{"title":"Adolescents’ psychological flexibility and non-suicidal self-injury: Exploring between-person and within-person association","authors":"Dongyan Ding, Shuanghu Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most research on the relationship between psychological flexibility and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has been cross-sectional, focusing primarily on specific sub-dimensions of psychological flexibility (<em>e.g.</em>, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion) rather than its integrated constructs. To address these gaps, this study employed the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model (RI-CLPM) to investigate the within-person dynamic relationships between psychological flexibility (including six sub-dimensions) and NSSI. A total of 1119 adolescents (mean age = 13.15, SD = 1.26; 50.2 % female) participated in the study, with data collected at six-month intervals over a 1.5 year period. The study revealed that higher psychological flexibility and its six sub-dimensions (i.e., present awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self-as-context, values, and committed action) significantly predicted lower future NSSI over time, while NSSI did not significantly influence psychological flexibility or its sub-dimensions. Moreover, at the between-person level, committed action and cognitive defusion were negatively associated with NSSI. This research is the first to use RI-CLPM to differentiate within-person effects from between-person effects, providing a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic relationship between psychological flexibility (including its sub-dimensions) and NSSI. The findings offer a solid theoretical foundation for future interventions aimed at enhancing psychological flexibility to reduce NSSI among adolescents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221214472500047X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most research on the relationship between psychological flexibility and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has been cross-sectional, focusing primarily on specific sub-dimensions of psychological flexibility (e.g., experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion) rather than its integrated constructs. To address these gaps, this study employed the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model (RI-CLPM) to investigate the within-person dynamic relationships between psychological flexibility (including six sub-dimensions) and NSSI. A total of 1119 adolescents (mean age = 13.15, SD = 1.26; 50.2 % female) participated in the study, with data collected at six-month intervals over a 1.5 year period. The study revealed that higher psychological flexibility and its six sub-dimensions (i.e., present awareness, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self-as-context, values, and committed action) significantly predicted lower future NSSI over time, while NSSI did not significantly influence psychological flexibility or its sub-dimensions. Moreover, at the between-person level, committed action and cognitive defusion were negatively associated with NSSI. This research is the first to use RI-CLPM to differentiate within-person effects from between-person effects, providing a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic relationship between psychological flexibility (including its sub-dimensions) and NSSI. The findings offer a solid theoretical foundation for future interventions aimed at enhancing psychological flexibility to reduce NSSI among adolescents.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS).
Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.