Transforming Health Insurance in Bangladesh: A Future-Ready Approach

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
MD. Faisal Ahmed
{"title":"Transforming Health Insurance in Bangladesh: A Future-Ready Approach","authors":"MD. Faisal Ahmed","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I am writing in response to <i>“The Urgent Need for Developing a Common Health Insurance Policy in Bangladesh: A Perspective”</i> [<span>1</span>]. The article effectively highlights the pressing need for a universal health insurance system in Bangladesh. However, it largely advocates for conventional solutions that have faced challenges in implementation across low- and middle-income countries. A paradigm shift is necessary—one that moves beyond traditional state-led models to explore decentralized, technology-driven, and behaviorally informed strategies tailored to Bangladesh's economic and social realities.</p><p>Habib and Molla reports that out-of-pocket healthcare spending amounts to 68.5% of total healthcare costs in Bangladesh which causes financial difficulties for numerous citizens [<span>2</span>]. They suggest raising government funding while improving coverage through existing health programs. Using only state-funded initiatives fails to address the constraints that stem from both fiscal capacity and administrative efficiency issues. A better solution combines mandatory insurance with voluntary options through digital financial access while employing behavioral economics to boost participation rates.</p><p>The scarcity of health insurance payments stems from people's distrust of financial institutions and their inability to see immediate advantages from coverage. Behavioral economics provides solutions through default enrollment models which require people to actively decline insurance coverage. Mobile banking platforms bKash and Nagad should integrate health insurance services through automatic micro-premium withdrawals which maintain user involvement while avoiding yearly payment requirements. Insurance communication becomes more effective through behavioral alignment when risk protection messages replace long-term health investment messaging.</p><p>A new approach would be the implementation of health insurance models supported by diaspora communities. The annual remittance amount of over $22 billion in Bangladesh lacks an organized system to direct this money toward healthcare funding. Insurance plans that allow expatriates to pay insurance premiums for family members and support community-based risk funds would enhance healthcare coverage among vulnerable populations. The Philippines and Mexico together with other countries have established successful diaspora-backed healthcare insurance systems which reduced healthcare expenses paid directly by patients to millions of people [<span>3, 4</span>].</p><p>Technological integration is also crucial. The article correctly identifies healthcare financing problems yet fails to investigate blockchain-based claims automation and AI-based adaptive pricing solutions. Blockchain technology brings transparency to operations while reducing fraud and streamlines claim settlements through automation to establish system-wide trust [<span>5</span>]. AI-driven underwriting systems allow for risk-based premium adjustments which enables insurance affordability for different income groups according to Rix [<span>6</span>]. Proof-of-concept deployments in Rwanda and Kenya show that these innovations can scale up for emerging markets [<span>7, 8</span>].</p><p>Bangladesh needs to prevent implementing models from high-income countries because their economic and institutional structures differ too much from its own. The country needs to prioritize a combined method that includes public-private collaborations with technological enhancements and behavioral economic practices. The implementation of mobile-based microinsurance and remittance-backed financing and blockchain claims processing requires initial testing through pilot programs for framework scalability purposes. The absence of forward-thinking strategies makes universal health coverage efforts stay theoretical instead of becoming practical initiatives.</p><p><b>MD. Faisal Ahmed:</b> writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, resources, data curation.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70945","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I am writing in response to “The Urgent Need for Developing a Common Health Insurance Policy in Bangladesh: A Perspective” [1]. The article effectively highlights the pressing need for a universal health insurance system in Bangladesh. However, it largely advocates for conventional solutions that have faced challenges in implementation across low- and middle-income countries. A paradigm shift is necessary—one that moves beyond traditional state-led models to explore decentralized, technology-driven, and behaviorally informed strategies tailored to Bangladesh's economic and social realities.

Habib and Molla reports that out-of-pocket healthcare spending amounts to 68.5% of total healthcare costs in Bangladesh which causes financial difficulties for numerous citizens [2]. They suggest raising government funding while improving coverage through existing health programs. Using only state-funded initiatives fails to address the constraints that stem from both fiscal capacity and administrative efficiency issues. A better solution combines mandatory insurance with voluntary options through digital financial access while employing behavioral economics to boost participation rates.

The scarcity of health insurance payments stems from people's distrust of financial institutions and their inability to see immediate advantages from coverage. Behavioral economics provides solutions through default enrollment models which require people to actively decline insurance coverage. Mobile banking platforms bKash and Nagad should integrate health insurance services through automatic micro-premium withdrawals which maintain user involvement while avoiding yearly payment requirements. Insurance communication becomes more effective through behavioral alignment when risk protection messages replace long-term health investment messaging.

