{"title":"Navigating power dynamics in the public sector through AI-driven algorithmic decision-making","authors":"Kamran Mahroof , Vishanth Weerakkody , Zahid Hussain , Uthayasankar Sivarajah","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2025.102053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public sector institutions are under increasing pressure to deliver greater public value through disruptive technologies, despite ongoing pressures. In response to evolving technological change and an abundance of information, many public sector organisations have adopted Artificial Intelligence (AI) to improve decision-making and generate social value. While AI's role in public administration is gaining attention, little is known about how its use alters internal power dynamics. This research uses a qualitative case study approach, drawing on 30 semi-structured interviews with operational managers and various analysts in a large public institution to explore how AI influences power relations. Findings reveal that AI use creates tensions among operational managers, organisation-wide analysts and the increasingly influential hybrid/in-house analysts who possess both technical and institutional expertise. The study presents and empirically validates the AI Power Enactment Framework and introduces the AI Power Matrix, providing policymakers with a structured tool to evaluate AI projects. These insights can inform targeted funding strategies and capacity building, helping to lessen dependence on hybrid analysts and enhance the success of AI implementation in the public sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"42 3","pages":"Article 102053"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X25000474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public sector institutions are under increasing pressure to deliver greater public value through disruptive technologies, despite ongoing pressures. In response to evolving technological change and an abundance of information, many public sector organisations have adopted Artificial Intelligence (AI) to improve decision-making and generate social value. While AI's role in public administration is gaining attention, little is known about how its use alters internal power dynamics. This research uses a qualitative case study approach, drawing on 30 semi-structured interviews with operational managers and various analysts in a large public institution to explore how AI influences power relations. Findings reveal that AI use creates tensions among operational managers, organisation-wide analysts and the increasingly influential hybrid/in-house analysts who possess both technical and institutional expertise. The study presents and empirically validates the AI Power Enactment Framework and introduces the AI Power Matrix, providing policymakers with a structured tool to evaluate AI projects. These insights can inform targeted funding strategies and capacity building, helping to lessen dependence on hybrid analysts and enhance the success of AI implementation in the public sector.
期刊介绍:
Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.