Cormac Lynch , Pete Barbrook-Johnson , Pablo Salas Bravo , Jean-Francois Mercure , Femke Nijsse , Jin Qin , Roberto Pasqualino
{"title":"Tackling transformational change in climate policy appraisal: experiences and perceptions of United Kingdom policy analysts","authors":"Cormac Lynch , Pete Barbrook-Johnson , Pablo Salas Bravo , Jean-Francois Mercure , Femke Nijsse , Jin Qin , Roberto Pasqualino","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Progress in implementing climate policy in the United Kingdom consistent with the country's target to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 has been modest. This is despite the well-established physical risks of climate change, the UK's broadly accepted intention to act decisively, and the international recognition of the need for transformational climate action. Previous research suggests that the practical and theoretical limitations of existing decision-making frameworks and the accompanying economic tools may hinder transforming objectives into action. We explore how practitioners perceive the current assessment of transformational climate policies in the UK, drawing on interviews with government analysts from multiple departments. We identify various challenges including a status-quo bias and inadequate treatment of innovation and uncertainty that the recommended decision-making framework creates when applied to transformational climate policy proposals. Practitioners believed that new decision-making frameworks are needed to improve the assessment of transformational policies. These frameworks should support evidence-based decision-making in areas of deep uncertainty to enable government to avoid pessimism and status-quo biases. Frameworks should also find the balance between a detailed representation of transformational change and communicability to decision-makers to be effective. More economic modelling tools that view the economy as a dynamic system are also needed to provide decision-makers with more robust evidence on transformational change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104190"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Progress in implementing climate policy in the United Kingdom consistent with the country's target to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 has been modest. This is despite the well-established physical risks of climate change, the UK's broadly accepted intention to act decisively, and the international recognition of the need for transformational climate action. Previous research suggests that the practical and theoretical limitations of existing decision-making frameworks and the accompanying economic tools may hinder transforming objectives into action. We explore how practitioners perceive the current assessment of transformational climate policies in the UK, drawing on interviews with government analysts from multiple departments. We identify various challenges including a status-quo bias and inadequate treatment of innovation and uncertainty that the recommended decision-making framework creates when applied to transformational climate policy proposals. Practitioners believed that new decision-making frameworks are needed to improve the assessment of transformational policies. These frameworks should support evidence-based decision-making in areas of deep uncertainty to enable government to avoid pessimism and status-quo biases. Frameworks should also find the balance between a detailed representation of transformational change and communicability to decision-makers to be effective. More economic modelling tools that view the economy as a dynamic system are also needed to provide decision-makers with more robust evidence on transformational change.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.