Current practices in managing patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Results of an international survey

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
James Allred MD, FHRS , Amber Seiler NP, MSN, FHRS, CEPS, CCDS , Mark Lyons BSc , Paul Roberts MD , Angela Tsiperfal MSN , Laura van Heel BSN , Catherina Meijer MSc , Emmanuelle Nicolle MD , David Lanctin MPH , Eimo Martens MD
{"title":"Current practices in managing patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Results of an international survey","authors":"James Allred MD, FHRS ,&nbsp;Amber Seiler NP, MSN, FHRS, CEPS, CCDS ,&nbsp;Mark Lyons BSc ,&nbsp;Paul Roberts MD ,&nbsp;Angela Tsiperfal MSN ,&nbsp;Laura van Heel BSN ,&nbsp;Catherina Meijer MSc ,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Nicolle MD ,&nbsp;David Lanctin MPH ,&nbsp;Eimo Martens MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Managing patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly complicated with expanding populations and evolving technologies. While the 2023 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society consensus on management of remote device clinics provides recommendations, the adoption of these practices in real-world practice is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This survey of device clinic staff characterized the adoption and variability of CIED follow-up practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Delphi panel composed of U.S. and European Union clinical experts guided the research objectives, structure, and content of the survey. Once consensus was reached, the online survey (Qualtrics) was deployed in partnership with HRS through e-mail, social media posts, and at the HRX conference. An available case analysis was performed to handle missing data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 471 responses were collected from 44 countries, including 310 in the United States, 88 in Europe, and 73 in other regions. Broad representation was achieved with respect to staff role, years of experience, and clinic ownership. Most (71%) respondents reported being aware of the 2023 consensus statement. While the majority (77%–83%, depending on device type) reported using hybrid in-person and remote management for patients with therapeutic CIEDs, 89% to 91% reported scheduling routine office visits at least once per year, depending on device type, respectively. Only 50% of respondents reported a hybrid approach for insertable cardiac monitor patients, with 35% reporting remote-only follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Variable adoption was found for many practices recommended in the 2023 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society consensus. Future research should focus on optimal implementation of recommended practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 781-788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825000844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Managing patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly complicated with expanding populations and evolving technologies. While the 2023 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society consensus on management of remote device clinics provides recommendations, the adoption of these practices in real-world practice is unknown.

Objective

This survey of device clinic staff characterized the adoption and variability of CIED follow-up practices.

Methods

A Delphi panel composed of U.S. and European Union clinical experts guided the research objectives, structure, and content of the survey. Once consensus was reached, the online survey (Qualtrics) was deployed in partnership with HRS through e-mail, social media posts, and at the HRX conference. An available case analysis was performed to handle missing data.

Results

A total of 471 responses were collected from 44 countries, including 310 in the United States, 88 in Europe, and 73 in other regions. Broad representation was achieved with respect to staff role, years of experience, and clinic ownership. Most (71%) respondents reported being aware of the 2023 consensus statement. While the majority (77%–83%, depending on device type) reported using hybrid in-person and remote management for patients with therapeutic CIEDs, 89% to 91% reported scheduling routine office visits at least once per year, depending on device type, respectively. Only 50% of respondents reported a hybrid approach for insertable cardiac monitor patients, with 35% reporting remote-only follow-up.

Conclusion

Variable adoption was found for many practices recommended in the 2023 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society consensus. Future research should focus on optimal implementation of recommended practices.
管理心脏植入式电子装置患者的现行做法:一项国际调查的结果
随着人口的增长和技术的发展,心脏植入式电子装置(cied)患者的管理变得越来越复杂。虽然2023年心律协会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心律协会就远程设备诊所管理达成共识,但这些做法在实际实践中的采用尚不清楚。目的对器械临床工作人员进行调查,了解CIED随访实践的采用率和可变性。方法由美国和欧盟临床专家组成的德尔菲小组指导调查的研究目标、结构和内容。一旦达成共识,在线调查(Qualtrics)就通过电子邮件、社交媒体帖子和HRX会议与HRS合作部署。进行了可用的案例分析以处理丢失的数据。结果共收集了来自44个国家的471份问卷,其中美国310份,欧洲88份,其他地区73份。在员工角色、多年经验和诊所所有权方面取得了广泛的代表性。大多数(71%)受访者表示了解2023年共识声明。虽然大多数(77%-83%,取决于设备类型)报告对治疗性cied患者使用现场和远程混合管理,但89% - 91%报告每年至少安排一次常规办公室就诊,这分别取决于设备类型。只有50%的受访者报告了可插入式心脏监护仪患者的混合方法,35%的受访者报告了仅远程随访。结论2023年心律学会/欧洲心律学会/亚太心律学会/拉丁美洲心律学会共识中推荐的许多做法采用程度不一。未来的研究应侧重于推荐实践的最佳实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信