Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Trisha Gupta, Reshu Bashyal, Michelle Anagnostou, Sonia Dhanda, Joël Djagoun, Leonardo Manir Feitosa, Chloe E. R. Hatten, Sara Bronwen Hunter, Takudzwa S. Mutezo, Wahyu Nurbandi, Alejandra Pizarro Choy, Hannah N. K. Sackey, EJ Milner-Gulland, Thomasina E. E. Oldfield, Daniel W. S. Challender
{"title":"Resolving Uncertainties in the Legality of Wildlife Trade to Support Better Outcomes for Wildlife and People","authors":"Trisha Gupta,&nbsp;Reshu Bashyal,&nbsp;Michelle Anagnostou,&nbsp;Sonia Dhanda,&nbsp;Joël Djagoun,&nbsp;Leonardo Manir Feitosa,&nbsp;Chloe E. R. Hatten,&nbsp;Sara Bronwen Hunter,&nbsp;Takudzwa S. Mutezo,&nbsp;Wahyu Nurbandi,&nbsp;Alejandra Pizarro Choy,&nbsp;Hannah N. K. Sackey,&nbsp;EJ Milner-Gulland,&nbsp;Thomasina E. E. Oldfield,&nbsp;Daniel W. S. Challender","doi":"10.1111/conl.13110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildlife use and trade support the livelihoods of millions of people worldwide but also threaten thousands of species. Legal instruments, when effectively designed and implemented, can help regulate trade and mitigate negative impacts. However, activities along supply chains are rarely categorically legal or illegal, with considerable uncertainties regarding legality in the wildlife trade. These uncertainties can compromise the success of efforts to ensure, or improve, sustainability, but are often overlooked. Here, we categorize legal uncertainties in wildlife trade into three dimensions: institutional, operational, and perceptual. We explore their implications for sustainable management and discuss potential interventions to address them, drawing on examples from wildlife management and other sectors. Resolving these uncertainties can reduce unsustainable and illegal trade, strengthen traceability and enforcement, and promote equitable benefit-sharing among actors. Our findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to improve the clarity and effectiveness of wildlife trade management, advancing both conservation and socio-economic objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13110","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildlife use and trade support the livelihoods of millions of people worldwide but also threaten thousands of species. Legal instruments, when effectively designed and implemented, can help regulate trade and mitigate negative impacts. However, activities along supply chains are rarely categorically legal or illegal, with considerable uncertainties regarding legality in the wildlife trade. These uncertainties can compromise the success of efforts to ensure, or improve, sustainability, but are often overlooked. Here, we categorize legal uncertainties in wildlife trade into three dimensions: institutional, operational, and perceptual. We explore their implications for sustainable management and discuss potential interventions to address them, drawing on examples from wildlife management and other sectors. Resolving these uncertainties can reduce unsustainable and illegal trade, strengthen traceability and enforcement, and promote equitable benefit-sharing among actors. Our findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to improve the clarity and effectiveness of wildlife trade management, advancing both conservation and socio-economic objectives.

消除野生动物贸易合法性的不确定性,为野生动物和人类带来更好的结果
野生动物的利用和贸易支撑着全世界数百万人的生计,但也威胁着成千上万的物种。法律文书如果得到有效设计和执行,可以帮助规范贸易并减轻负面影响。然而,供应链上的活动很少是绝对合法或非法的,野生动物贸易的合法性存在相当大的不确定性。这些不确定性可能影响确保或改善可持续性努力的成功,但往往被忽视。在这里,我们将野生动物贸易中的法律不确定性分为三个维度:制度、操作和感知。我们以野生动物管理和其他部门为例,探讨了这些问题对可持续管理的影响,并讨论了解决这些问题的潜在干预措施。解决这些不确定性可以减少不可持续的非法贸易,加强可追溯性和执法,促进行为者之间公平的利益分享。我们的研究结果为政策制定者、从业者和研究人员提供了可行的见解,以提高野生动物贸易管理的清晰度和有效性,促进保护和社会经济目标的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信