Yass Rad , Arianna Prudenzi , Lucie Zernerova , Jennifer Gerson , Paul E. Flaxman
{"title":"Effects of workplace acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) programs on psychological flexibility's subprocesses: A systematic review","authors":"Yass Rad , Arianna Prudenzi , Lucie Zernerova , Jennifer Gerson , Paul E. Flaxman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite growing interest in applying <em>acceptance and commitment therapy</em> (ACT) in workplace settings, recent reviews raised doubt about the efficacy of staff-focused ACT programs for improving psychological flexibility. However, more specific processes targeted by these programs may have been obscured by aggregating effects across a wide array of psychological flexibility measures for meta-analytic review purposes. To investigate this possibility, the current systematic review examines workplace ACT intervention effects on psychological flexibility's subprocesses (i.e., contact with the present moment, acceptance, defusion, self-as-context, values, and committed action). The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (reference: CRD42022349446). The literature search identified 30 staff-focused ACT trials (18 controlled trials) that administered measures that could be mapped onto one or more psychological flexibility subprocess. Collectively, this body of research indicates strongest evidence for the effectiveness of workplace ACT programs for targeting defusion (observed across three types of defusion measures), and moderate yet consistent evidence that these programs increase mindful awareness and acceptance. Due to measurement issues, effects on values-based action have been less consistent overall. The next generation of workplace ACT research could be advanced by 1) adopting multidimensional psychological flexibility and inflexibility instruments, 2) subprocess-level multiple mediation testing, and 3) increasing methodological quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144725000468","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite growing interest in applying acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) in workplace settings, recent reviews raised doubt about the efficacy of staff-focused ACT programs for improving psychological flexibility. However, more specific processes targeted by these programs may have been obscured by aggregating effects across a wide array of psychological flexibility measures for meta-analytic review purposes. To investigate this possibility, the current systematic review examines workplace ACT intervention effects on psychological flexibility's subprocesses (i.e., contact with the present moment, acceptance, defusion, self-as-context, values, and committed action). The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (reference: CRD42022349446). The literature search identified 30 staff-focused ACT trials (18 controlled trials) that administered measures that could be mapped onto one or more psychological flexibility subprocess. Collectively, this body of research indicates strongest evidence for the effectiveness of workplace ACT programs for targeting defusion (observed across three types of defusion measures), and moderate yet consistent evidence that these programs increase mindful awareness and acceptance. Due to measurement issues, effects on values-based action have been less consistent overall. The next generation of workplace ACT research could be advanced by 1) adopting multidimensional psychological flexibility and inflexibility instruments, 2) subprocess-level multiple mediation testing, and 3) increasing methodological quality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS).
Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.