{"title":"Outcomes in diabetic vs nondiabetic patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure: A meta-analysis","authors":"Aman Goyal MD , Muhammad Daoud Tariq MBBS , Abdul Moiz Khan MBBS , Sonia Hurjkaliani MBBS , Areeba Ahsan MBBS , Humza Saeed MBBS , Rhea Trivedi MBBS , Gauranga Mahalwar MD , Mohamed Daoud MD , Agastya D. Belur MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure (HF) affects millions globally, causing severe symptoms and poor prognosis. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve heart function and quality of life in HF patients with electrical dyssynchrony, but its effectiveness in diabetic patients remains unclear due to the complexities associated with diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates the impact of diabetes mellitus on CRT by comparing outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic patients through a meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search identified studies on CRT in HF patients both with and without diabetes mellitus. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance set at <em>P <</em> .05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis of 13 observational studies involving 20,073 participants revealed that diabetic patients had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.34, <em>P <</em> .00001) and cardiovascular death (RR 1.49, <em>P =</em> .002) compared with nondiabetic patients. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the risk of stroke (RR 3.99, <em>P =</em> .05), myocardial infarction (RR 1.16, <em>P =</em> .30), changes in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (<em>P</em> = .22), LV end-systolic volume (<em>P</em> = .10), and LV end-diastolic volume (<em>P</em> = .63).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that diabetic patients undergoing CRT face a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared with nondiabetic patients. The increased mortality risk highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies, emphasizing the judicious use of CRT in diabetic patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 753-765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825000856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Heart failure (HF) affects millions globally, causing severe symptoms and poor prognosis. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve heart function and quality of life in HF patients with electrical dyssynchrony, but its effectiveness in diabetic patients remains unclear due to the complexities associated with diabetes.
Objective
This study evaluates the impact of diabetes mellitus on CRT by comparing outcomes between diabetic and nondiabetic patients through a meta-analysis.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search identified studies on CRT in HF patients both with and without diabetes mellitus. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance set at P < .05.
Results
Analysis of 13 observational studies involving 20,073 participants revealed that diabetic patients had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.34, P < .00001) and cardiovascular death (RR 1.49, P = .002) compared with nondiabetic patients. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the risk of stroke (RR 3.99, P = .05), myocardial infarction (RR 1.16, P = .30), changes in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (P = .22), LV end-systolic volume (P = .10), and LV end-diastolic volume (P = .63).
Conclusion
These findings suggest that diabetic patients undergoing CRT face a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared with nondiabetic patients. The increased mortality risk highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies, emphasizing the judicious use of CRT in diabetic patients.