A new approach would be the implementation of health insurance models supported by diaspora communities. The annual remittance amount of over $22 billion in Bangladesh lacks an organized system to direct this money toward healthcare funding. Insurance plans that allow expatriates to pay insurance premiums for family members and support community-based risk funds would enhance healthcare coverage among vulnerable populations. The Philippines and Mexico together with other countries have established successful diaspora-backed healthcare insurance systems which reduced healthcare expenses paid directly by patients to millions of people [3, 4].

Technological integration is also crucial. The article correctly identifies healthcare financing problems yet fails to investigate blockchain-based claims automation and AI-based adaptive pricing solutions. Blockchain technology brings transparency to operations while reducing fraud and streamlines claim settlements through automation to establish system-wide trust [5]. AI-driven underwriting systems allow for risk-based premium adjustments which enables insurance affordability for different income groups according to Rix [6]. Proof-of-concept deployments in Rwanda and Kenya show that these innovations can scale up for emerging markets [7, 8].

Bangladesh needs to prevent implementing models from high-income countries because their economic and institutional structures differ too much from its own. The country needs to prioritize a combined method that includes public-private collaborations with technological enhancements and behavioral economic practices. The implementation of mobile-based microinsurance and remittance-backed financing and blockchain claims processing requires initial testing through pilot programs for framework scalability purposes. The absence of forward-thinking strategies makes universal health coverage efforts stay theoretical instead of becoming practical initiatives.

MD. Faisal Ahmed: writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, resources, data curation.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

孟加拉国医疗保险改革:面向未来的方法
我写这封信是为了回应“在孟加拉国制定共同健康保险政策的迫切需要:展望” b[1]。这篇文章有效地强调了在孟加拉国建立全民健康保险制度的迫切需要。然而,它主要倡导在低收入和中等收入国家实施时面临挑战的传统解决方案。模式的转变是必要的——超越传统的国家主导模式,探索适合孟加拉国经济和社会现实的分散、技术驱动和行为信息战略。Habib和Molla报告说,自付医疗费用占孟加拉国总医疗费用的68.5%,这给许多公民造成了经济困难。他们建议在增加政府资金的同时,通过现有的医疗项目提高覆盖面。仅使用国家资助的计划无法解决财政能力和行政效率问题所带来的制约。更好的解决方案是通过数字金融渠道将强制性保险与自愿选择结合起来,同时利用行为经济学来提高参与率。医疗保险支付的短缺源于人们对金融机构的不信任,以及他们无法从保险中看到直接的好处。行为经济学通过默认登记模型提供了解决方案,该模型要求人们主动拒绝保险覆盖。移动银行平台bKash和Nagad应通过自动小额保费提取来整合医疗保险服务,从而保持用户参与,同时避免每年支付的要求。当风险保护信息取代长期健康投资信息时,保险沟通通过行为协调变得更加有效。一种新的做法是实施由侨民社区支持的医疗保险模式。孟加拉国每年超过220亿美元的汇款额缺乏一个有组织的系统来将这笔钱用于医疗保健资金。允许外籍人士为家庭成员支付保险费和支持社区风险基金的保险计划将扩大弱势群体的医疗保健覆盖面。菲律宾和墨西哥与其他国家一起建立了成功的侨民支持的医疗保险制度,减少了数百万人直接由患者支付的医疗费用[3,4]。技术整合也至关重要。这篇文章正确地识别了医疗融资问题,但未能调查基于区块链的索赔自动化和基于人工智能的自适应定价解决方案。区块链技术为业务带来了透明度,同时减少了欺诈行为,并通过自动化建立了全系统信任[5],简化了索赔结算。人工智能驱动的承保系统允许基于风险的保费调整,使不同收入群体的保险负担能力得以实现。卢旺达和肯尼亚的概念验证部署表明,这些创新可以推广到新兴市场[7,8]。孟加拉国需要防止采用高收入国家的模式,因为这些国家的经济和制度结构与孟加拉国差别太大。该国需要优先考虑一种综合方法,包括公私合作与技术改进和行为经济实践。基于移动的小额保险和汇款支持融资以及区块链索赔处理的实施需要通过试点项目进行初步测试,以达到框架可扩展性的目的。缺乏前瞻性战略使得全民健康覆盖工作停留在理论阶段,而不是成为实际行动。Faisal Ahmed:写作-审查和编辑,写作-原稿,概念化,方法论,调查,验证,资源,数据管理。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信