Cardiac implantable electronic devices in the setting of tricuspid valve intervention: Risks, options, extraction and future perspectives: A state-of-the-art review

IF 2.9 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alphonsus Liew MBBS , Nadeev Wijesuriya MBBS , Sandra Howell MBBS , Felicity de Vere MBBS , Joshua Wilcox MBBS , Tiffany Patterson PhD , Steven Niederer PhD , Christopher Aldo Rinaldi MD, FHRS
{"title":"Cardiac implantable electronic devices in the setting of tricuspid valve intervention: Risks, options, extraction and future perspectives: A state-of-the-art review","authors":"Alphonsus Liew MBBS ,&nbsp;Nadeev Wijesuriya MBBS ,&nbsp;Sandra Howell MBBS ,&nbsp;Felicity de Vere MBBS ,&nbsp;Joshua Wilcox MBBS ,&nbsp;Tiffany Patterson PhD ,&nbsp;Steven Niederer PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher Aldo Rinaldi MD, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased risk of heart failure and mortality. To address this, tricuspid valve (TV) interventions in the form of transcatheter and surgical TV procedures have rapidly emerged. TV interventions are associated with a significant risk of conduction system disease necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Limited data and current guidelines suggest that transvalvular PPM should be avoided to preserve the function of replaced or repaired TVs. With the rapid increase of transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve replacements in the last decade, the incidence of pre-existing PPM lead entrapment poses a clinical challenge in which lead extraction is indicated, particularly in the context of device infection. In this review article, we discuss the risks of conduction system disease associated with different TV interventions, the options for pacing, defibrillator therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy that spare the TV, and the management of pre-existing transvalvular pacing leads before TV intervention. Furthermore, we discuss the future perspectives in this field, including a completely leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator system, and propose an algorithm for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation during or after TV intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 6","pages":"Pages 880-892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased risk of heart failure and mortality. To address this, tricuspid valve (TV) interventions in the form of transcatheter and surgical TV procedures have rapidly emerged. TV interventions are associated with a significant risk of conduction system disease necessitating permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Limited data and current guidelines suggest that transvalvular PPM should be avoided to preserve the function of replaced or repaired TVs. With the rapid increase of transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve replacements in the last decade, the incidence of pre-existing PPM lead entrapment poses a clinical challenge in which lead extraction is indicated, particularly in the context of device infection. In this review article, we discuss the risks of conduction system disease associated with different TV interventions, the options for pacing, defibrillator therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy that spare the TV, and the management of pre-existing transvalvular pacing leads before TV intervention. Furthermore, we discuss the future perspectives in this field, including a completely leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator system, and propose an algorithm for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) implantation during or after TV intervention.

Abstract Image

心脏植入式电子装置在三尖瓣介入治疗中的应用:风险、选择、提取和未来展望:最新进展综述
三尖瓣反流与心力衰竭和死亡风险增加有关。为了解决这个问题,经导管和外科电视手术形式的三尖瓣(TV)干预迅速出现。电视干预与传导系统疾病的显著风险相关,需要植入永久性起搏器(PPM)。有限的数据和目前的指南建议,应避免经瓣膜PPM,以保持更换或修理的电视机的功能。在过去的十年中,随着经导管三尖瓣瓣内置换术的快速增加,预先存在的PPM铅夹带的发生率对临床提出了挑战,特别是在器械感染的情况下,需要拔出铅。在这篇综述文章中,我们讨论了与不同电视干预相关的传导系统疾病的风险,起搏、除颤器治疗和心脏再同步化治疗的选择,以及电视干预前预先存在的经瓣起搏导联的处理。此外,我们讨论了该领域的未来前景,包括完全无导线心脏再同步化治疗-除颤器系统,并提出了一种在电视干预期间或之后植入心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信