Optimizing Well Selection in Hydraulic Fracturing Using Advanced Machine Learning Approaches

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geofluids Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI:10.1155/gfl/9802201
Hai T. Nguyen, Tarek Al-Arbi Ganat, Tu V. Truong
{"title":"Optimizing Well Selection in Hydraulic Fracturing Using Advanced Machine Learning Approaches","authors":"Hai T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Tarek Al-Arbi Ganat,&nbsp;Tu V. Truong","doi":"10.1155/gfl/9802201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research evaluates the performance of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) in selecting well candidates for hydraulic fracturing (HF) in the Bach Ho oilfield, Vietnam. Traditional well selection often depends on expert judgment and deterministic criteria, which may be limited in uncertain and data-constrained reservoir environments. To address this limitation, machine learning models are applied to improve decision-making accuracy. A dataset of 41 wells was analyzed using permeability, porosity, skin factor, reservoir pressure, water cut, and reservoir thickness to predict post-HF daily production rates. Both models were trained and evaluated using RMSE, MSE, MAE, and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>. The ANFIS model demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving an RMSE of 4.24, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.93, and MAE of 4.24 on the training set. On the testing set, ANFIS achieved an RMSE of 40.44, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.81, and MAE of 30.33, outperforming the ANN model, which recorded an RMSE of 40.43, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.59, and MAE of 31.86. These results suggest that ANFIS is more effective in capturing nonlinear relationships and handling input uncertainties. The study presents a practical, interpretable tool for supporting petroleum engineers in prioritizing HF candidates, ultimately enhancing oil recovery and resource allocation in complex reservoir settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12512,"journal":{"name":"Geofluids","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/gfl/9802201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geofluids","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/gfl/9802201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research evaluates the performance of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) in selecting well candidates for hydraulic fracturing (HF) in the Bach Ho oilfield, Vietnam. Traditional well selection often depends on expert judgment and deterministic criteria, which may be limited in uncertain and data-constrained reservoir environments. To address this limitation, machine learning models are applied to improve decision-making accuracy. A dataset of 41 wells was analyzed using permeability, porosity, skin factor, reservoir pressure, water cut, and reservoir thickness to predict post-HF daily production rates. Both models were trained and evaluated using RMSE, MSE, MAE, and R2. The ANFIS model demonstrated superior accuracy, achieving an RMSE of 4.24, R2 of 0.93, and MAE of 4.24 on the training set. On the testing set, ANFIS achieved an RMSE of 40.44, R2 of 0.81, and MAE of 30.33, outperforming the ANN model, which recorded an RMSE of 40.43, R2 of 0.59, and MAE of 31.86. These results suggest that ANFIS is more effective in capturing nonlinear relationships and handling input uncertainties. The study presents a practical, interpretable tool for supporting petroleum engineers in prioritizing HF candidates, ultimately enhancing oil recovery and resource allocation in complex reservoir settings.

利用先进的机器学习方法优化水力压裂选井
本研究评估了人工神经网络(ann)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)在越南Bach Ho油田水力压裂(HF)候选井选择中的性能。传统的选井通常依赖于专家判断和确定性标准,这在不确定和数据受限的油藏环境中可能会受到限制。为了解决这一限制,机器学习模型被应用于提高决策准确性。对41口井的数据集进行了分析,包括渗透率、孔隙度、表皮系数、油藏压力、含水率和油藏厚度,以预测hf后的日产量。使用RMSE、MSE、MAE和R2对两个模型进行训练和评估。ANFIS模型在训练集上的RMSE为4.24,R2为0.93,MAE为4.24。在测试集上,ANFIS的RMSE为40.44,R2为0.81,MAE为30.33,优于ANN模型的RMSE为40.43,R2为0.59,MAE为31.86。这些结果表明,ANFIS在捕获非线性关系和处理输入不确定性方面更有效。该研究提供了一种实用的、可解释的工具,可帮助石油工程师确定HF候选物的优先级,最终提高复杂油藏的采收率和资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geofluids
Geofluids 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.60%
发文量
835
期刊介绍: Geofluids is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for original research and reviews relating to the role of fluids in mineralogical, chemical, and structural evolution of the Earth’s crust. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of sub-disciplines in which Geofluids research is carried out. To this end, authors are encouraged to stress the transdisciplinary relevance and international ramifications of their research. Authors are also encouraged to make their work as accessible as possible to readers from other sub-disciplines. Geofluids emphasizes chemical, microbial, and physical aspects of subsurface fluids throughout the Earth’s crust. Geofluids spans studies of groundwater, terrestrial or submarine geothermal fluids, basinal brines, petroleum, metamorphic waters or magmatic fluids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信