Recovery Profiles and Well-Being Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Various Anaesthesia Techniques: A Systematic Review

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Abdullah K. Bubshait
{"title":"Recovery Profiles and Well-Being Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Various Anaesthesia Techniques: A Systematic Review","authors":"Abdullah K. Bubshait","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>An appropriate anaesthesia technique is considered for the patient's health status to ensure a painless recovery. This study explored the important role of anesthesia selection in improving recovery outcomes and patient well-being across diverse surgical settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employed a systematic literature review methodology. Different databases, including Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed, were used to search for potential studies. A total of 20 studies were selected for qualitative analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that general anesthesia is widely favored. However, certain procedures stressed the efficacy of spinal and regional approaches in managing pain and promoting faster recovery. Intravenous anesthetics such as propofol and newer agents like remimazolam and ciprofol are associated with improved recovery rates in high-risk patients, providing hemodynamic stability and reducing the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Furthermore, Opioid-sparing and xenon-based anesthetics also contributed to better recovery profiles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Anesthesia choice plays a critical role in patient recovery, with tailored techniques enhancing outcomes and reducing adverse effects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70937","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim

An appropriate anaesthesia technique is considered for the patient's health status to ensure a painless recovery. This study explored the important role of anesthesia selection in improving recovery outcomes and patient well-being across diverse surgical settings.

Methods

This study employed a systematic literature review methodology. Different databases, including Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed, were used to search for potential studies. A total of 20 studies were selected for qualitative analysis.

Results

We found that general anesthesia is widely favored. However, certain procedures stressed the efficacy of spinal and regional approaches in managing pain and promoting faster recovery. Intravenous anesthetics such as propofol and newer agents like remimazolam and ciprofol are associated with improved recovery rates in high-risk patients, providing hemodynamic stability and reducing the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Furthermore, Opioid-sparing and xenon-based anesthetics also contributed to better recovery profiles.

Conclusion

Anesthesia choice plays a critical role in patient recovery, with tailored techniques enhancing outcomes and reducing adverse effects.

接受各种麻醉技术的患者的恢复概况和健康结果:系统回顾
背景与目的根据患者的健康状况选择合适的麻醉技术以确保无痛恢复。本研究探讨了麻醉选择在改善不同手术环境下的恢复结果和患者幸福感方面的重要作用。方法采用系统文献复习法。不同的数据库,包括Scopus,谷歌Scholar和PubMed,被用来搜索潜在的研究。共选取20项研究进行定性分析。结果发现全身麻醉是一种普遍适用的麻醉方式。然而,某些手术强调脊柱和局部入路在控制疼痛和促进更快恢复方面的功效。静脉麻醉药,如异丙酚和较新的药物,如雷马唑仑和环丙酚,可以提高高危患者的恢复率,提供血液动力学稳定性,减少术后恶心和呕吐的风险。此外,阿片类药物节约和氙基麻醉药也有助于更好的恢复概况。结论麻醉的选择对患者的康复起着至关重要的作用,有针对性的麻醉可以提高预后,减少不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信