Impact of age and sex on the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of the ARMANI phase III trial
R. Fazio , G. Randon , F. Bergamo , F. Palermo , S. Tamberi , E. Giommoni , S. Di Donato , L. Fornaro , O. Brunetti , F. De Vita , M. Valgiusti , S.M. Gobba , A. Spallanzani , S. Murgioni , V. Bethaz , A. Strippoli , T.P. Latiano , G.G. Cardellino , C. Ceccon , A. Raimondi , F. Pietrantonio
{"title":"Impact of age and sex on the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of the ARMANI phase III trial","authors":"R. Fazio , G. Randon , F. Bergamo , F. Palermo , S. Tamberi , E. Giommoni , S. Di Donato , L. Fornaro , O. Brunetti , F. De Vita , M. Valgiusti , S.M. Gobba , A. Spallanzani , S. Murgioni , V. Bethaz , A. Strippoli , T.P. Latiano , G.G. Cardellino , C. Ceccon , A. Raimondi , F. Pietrantonio","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a growing interest in optimizing the therapeutic management of older cancer patients as well as understanding the sex-specific differences in terms of efficacy and safety of cancer treatments. However, limited data are available on the initial therapy of patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The ARMANI phase III trial showed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab switch maintenance (arm A) versus the continuation of first-line oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine (arm B) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. We conducted a subgroup analysis aimed at assessing the differences in efficacy, safety and quality of life (QoL) according to age (<70 versus ≥70 years) and sex.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences in terms of PFS (<em>P</em> = 0.757), OS (<em>P</em> = 0.588) and overall response rates (ORRs) (<em>P</em> = 0.238) were observed between older and younger patients. No significant differences in PFS (<em>P</em> = 0.646), OS (<em>P</em> = 0.858) and ORRs (<em>P</em> = 0.649) were observed between females and males. The effect of treatment arm on survival outcomes was similar across age (<em>P</em> = 0.094) and sex groups (<em>P</em> = 0.469). Looking at specific adverse events, peripheral neuropathy occurred more frequently in younger patients (<em>P</em> = 0.020), anaemia in older patients (<em>P</em> = 0.044) and hand-foot syndrome in women (<em>P</em> = 0.021). Older patients were less likely to receive a post-discontinuation treatment (<em>P</em> = 0.010), especially in arm B (<em>P</em> = 0.026). The impact on QoL was better in arm A, irrespective of age and sex.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ARMANI trial supported the benefit of the investigated switch maintenance strategy irrespective of age and sex.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 7","pages":"Article 105329"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925011986","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is a growing interest in optimizing the therapeutic management of older cancer patients as well as understanding the sex-specific differences in terms of efficacy and safety of cancer treatments. However, limited data are available on the initial therapy of patients with advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer.
Materials and methods
The ARMANI phase III trial showed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab switch maintenance (arm A) versus the continuation of first-line oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine (arm B) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. We conducted a subgroup analysis aimed at assessing the differences in efficacy, safety and quality of life (QoL) according to age (<70 versus ≥70 years) and sex.
Results
No significant differences in terms of PFS (P = 0.757), OS (P = 0.588) and overall response rates (ORRs) (P = 0.238) were observed between older and younger patients. No significant differences in PFS (P = 0.646), OS (P = 0.858) and ORRs (P = 0.649) were observed between females and males. The effect of treatment arm on survival outcomes was similar across age (P = 0.094) and sex groups (P = 0.469). Looking at specific adverse events, peripheral neuropathy occurred more frequently in younger patients (P = 0.020), anaemia in older patients (P = 0.044) and hand-foot syndrome in women (P = 0.021). Older patients were less likely to receive a post-discontinuation treatment (P = 0.010), especially in arm B (P = 0.026). The impact on QoL was better in arm A, irrespective of age and sex.
Conclusion
The ARMANI trial supported the benefit of the investigated switch maintenance strategy irrespective of age and sex.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.