Dona Iresha Gurusinghe , Usha Iyer-Raniga , Trivess Moore
{"title":"Practical considerations of circular economy strategies in the residential sector in Australia using the ReSOLVE Framework","authors":"Dona Iresha Gurusinghe , Usha Iyer-Raniga , Trivess Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The residential sector remains one of the highest greenhouse gas-emitting and resource-intensive sectors globally, including Australia. This arises from challenges in implementing a Circular Economy (CE) model, which optimises resource value by minimising waste and reducing the need for new materials. The fragmented focus by researchers, policymakers and the construction industry on individual life cycle stages, building layers, or technologies in CE strategies limits a holistic understanding of CE implementation. This study introduces a novel, comprehensive evaluation of CE strategies in Australia's residential sector by applying the ReSOLVE framework across seven building layers, addressing fragmentation in prior research by combining systematic and narrative literature reviews to explore theoretical and practical CE strategies. The systematic literature review identified 725 global studies, which, after screening, were narrowed to 68 and 37 publications were identified from the narrative review. The study highlights the significance of CE strategies, including design for deconstruction, reuse, digital tools, off-site construction, and stock management. However, broader adoption of existing strategies remains essential. Successful adoption requires policy alignment, CE incentives, stakeholder collaboration, sector-specific guidelines and behavioural changes. The findings highlight gaps in practical interventions, guiding policymakers while benefiting researchers and construction stakeholders. Future research should focus on reuse, policy interventions, and behavioural dynamics. Despite the focus on the Australian context, the implications are relevant globally<strong>.</strong></div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 113279"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325007590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The residential sector remains one of the highest greenhouse gas-emitting and resource-intensive sectors globally, including Australia. This arises from challenges in implementing a Circular Economy (CE) model, which optimises resource value by minimising waste and reducing the need for new materials. The fragmented focus by researchers, policymakers and the construction industry on individual life cycle stages, building layers, or technologies in CE strategies limits a holistic understanding of CE implementation. This study introduces a novel, comprehensive evaluation of CE strategies in Australia's residential sector by applying the ReSOLVE framework across seven building layers, addressing fragmentation in prior research by combining systematic and narrative literature reviews to explore theoretical and practical CE strategies. The systematic literature review identified 725 global studies, which, after screening, were narrowed to 68 and 37 publications were identified from the narrative review. The study highlights the significance of CE strategies, including design for deconstruction, reuse, digital tools, off-site construction, and stock management. However, broader adoption of existing strategies remains essential. Successful adoption requires policy alignment, CE incentives, stakeholder collaboration, sector-specific guidelines and behavioural changes. The findings highlight gaps in practical interventions, guiding policymakers while benefiting researchers and construction stakeholders. Future research should focus on reuse, policy interventions, and behavioural dynamics. Despite the focus on the Australian context, the implications are relevant globally.
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.