Promoting social sustainability: Psychological and contextual factors influencing mobility scooter adoption among older adults in a developing country

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ala Kordrostami , Javad Esmailpour , Kayvan Aghabayk , Nirajan Shiwakoti
{"title":"Promoting social sustainability: Psychological and contextual factors influencing mobility scooter adoption among older adults in a developing country","authors":"Ala Kordrostami ,&nbsp;Javad Esmailpour ,&nbsp;Kayvan Aghabayk ,&nbsp;Nirajan Shiwakoti","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equitable transportation for minority groups, such as older generations, is fundamental to social sustainability, as active participation in society improves their quality of life. Mobility scooters have the potential to promote independence among older adults so that they can participate in society alongside reducing dependency on motor vehicles, contributing to more sustainable urban mobility solutions. However, in developing countries, existing literature reveals a gap in quantitively assessing and comparing different factors influencing their adoption, especially psychological factors, such as external shame. This study examines mobility scooter acceptance among the elderly (aged 60+), in Tehran, a large metropolitan area, and Gorgan, a small city in Iran. An extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with seven constructs, including the novel introduction of \"Shame,\" was assessed using data from 805 respondents through face-to-face interviews. The second part of the study measured observed heterogeneity using multi-group analysis (MGA) to examine the effects of two moderators: city size and daily physical challenges. The results highlight “Shame” as a predictor of mobility scooter acceptance, with different impacts between the two cities. In the small city, “Shame” negatively moderates other constructs, while in the large city, perceived usefulness is a more decisive predictor; suggesting that practicality holds greater sway in such contexts. These results highlight the importance of psychological factors, especially \"Shame,\" in predicting mobility scooter acceptance based on city size. In light of these findings, tailored policies and strategies are proposed to address the unique psychological and contextual barriers faced by older adults in small and large cities, advancing social equity in sustainable transportation for the elderly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825004435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equitable transportation for minority groups, such as older generations, is fundamental to social sustainability, as active participation in society improves their quality of life. Mobility scooters have the potential to promote independence among older adults so that they can participate in society alongside reducing dependency on motor vehicles, contributing to more sustainable urban mobility solutions. However, in developing countries, existing literature reveals a gap in quantitively assessing and comparing different factors influencing their adoption, especially psychological factors, such as external shame. This study examines mobility scooter acceptance among the elderly (aged 60+), in Tehran, a large metropolitan area, and Gorgan, a small city in Iran. An extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with seven constructs, including the novel introduction of "Shame," was assessed using data from 805 respondents through face-to-face interviews. The second part of the study measured observed heterogeneity using multi-group analysis (MGA) to examine the effects of two moderators: city size and daily physical challenges. The results highlight “Shame” as a predictor of mobility scooter acceptance, with different impacts between the two cities. In the small city, “Shame” negatively moderates other constructs, while in the large city, perceived usefulness is a more decisive predictor; suggesting that practicality holds greater sway in such contexts. These results highlight the importance of psychological factors, especially "Shame," in predicting mobility scooter acceptance based on city size. In light of these findings, tailored policies and strategies are proposed to address the unique psychological and contextual barriers faced by older adults in small and large cities, advancing social equity in sustainable transportation for the elderly.
促进社会可持续性:影响发展中国家老年人采用机动滑板车的心理和环境因素
老年人等少数群体享有公平的交通是社会可持续性的根本,因为积极参与社会可以提高他们的生活素质。电动滑板车有可能促进老年人的独立性,使他们能够参与社会,同时减少对机动车辆的依赖,为更可持续的城市交通解决方案做出贡献。然而,在发展中国家,现有文献表明,在定量评估和比较影响其采用的不同因素方面存在差距,特别是心理因素,如外部羞耻。这项研究调查了老年人(60岁以上)对代步车的接受程度,德黑兰是一个大城市,戈尔根是一个小城市。一个扩展的技术接受模型(TAM)有七个构式,包括新引入的“羞耻”,通过面对面访谈使用805名受访者的数据进行评估。研究的第二部分使用多组分析(MGA)测量观察到的异质性,以检验两个调节因子:城市规模和日常身体挑战的影响。研究结果强调,“羞耻”可以预测人们对电动滑板车的接受程度,但在两个城市之间的影响有所不同。在小城市,“羞耻”负向调节其他构念,而在大城市,感知有用性是更决定性的预测因子;这表明在这种情况下,实用性更有影响力。这些结果强调了心理因素的重要性,尤其是“羞耻”,在预测基于城市规模的电动滑板车接受度方面。根据这些发现,提出了针对性的政策和策略,以解决小城市和大城市老年人面临的独特心理和环境障碍,促进老年人可持续交通的社会公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信