Biodegradable orthopaedic implants: A systematic review of in vitro and in vivo evaluations of magnesium, iron, and zinc alloys

IF 6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zatul Faqihah Mohd Salaha , Nik Nur Ain Azrin Abdullah , Kar Fei Chan , Hong-Seng Gan , Mohd Zamri Mohd Yusop , Muhammad Hanif Ramlee
{"title":"Biodegradable orthopaedic implants: A systematic review of in vitro and in vivo evaluations of magnesium, iron, and zinc alloys","authors":"Zatul Faqihah Mohd Salaha ,&nbsp;Nik Nur Ain Azrin Abdullah ,&nbsp;Kar Fei Chan ,&nbsp;Hong-Seng Gan ,&nbsp;Mohd Zamri Mohd Yusop ,&nbsp;Muhammad Hanif Ramlee","doi":"10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the field of orthopaedics, biodegradable metallic implants have attracted substantial interest due to their potential to reduce the need for implant removal surgeries, facilitate the regeneration of native tissue, and reduce the risk of long-term complications. Although numerous literatures have been published that emphasise the successful results of biodegradable metallic implants, none of them have specifically addressed the advantages and disadvantages of the three superior metals: magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn). Furthermore, before being implanted in the human body, these metallic implants must undergo <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> testing to ensure their compatibility. Therefore, this article reviewed the most recent <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> experiments conducted on biodegradable metallic implants, emphasising the degradation behaviour, biocompatibility, loading conditions, boundary conditions, advantages, and disadvantages of the materials. In summary, zinc-based alloys are superior to Mg and Fe in terms of strength and a favourable strength-to-weight ratio, despite the fact that they have demonstrated biocompatibility and mechanical properties that are appropriate for biomedical implants. Nevertheless, in order to guarantee the mechanical properties of materials are reliable, it is necessary to implement an alternative method, such as Computer-Aided Design (CAD) simulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36919,"journal":{"name":"Results in Engineering","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 105746"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123025018171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of orthopaedics, biodegradable metallic implants have attracted substantial interest due to their potential to reduce the need for implant removal surgeries, facilitate the regeneration of native tissue, and reduce the risk of long-term complications. Although numerous literatures have been published that emphasise the successful results of biodegradable metallic implants, none of them have specifically addressed the advantages and disadvantages of the three superior metals: magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn). Furthermore, before being implanted in the human body, these metallic implants must undergo in vitro and in vivo testing to ensure their compatibility. Therefore, this article reviewed the most recent in vitro and in vivo experiments conducted on biodegradable metallic implants, emphasising the degradation behaviour, biocompatibility, loading conditions, boundary conditions, advantages, and disadvantages of the materials. In summary, zinc-based alloys are superior to Mg and Fe in terms of strength and a favourable strength-to-weight ratio, despite the fact that they have demonstrated biocompatibility and mechanical properties that are appropriate for biomedical implants. Nevertheless, in order to guarantee the mechanical properties of materials are reliable, it is necessary to implement an alternative method, such as Computer-Aided Design (CAD) simulation.
可生物降解的骨科植入物:对镁、铁和锌合金的体内和体外评估的系统回顾
在骨科领域,可生物降解的金属植入物由于其潜在的减少对植入物移除手术的需求,促进原生组织的再生和降低长期并发症的风险而引起了极大的兴趣。尽管已经发表了大量的文献,强调生物可降解金属植入物的成功结果,但没有一篇文献专门讨论了三种优质金属:镁(Mg)、铁(Fe)和锌(Zn)的优缺点。此外,在植入人体之前,这些金属植入物必须经过体外和体内测试,以确保它们的相容性。因此,本文综述了近年来生物可降解金属植入体的体外和体内实验,重点介绍了材料的降解行为、生物相容性、加载条件、边界条件、优缺点。总之,锌基合金在强度和有利的强度重量比方面优于Mg和Fe,尽管它们已经证明了适合生物医学植入物的生物相容性和机械性能。然而,为了保证材料的力学性能是可靠的,有必要实施一种替代方法,如计算机辅助设计(CAD)仿真。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Results in Engineering
Results in Engineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
34.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信