Donatella Di Fabrizio, Thomas P. Cundy, Azad S. Najmaldin
{"title":"Paediatric Robotic Transperitoneal Heminephroureterectomy in Complete Duplicated Systems: Early and Long-Term Outcomes","authors":"Donatella Di Fabrizio, Thomas P. Cundy, Azad S. Najmaldin","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We present outcomes for paediatric robotic heminephroureterectomy from a prospective single-surgeon series.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Children who underwent this operation between July 2007 and March 2017 were reviewed from a prospective database.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 32 heminephroureterectomy (28 upper, 4 lower) for ureterocele (13), reflux (7), ectopic ureter (11), ureteric atresia (1). Co-morbidities (urological anomalies, recurrent infection, previous abdominal scarring) were common. Concomitant non-robotic procedures took place in 50%. Mean console time was 101 ± 30.2 min, hospital stay 29.5 ± 10.3 h. There were no conversions, intraoperative complications, and no remnant moiety function loss. Excision of diseased moiety calyces was complete in 30 (94%), incomplete in 2 (6%) who subsequently developed asymptomatic small marginal cysts. Eleven (34%) had total-ureterectomy, the remaining 21 (66%) were left with a ureteric stump. Postoperatively 3 (9%) females with residual stump (2 ureterocele, 1 bladder neck ectopia) and other urological anomalies underwent surgery (stump excision + reimplant refluxing remnant moiety ureter) for recurrent infection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In children, heminephroureterectomy is well suited to a robotic approach with favourable outcomes in our experience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
We present outcomes for paediatric robotic heminephroureterectomy from a prospective single-surgeon series.
Methods
Children who underwent this operation between July 2007 and March 2017 were reviewed from a prospective database.
Results
There were 32 heminephroureterectomy (28 upper, 4 lower) for ureterocele (13), reflux (7), ectopic ureter (11), ureteric atresia (1). Co-morbidities (urological anomalies, recurrent infection, previous abdominal scarring) were common. Concomitant non-robotic procedures took place in 50%. Mean console time was 101 ± 30.2 min, hospital stay 29.5 ± 10.3 h. There were no conversions, intraoperative complications, and no remnant moiety function loss. Excision of diseased moiety calyces was complete in 30 (94%), incomplete in 2 (6%) who subsequently developed asymptomatic small marginal cysts. Eleven (34%) had total-ureterectomy, the remaining 21 (66%) were left with a ureteric stump. Postoperatively 3 (9%) females with residual stump (2 ureterocele, 1 bladder neck ectopia) and other urological anomalies underwent surgery (stump excision + reimplant refluxing remnant moiety ureter) for recurrent infection.
Conclusion
In children, heminephroureterectomy is well suited to a robotic approach with favourable outcomes in our experience.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.