Sex disparities in diagnostic workup of benign pancreaticobiliary disease before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

iGIE Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2025.03.007
Sarah Dwyer Holland MD, MS , Garrett Weskamp MD , Gabriel Brutico MD, MBS , Ford Holland MS , David L. Diehl MD , Anjuli Luthra MD , Shaffer Mok MD, MBS
{"title":"Sex disparities in diagnostic workup of benign pancreaticobiliary disease before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography","authors":"Sarah Dwyer Holland MD, MS ,&nbsp;Garrett Weskamp MD ,&nbsp;Gabriel Brutico MD, MBS ,&nbsp;Ford Holland MS ,&nbsp;David L. Diehl MD ,&nbsp;Anjuli Luthra MD ,&nbsp;Shaffer Mok MD, MBS","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2025.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Women face diagnostic delays in the workup of many diseases. We investigated whether there are sex-based disparities in the diagnostic workup of patients with benign pancreaticobiliary pathologies requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing ERCP from December 2017 to 2021 for benign pancreaticobiliary pathologies. We assessed differences between males and females in days from presentation to ERCP, number of healthcare visits before ERCP, symptoms, and diagnostic workup at first visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred twenty-eight patients (68 female patients) were identified. Eighteen percent of male patients initially presented with fever or chills versus 6% of female patients (<em>P</em> = .03), but otherwise there were no differences in symptoms. There was no difference between sexes in number of encounters or days from presentation until ERCP (<em>P</em> = .5). Significant differences occurred in the initial diagnostic evaluation. Male patients had liver chemistry testing in 98% of initial visits versus 85% of female patients (<em>P</em> = .01), and 95% had imaging ordered at first visit versus 82% of female patients (<em>P</em> = .03). Excluding febrile patients, male patients remained more likely to have laboratory (<em>P</em> = .02) and imaging evaluations (<em>P</em> = .05) at the initial visit. Thirteen female patients (19%) had an inadequate workup at the first visit for benign pancreaticobiliary conditions compared with 3 male patients (5%, <em>P</em> = .02).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We did not observe sex-based delays in time from presentation to ERCP in our sample; however, women were less likely to have adequate workup for benign pancreaticobiliary conditions at the first visit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 134-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708625000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Women face diagnostic delays in the workup of many diseases. We investigated whether there are sex-based disparities in the diagnostic workup of patients with benign pancreaticobiliary pathologies requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients undergoing ERCP from December 2017 to 2021 for benign pancreaticobiliary pathologies. We assessed differences between males and females in days from presentation to ERCP, number of healthcare visits before ERCP, symptoms, and diagnostic workup at first visit.

Results

One hundred twenty-eight patients (68 female patients) were identified. Eighteen percent of male patients initially presented with fever or chills versus 6% of female patients (P = .03), but otherwise there were no differences in symptoms. There was no difference between sexes in number of encounters or days from presentation until ERCP (P = .5). Significant differences occurred in the initial diagnostic evaluation. Male patients had liver chemistry testing in 98% of initial visits versus 85% of female patients (P = .01), and 95% had imaging ordered at first visit versus 82% of female patients (P = .03). Excluding febrile patients, male patients remained more likely to have laboratory (P = .02) and imaging evaluations (P = .05) at the initial visit. Thirteen female patients (19%) had an inadequate workup at the first visit for benign pancreaticobiliary conditions compared with 3 male patients (5%, P = .02).

Conclusions

We did not observe sex-based delays in time from presentation to ERCP in our sample; however, women were less likely to have adequate workup for benign pancreaticobiliary conditions at the first visit.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影前良性胰胆管疾病诊断的性别差异
背景和目的妇女在许多疾病的检查中面临诊断延误。我们调查了在需要内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)的良性胰胆管病变患者的诊断工作中是否存在基于性别的差异。方法我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2017年12月至2021年接受ERCP治疗的良性胰胆管病变患者。我们评估了男性和女性在从出现到ERCP的天数、ERCP前的医疗保健就诊次数、症状和首次就诊时的诊断检查方面的差异。结果共检出128例患者,其中女性68例。18%的男性患者最初表现为发烧或发冷,而女性患者为6% (P = .03),但除此之外,症状没有差异。从出现到ERCP的接触次数或天数在性别之间没有差异(P = 0.5)。在最初的诊断评估中出现了显著的差异。男性患者首次就诊时进行肝化学检查的比例为98%,女性患者为85% (P = 0.01), 95%的患者首次就诊时进行影像学检查,而女性患者为82% (P = 0.03)。除发热患者外,男性患者在初次就诊时仍更有可能进行实验室(P = 0.02)和影像学评估(P = 0.05)。13名女性患者(19%)在首次就诊时对良性胰胆管疾病的检查不充分,而3名男性患者(5%,P = 0.02)。结论:在我们的样本中,我们没有观察到基于性别的从出现到ERCP的时间延迟;然而,女性在第一次就诊时不太可能有足够的良性胰胆管疾病检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信