ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Samuel F. Sears PhD , Samantha McCrary MS , Tiffany Andrade PA-C , Lauren Rousseau MPAS, PA-C, CCDS , Ann Kirkness RN , Allana Fantin CNE, MSc, BScN , Julie B. Shea MSN, NP
{"title":"ICD support groups: Are they still relevant now?","authors":"Samuel F. Sears PhD ,&nbsp;Samantha McCrary MS ,&nbsp;Tiffany Andrade PA-C ,&nbsp;Lauren Rousseau MPAS, PA-C, CCDS ,&nbsp;Ann Kirkness RN ,&nbsp;Allana Fantin CNE, MSc, BScN ,&nbsp;Julie B. Shea MSN, NP","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) save lives in patients at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, ICD shocks may prompt fear and anxiety and cause potential psychological trauma in patients. Since the beginning of the ICD’s broad use, healthcare professionals recognized the unique demands and experiences associated with this therapy. Some clinics responded by initiating patient-focused meetings broadly referred to as “ICD support groups” to address the mental health challenges in these patients. Decades of research have now underscored the importance of ICD patients’ psychological and behavioral processes and their associations with adverse health outcomes. ICD patients frequently report disease-specific mental health symptoms, including ICD shock anxiety, poor device acceptance, body image concerns, and decreased physical activity, that require unique clinical expertise from professionals to effectively manage. The original impetus for ICD support groups persists, but relatively few ICD support groups remain active. Online offerings may have taken on some of these functions. We suggest that ICD support groups remain a strategic intervention to address patient psychological and lifestyle concerns. This paper reviews the value of ICD support groups in the United States, Australia, and Canada and analyzes the current state and potential value of ICD support groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 874-879"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825001229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) save lives in patients at risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, ICD shocks may prompt fear and anxiety and cause potential psychological trauma in patients. Since the beginning of the ICD’s broad use, healthcare professionals recognized the unique demands and experiences associated with this therapy. Some clinics responded by initiating patient-focused meetings broadly referred to as “ICD support groups” to address the mental health challenges in these patients. Decades of research have now underscored the importance of ICD patients’ psychological and behavioral processes and their associations with adverse health outcomes. ICD patients frequently report disease-specific mental health symptoms, including ICD shock anxiety, poor device acceptance, body image concerns, and decreased physical activity, that require unique clinical expertise from professionals to effectively manage. The original impetus for ICD support groups persists, but relatively few ICD support groups remain active. Online offerings may have taken on some of these functions. We suggest that ICD support groups remain a strategic intervention to address patient psychological and lifestyle concerns. This paper reviews the value of ICD support groups in the United States, Australia, and Canada and analyzes the current state and potential value of ICD support groups.
ICD支持小组:它们现在仍然重要吗?
虽然植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)可以挽救可能危及生命的心律失常患者的生命,但ICD电击可能会引发恐惧和焦虑,并对患者造成潜在的心理创伤。自ICD开始广泛使用以来,医疗保健专业人员认识到与该疗法相关的独特需求和经验。一些诊所的回应是发起以病人为中心的会议,广泛地称为“ICD支持小组”,以解决这些病人的心理健康挑战。几十年的研究现在已经强调了ICD患者的心理和行为过程及其与不良健康结果的关联的重要性。ICD患者经常报告疾病特有的心理健康症状,包括ICD休克焦虑、设备接受度差、身体形象担忧和身体活动减少,这些需要专业人员的独特临床专业知识才能有效管理。ICD支持小组的最初动力仍然存在,但相对较少的ICD支持小组仍然活跃。在线产品可能已经承担了其中的一些功能。我们建议ICD支持小组仍然是解决患者心理和生活方式问题的战略干预措施。本文回顾了美国、澳大利亚和加拿大的ICD支持小组的价值,并分析了ICD支持小组的现状和潜在价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信