Precipitation of Weak Tropical Cyclone Mulan (2022): Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysics Parameterization Schemes

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jingyao Wang, Entao Yu, Jiehua Ma, Jun Wang, Dong Chen, Huijun Wang
{"title":"Precipitation of Weak Tropical Cyclone Mulan (2022): Sensitivity to Cumulus and Microphysics Parameterization Schemes","authors":"Jingyao Wang,&nbsp;Entao Yu,&nbsp;Jiehua Ma,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Dong Chen,&nbsp;Huijun Wang","doi":"10.1029/2024JD043011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous studies on precipitation caused by tropical cyclones (TCs) have largely focused on strong TCs while systematic research on weak systems remains limited. This study utilized the high-resolution (3 km) weather research and forecasting (WRF) model to investigate the sensitivity of heavy precipitation generated by weak TC Mulan (2022) over the South China Sea to cumulus and microphysics parameterization schemes. Six cumulus parameterizations and five microphysics schemes were configured with simulations validated against gauge observations. Results indicated that cumulus parameterizations had a significant influence on precipitation simulation while the microphysics schemes exhibited a relatively minor impact in this case. The combination of the New Tiedtke cumulus scheme and the WRF Single-Moment 6-class (WSM6) microphysics scheme yielded the best simulation of precipitation compared with the observations. Further investigation revealed that cumulus parameterizations modulated simulated large-scale circulation, moisture transportation, and vertical velocities. The New Tiedtke scheme reproduced a more northward TC track and an intensified southeast jet along the coast of Southeast China, aligning with the observed heavy precipitation zones and providing favorable dynamic and thermodynamic conditions for precipitation. In contrast, the Betts-Miller-Janjić (BMJ) scheme resolved cloud-environment interactions inadequately, resulting in excessive convection and latent heating, which amplified cumulus precipitation compared to the New Tiedtke scheme. Among the cumulus parameterization schemes, the Kain-Fritsch (KF) and BMJ schemes underperformed due to their overestimation of deep convection while the New Tiedtke and Multi-scale KF (MSKF) schemes showed better performance. This study provides a valuable reference for further precipitation prediction research in the study region and adjacent areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD043011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies on precipitation caused by tropical cyclones (TCs) have largely focused on strong TCs while systematic research on weak systems remains limited. This study utilized the high-resolution (3 km) weather research and forecasting (WRF) model to investigate the sensitivity of heavy precipitation generated by weak TC Mulan (2022) over the South China Sea to cumulus and microphysics parameterization schemes. Six cumulus parameterizations and five microphysics schemes were configured with simulations validated against gauge observations. Results indicated that cumulus parameterizations had a significant influence on precipitation simulation while the microphysics schemes exhibited a relatively minor impact in this case. The combination of the New Tiedtke cumulus scheme and the WRF Single-Moment 6-class (WSM6) microphysics scheme yielded the best simulation of precipitation compared with the observations. Further investigation revealed that cumulus parameterizations modulated simulated large-scale circulation, moisture transportation, and vertical velocities. The New Tiedtke scheme reproduced a more northward TC track and an intensified southeast jet along the coast of Southeast China, aligning with the observed heavy precipitation zones and providing favorable dynamic and thermodynamic conditions for precipitation. In contrast, the Betts-Miller-Janjić (BMJ) scheme resolved cloud-environment interactions inadequately, resulting in excessive convection and latent heating, which amplified cumulus precipitation compared to the New Tiedtke scheme. Among the cumulus parameterization schemes, the Kain-Fritsch (KF) and BMJ schemes underperformed due to their overestimation of deep convection while the New Tiedtke and Multi-scale KF (MSKF) schemes showed better performance. This study provides a valuable reference for further precipitation prediction research in the study region and adjacent areas.

弱热带气旋“花木兰”降水(2022):对积云和微物理参数化方案的敏感性
以往关于热带气旋降水的研究主要集中在强热带气旋上,而对弱热带气旋的系统研究还很有限。利用高分辨率(3 km)天气研究与预报(WRF)模式,研究了弱TC花木兰(2022)对南海积云和微物理参数化方案的敏感性。配置了6种积云参数化方案和5种微物理方案,并对观测结果进行了模拟验证。结果表明,积云参数化对降水模拟有显著影响,而微物理方案对降水模拟的影响相对较小。新Tiedtke积云方案与WRF单矩6级(WSM6)微物理方案相结合对降水的模拟效果与观测值比较最好。进一步的研究表明,积云参数化调节了模拟大尺度环流、水汽输送和垂直速度。新Tiedtke方案重现了一条偏北的TC路径和东南急流,与观测到的强降水带对齐,为降水提供了有利的动力和热力条件。相比之下,betts - miller - janjiki (BMJ)方案没有充分解决云-环境相互作用,导致对流和潜热过多,与New Tiedtke方案相比,这增加了积云降水。在积云参数化方案中,Kain-Fritsch (KF)和BMJ (BMJ)方案由于对深层对流的过高估计而表现不佳,而New Tiedtke和多尺度KF (MSKF)方案表现较好。本研究为进一步开展研究区及邻区降水预报研究提供了有价值的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信