Practical considerations of circular economy strategies in the residential sector in Australia using the ReSOLVE Framework

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Dona Iresha Gurusinghe , Usha Iyer-Raniga , Trivess Moore
{"title":"Practical considerations of circular economy strategies in the residential sector in Australia using the ReSOLVE Framework","authors":"Dona Iresha Gurusinghe ,&nbsp;Usha Iyer-Raniga ,&nbsp;Trivess Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The residential sector remains one of the highest greenhouse gas-emitting and resource-intensive sectors globally, including Australia. This arises from challenges in implementing a Circular Economy (CE) model, which optimises resource value by minimising waste and reducing the need for new materials. The fragmented focus by researchers, policymakers and the construction industry on individual life cycle stages, building layers, or technologies in CE strategies limits a holistic understanding of CE implementation. This study introduces a novel, comprehensive evaluation of CE strategies in Australia's residential sector by applying the ReSOLVE framework across seven building layers, addressing fragmentation in prior research by combining systematic and narrative literature reviews to explore theoretical and practical CE strategies. The systematic literature review identified 725 global studies, which, after screening, were narrowed to 68 and 37 publications were identified from the narrative review. The study highlights the significance of CE strategies, including design for deconstruction, reuse, digital tools, off-site construction, and stock management. However, broader adoption of existing strategies remains essential. Successful adoption requires policy alignment, CE incentives, stakeholder collaboration, sector-specific guidelines and behavioural changes. The findings highlight gaps in practical interventions, guiding policymakers while benefiting researchers and construction stakeholders. Future research should focus on reuse, policy interventions, and behavioural dynamics. Despite the focus on the Australian context, the implications are relevant globally<strong>.</strong></div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 113279"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325007590","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The residential sector remains one of the highest greenhouse gas-emitting and resource-intensive sectors globally, including Australia. This arises from challenges in implementing a Circular Economy (CE) model, which optimises resource value by minimising waste and reducing the need for new materials. The fragmented focus by researchers, policymakers and the construction industry on individual life cycle stages, building layers, or technologies in CE strategies limits a holistic understanding of CE implementation. This study introduces a novel, comprehensive evaluation of CE strategies in Australia's residential sector by applying the ReSOLVE framework across seven building layers, addressing fragmentation in prior research by combining systematic and narrative literature reviews to explore theoretical and practical CE strategies. The systematic literature review identified 725 global studies, which, after screening, were narrowed to 68 and 37 publications were identified from the narrative review. The study highlights the significance of CE strategies, including design for deconstruction, reuse, digital tools, off-site construction, and stock management. However, broader adoption of existing strategies remains essential. Successful adoption requires policy alignment, CE incentives, stakeholder collaboration, sector-specific guidelines and behavioural changes. The findings highlight gaps in practical interventions, guiding policymakers while benefiting researchers and construction stakeholders. Future research should focus on reuse, policy interventions, and behavioural dynamics. Despite the focus on the Australian context, the implications are relevant globally.
利用ReSOLVE框架对澳大利亚住宅部门循环经济战略的实际考虑
住宅行业仍然是全球温室气体排放和资源密集型行业之一,包括澳大利亚。这源于实施循环经济(CE)模式的挑战,该模式通过最大限度地减少浪费和减少对新材料的需求来优化资源价值。研究人员、政策制定者和建筑行业对CE战略中单个生命周期阶段、建筑层或技术的分散关注,限制了对CE实施的整体理解。本研究通过在七个建筑层中应用ReSOLVE框架,对澳大利亚住宅部门的建筑节能策略进行了新颖、全面的评估,通过结合系统和叙事文献综述来探索理论和实践的建筑节能策略,解决了先前研究中的碎片化问题。系统文献综述确定了725项全球研究,经过筛选,这些研究缩小到68项,从叙述性综述中确定了37项出版物。该研究强调了CE策略的重要性,包括解构设计、重用、数字工具、非现场施工和库存管理。然而,更广泛地采用现有战略仍然至关重要。成功的采用需要政策协调、环保激励、利益相关者合作、针对特定行业的指导方针和行为改变。这些发现突出了实际干预措施的差距,指导了政策制定者,同时使研究人员和建设利益相关者受益。未来的研究应该集中在再利用、政策干预和行为动力学上。尽管关注的是澳大利亚的情况,但其影响与全球相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信