Airin Triwahyuni , Hendriati Agustiani , Zahrotur Rusyda Hinduan , Robert A.C. Ruiter
{"title":"Measuring multidimensional loneliness in Indonesia: Adaptation and comparison of two loneliness scales","authors":"Airin Triwahyuni , Hendriati Agustiani , Zahrotur Rusyda Hinduan , Robert A.C. Ruiter","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness is closely linked to various mental health and physical health challenges. Despite numerous efforts, effective interventions for alleviating loneliness remain elusive, partly due to the lack of differentiation among different types of loneliness. The De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS) and the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults (SELSA-S) have proven to be valid and reliable tools for measuring emotional and social loneliness. However, Indonesian versions of these scales have not yet been developed or published. This study aims to provide preliminary evidence for which multidimensional loneliness measure is best suited for use with Indonesian adults. The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the DJGLS and SELSA-S scales were adapted for the Indonesian context through forward and backward translation, followed by content reviews by three experts and cognitive interviews with four university students. In the second phase, the psychometric properties of both scales were compared using data from 183 participants. Results indicated that the social subscales of the DJGLS and SELSA-S measured similar constructs, whereas their emotional subscales assessed distinct constructs. However, the DJGLS supported a hierarchical model, while the SELSA-S demonstrated a good fit for a three-factor related model. Based on these findings, both the DJGLS and SELSA-S are recommended for use with Indonesian university students to distinguish between emotional and social loneliness. Notably, the DJGLS is particularly suitable for studies requiring a general loneliness score alongside separate measures of emotional and social loneliness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Loneliness is closely linked to various mental health and physical health challenges. Despite numerous efforts, effective interventions for alleviating loneliness remain elusive, partly due to the lack of differentiation among different types of loneliness. The De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (DJGLS) and the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults (SELSA-S) have proven to be valid and reliable tools for measuring emotional and social loneliness. However, Indonesian versions of these scales have not yet been developed or published. This study aims to provide preliminary evidence for which multidimensional loneliness measure is best suited for use with Indonesian adults. The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the DJGLS and SELSA-S scales were adapted for the Indonesian context through forward and backward translation, followed by content reviews by three experts and cognitive interviews with four university students. In the second phase, the psychometric properties of both scales were compared using data from 183 participants. Results indicated that the social subscales of the DJGLS and SELSA-S measured similar constructs, whereas their emotional subscales assessed distinct constructs. However, the DJGLS supported a hierarchical model, while the SELSA-S demonstrated a good fit for a three-factor related model. Based on these findings, both the DJGLS and SELSA-S are recommended for use with Indonesian university students to distinguish between emotional and social loneliness. Notably, the DJGLS is particularly suitable for studies requiring a general loneliness score alongside separate measures of emotional and social loneliness.
孤独与各种心理健康和身体健康挑战密切相关。尽管做出了许多努力,但缓解孤独的有效干预措施仍然难以捉摸,部分原因是不同类型的孤独缺乏区分。De Jong Gierveld孤独量表(DJGLS)和成人社会与情感孤独量表(SELSA-S)已被证明是测量情感和社会孤独的有效和可靠的工具。但是,这些量表的印尼语版本尚未编制或出版。本研究旨在为多维孤独测量最适合印度尼西亚成年人使用提供初步证据。这项研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,通过前向和后向翻译,将DJGLS和SELSA-S量表改编为印尼语境,随后由三位专家进行内容审查,并对四名大学生进行认知访谈。在第二阶段,使用183名参与者的数据对两种量表的心理测量特性进行比较。结果表明,DJGLS和SELSA-S的社会分量表测量相似的构式,而其情绪分量表评估不同的构式。然而,DJGLS支持分层模型,而SELSA-S则很适合三因素相关模型。基于这些发现,DJGLS和SELSA-S都被推荐用于印尼大学生区分情感孤独和社会孤独。值得注意的是,DJGLS特别适用于需要一般孤独得分以及情感和社交孤独单独测量的研究。