SaRVO framework for urban water utilities: Building resilient, liveable, and sustainable cities

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chandni Bedi , Arun Kansal , Pierre Mukheibir
{"title":"SaRVO framework for urban water utilities: Building resilient, liveable, and sustainable cities","authors":"Chandni Bedi ,&nbsp;Arun Kansal ,&nbsp;Pierre Mukheibir","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People’s engagement with policies and management systems influences their effectiveness in making cities resilient, liveable and sustainable. It is, therefore, crucial to understand people's perceptions and values. We used a novel Stakeholders and actors, Relationships, Values and Outcomes – Urban Water Management (SaRVO-UWM) framework and fuzzy cognitive mapping to examine the differences in perceptions of, and the values attached to, water as a scarce resource by domestic water users living in three settlement types, namely mainstream areas in cities, slums, and peri-urban areas, within Gurugram City, in the northern Indian state of Haryana in Global South. The perceptions and values were ascertained through FGDs to reveal the participants’ values on the liveability concepts of urban water management systems derived from multiple sources. The assessment revealed the differences in the prioritization of values attached to water among the three groups. The relevant drivers across environmental, social, technical, and economic factors were identified with overlaps between them. The study highlights the need for diverse adaptive strategies, such as investing in a secure water supply and promoting mandatory water harvesting, to improve liveability across different urban settlements. It emphasizes the importance of incorporating water-related traditions into urban water management and suggests effective communication tailored to each settlement to foster pro-planet behaviour. Policymakers are encouraged to develop affordable pricing mechanisms for reliable water use and design localized policies that align with global frameworks, promoting equity in building resilient and sustainable cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125001510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People’s engagement with policies and management systems influences their effectiveness in making cities resilient, liveable and sustainable. It is, therefore, crucial to understand people's perceptions and values. We used a novel Stakeholders and actors, Relationships, Values and Outcomes – Urban Water Management (SaRVO-UWM) framework and fuzzy cognitive mapping to examine the differences in perceptions of, and the values attached to, water as a scarce resource by domestic water users living in three settlement types, namely mainstream areas in cities, slums, and peri-urban areas, within Gurugram City, in the northern Indian state of Haryana in Global South. The perceptions and values were ascertained through FGDs to reveal the participants’ values on the liveability concepts of urban water management systems derived from multiple sources. The assessment revealed the differences in the prioritization of values attached to water among the three groups. The relevant drivers across environmental, social, technical, and economic factors were identified with overlaps between them. The study highlights the need for diverse adaptive strategies, such as investing in a secure water supply and promoting mandatory water harvesting, to improve liveability across different urban settlements. It emphasizes the importance of incorporating water-related traditions into urban water management and suggests effective communication tailored to each settlement to foster pro-planet behaviour. Policymakers are encouraged to develop affordable pricing mechanisms for reliable water use and design localized policies that align with global frameworks, promoting equity in building resilient and sustainable cities.
城市水务SaRVO框架:建设有弹性、宜居和可持续发展的城市
人们对政策和管理系统的参与影响其在使城市具有复原力、宜居性和可持续性方面的有效性。因此,了解人们的观念和价值观是至关重要的。我们使用了一个新颖的利益相关者和行为者、关系、价值和结果——城市水管理(SaRVO-UWM)框架和模糊认知映射来研究生活在三种住区类型的家庭用水用户对水作为稀缺资源的看法和价值的差异,即城市的主流地区、贫民窟和城郊地区,位于印度南部哈里亚纳邦北部的Gurugram市。通过fgd确定了感知和价值观,以揭示参与者对来自多个来源的城市水管理系统的宜居性概念的价值观。评估结果显示,三组人对水的重视程度不同。环境、社会、技术和经济因素的相关驱动因素之间存在重叠。该研究强调需要采取多种适应性策略,例如投资于安全供水和促进强制性集水,以改善不同城市住区的宜居性。它强调将与水有关的传统纳入城市水管理的重要性,并建议针对每个住区进行有效的沟通,以促进有利于地球的行为。鼓励政策制定者制定负担得起的可靠用水定价机制,设计符合全球框架的地方政策,促进建设有韧性和可持续城市的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信