Xilan Gao , Jiuchen Liu , Nan Gai , Jihong Wang , Zhimin Yuan , Beihai Zhou , Rongrong Hou , Rongfang Yuan , Huilun Chen
{"title":"Induced crystallization techniques for fluoride removal from wastewater: Current developments and applications","authors":"Xilan Gao , Jiuchen Liu , Nan Gai , Jihong Wang , Zhimin Yuan , Beihai Zhou , Rongrong Hou , Rongfang Yuan , Huilun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jece.2025.117653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Excessive fluoride in wastewater poses significant risks to ecosystems and human health. Crystallization methods, including cryolite, calcium fluoride, and fluorapatite, demonstrate high fluoride removal efficiency (>90 %) under optimized conditions and offer the added benefit of resource recovery. Maintaining an optimal pH range (5−7) after chemical dosing enhances removal efficiency, though sulfate interference remains a limiting factor. CaF<sub>2</sub> and FAP typically crystallize at ambient temperature, with molar ratios of Ca/F= 0.6–0.7 and Ca:P:F= 10:4:1, respectively. In contrast, Na<sub>3</sub>AlF<sub>6</sub> crystallization performs best at 20–50°C with an Al/F ratio of 1:6. While the small-scale research on the crystallization methods of the three products is in full swing, only the CaF<sub>2</sub> crystallization has been comprehensively applied in pilot-scale trials and full-scale engineering. Na<sub>3</sub>AlF<sub>6</sub> crystallization is currently at the pilot-scale stage, whereas FAP crystallization has made no progress during the small-scale stage. Each method faces specific challenges. CaF<sub>2</sub> crystallization requires improvements in product purity and effluent quality. FAP crystallization needs effective phosphate control and cost-efficient reactor design. Na<sub>3</sub>AlF<sub>6</sub> must balance product purity with fluoride removal efficiency. Future research should prioritize the optimization of operational parameters, cost reduction, and the development of practical applications for novel approaches to facilitate large-scale implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","volume":"13 5","pages":"Article 117653"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213343725023498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Excessive fluoride in wastewater poses significant risks to ecosystems and human health. Crystallization methods, including cryolite, calcium fluoride, and fluorapatite, demonstrate high fluoride removal efficiency (>90 %) under optimized conditions and offer the added benefit of resource recovery. Maintaining an optimal pH range (5−7) after chemical dosing enhances removal efficiency, though sulfate interference remains a limiting factor. CaF2 and FAP typically crystallize at ambient temperature, with molar ratios of Ca/F= 0.6–0.7 and Ca:P:F= 10:4:1, respectively. In contrast, Na3AlF6 crystallization performs best at 20–50°C with an Al/F ratio of 1:6. While the small-scale research on the crystallization methods of the three products is in full swing, only the CaF2 crystallization has been comprehensively applied in pilot-scale trials and full-scale engineering. Na3AlF6 crystallization is currently at the pilot-scale stage, whereas FAP crystallization has made no progress during the small-scale stage. Each method faces specific challenges. CaF2 crystallization requires improvements in product purity and effluent quality. FAP crystallization needs effective phosphate control and cost-efficient reactor design. Na3AlF6 must balance product purity with fluoride removal efficiency. Future research should prioritize the optimization of operational parameters, cost reduction, and the development of practical applications for novel approaches to facilitate large-scale implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering (JECE) serves as a platform for the dissemination of original and innovative research focusing on the advancement of environmentally-friendly, sustainable technologies. JECE emphasizes the transition towards a carbon-neutral circular economy and a self-sufficient bio-based economy. Topics covered include soil, water, wastewater, and air decontamination; pollution monitoring, prevention, and control; advanced analytics, sensors, impact and risk assessment methodologies in environmental chemical engineering; resource recovery (water, nutrients, materials, energy); industrial ecology; valorization of waste streams; waste management (including e-waste); climate-water-energy-food nexus; novel materials for environmental, chemical, and energy applications; sustainability and environmental safety; water digitalization, water data science, and machine learning; process integration and intensification; recent developments in green chemistry for synthesis, catalysis, and energy; and original research on contaminants of emerging concern, persistent chemicals, and priority substances, including microplastics, nanoplastics, nanomaterials, micropollutants, antimicrobial resistance genes, and emerging pathogens (viruses, bacteria, parasites) of environmental significance.