BD), there are relatively few accessible treatment models. We developed a digitally augmented model of care termed BLEND (BipoLar early interventions using New Digital technologies) which aims to improve mood symptoms in BD. BLEND includes: (a) guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy; (b) in-person psychological therapies blended with digital therapeutic content and (c) digital relapse monitoring. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) describe the acceptability, safety and feasibility of delivering BLEND and (ii) examine the feasibility of an efficacy trial of BLEND compared with enhanced standard care (ESC).

Method

We conducted a parallel-group, open-label, 2:1 randomised pilot trial within a youth mental-health outpatient service in Melbourne, Australia. We included youth aged 15–25 years with BD I or II, who had not previously accessed multidisciplinary care. All participants received similar background care. BLEND differed from ESC in having manualised blended digital and in-person psychological therapies and digital relapse monitoring.

Results

We randomised 21 young people over a 12-month recruitment period, predominantly female participants (71.4%) with BD Type II (85.7%). Both treatment models were acceptable and safe, but the BLEND group had greater reductions in suicidal ideation. Among components of BLEND, in-person psychological therapy and psychopharmacological interventions could be delivered with fidelity. Digital therapy engagement was high, but participants used digital relapse monitoring variably.

Conclusions

The BLEND model was safe and acceptable and may lead to improvements in suicidality compared with ESC. Concordant with the aims of a pilot study, there is scope for the content to be rationalised based on feedback to improve feasibility of the digital therapy. Relapse monitoring may usefully be extended to depressive symptoms. The next step is to confirm the efficacy of BLEND compared with standard care.

使用新数字技术(BLEND)的双相情感障碍早期干预:一项新的混合-数字早期干预模式护理青少年双相情感障碍I或II的试点随机对照试验
背景:尽管有证据表明双相情感障碍(BD)的早期干预,但相对而言,很少有可行的治疗模式。我们开发了一种名为BLEND(使用新数字技术的双相情感障碍早期干预)的数字增强护理模型,旨在改善双相情感障碍的情绪症状。BLEND包括:(a)符合指南的药物治疗;(b)与数字治疗内容相结合的面对面心理治疗和(c)数字复发监测。本研究的目的是双重的:(i)描述提供BLEND的可接受性、安全性和可行性;(ii)检查将BLEND与强化标准治疗(ESC)进行疗效试验的可行性。方法:我们在澳大利亚墨尔本的一家青少年心理健康门诊进行了一项平行组、开放标签、2:1随机试验。我们纳入了15-25岁的BD I或II患者,他们之前没有接受过多学科治疗。所有参与者都接受了类似的背景护理。BLEND与ESC的不同之处在于,它采用了手动混合的数字和面对面的心理治疗以及数字复发监测。我们在12个月的招募期内随机抽取了21名年轻人,主要是女性参与者(71.4%),患有BD II型(85.7%)。两种治疗模式都是可接受且安全的,但混合治疗组的自杀意念减少幅度更大。在BLEND的组成部分中,面对面的心理治疗和精神药物干预可以忠实地提供。数字治疗的参与度很高,但参与者使用数字复发监测的方式各不相同。结论BLEND模型是安全、可接受的,与ESC相比,可能会改善自杀率。与试点研究的目标一致,根据反馈对内容进行合理化,以提高数字治疗的可行性。复发监测可以有效地扩展到抑郁症状。下一步是确认BLEND与标准治疗的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信