Medical-legal analysis of claims for patrimonial liability in primary health care and extra-hospital emergency services in the Community of Madrid

Fernando León Vázquez , Ángel Nieto Sánchez , Andrés S. Santiago-Sáez
{"title":"Medical-legal analysis of claims for patrimonial liability in primary health care and extra-hospital emergency services in the Community of Madrid","authors":"Fernando León Vázquez ,&nbsp;Ángel Nieto Sánchez ,&nbsp;Andrés S. Santiago-Sáez","doi":"10.1016/j.remle.2025.500453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Primary care (PC) and out-of-hospital emergency services (SUMMA112) are high-risk areas for malpractice claims due to their volume of activity and inherent uncertainty. Compensation claims that do not involve criminal liability require a preliminary administrative procedure. We analyzed the reasons and outcomes of these resolutions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This is a cross-sectional observational study of advisory opinions issued by the Legal Advisory Commission of the Community of Madrid regarding compensation claims for out-of-hospital healthcare liability between 2013 and 2022. The variables analyzed included administrative, clinical, judicial, temporal, and compensatory factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 616 rulings, 75 (12.2%) were related to out-of-hospital care: 43 (57.3%) in family medicine in PC and 28 (37.3%) in SUMMA112. Of these 42.7% were partially or fully upheld. The median compensation was €37,744 (range €600–€370,000). The 34 (45.3%) patients who died received more favorable outcomes (55.9% vs. 31.7%) with higher compensations (€47,900 vs. €22,900). The average delay between the claim and the opinion was 775 days. Reasons for claims included delayed or erroneous diagnosis in 42 cases (50,6%), treatment errors in 14 (16,9%), malpractice in 10 (12%), informed consent issues in 9 (10,8%) and adverse treatment effects in 7 (8,4%). The most frequent diseases were acute cardiovascular conditions (27%, including myocardial infarction and stroke), oncological diseases (16%), vaccine-related incidents (8%), and trauma (8%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Acute cardiovascular and oncological pathologies generated the highest number of claims. Diagnostic delay or error was the primary reason cited, often linked to the loss of opportunity. Less than half of the claims were upheld, with compensation amounts significantly lower than those requested, and higher amounts awarded in cases involving patient death. Resolution times exceeded two years.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101178,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 500453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445424925000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Primary care (PC) and out-of-hospital emergency services (SUMMA112) are high-risk areas for malpractice claims due to their volume of activity and inherent uncertainty. Compensation claims that do not involve criminal liability require a preliminary administrative procedure. We analyzed the reasons and outcomes of these resolutions.

Materials and methods

This is a cross-sectional observational study of advisory opinions issued by the Legal Advisory Commission of the Community of Madrid regarding compensation claims for out-of-hospital healthcare liability between 2013 and 2022. The variables analyzed included administrative, clinical, judicial, temporal, and compensatory factors.

Results

A total of 616 rulings, 75 (12.2%) were related to out-of-hospital care: 43 (57.3%) in family medicine in PC and 28 (37.3%) in SUMMA112. Of these 42.7% were partially or fully upheld. The median compensation was €37,744 (range €600–€370,000). The 34 (45.3%) patients who died received more favorable outcomes (55.9% vs. 31.7%) with higher compensations (€47,900 vs. €22,900). The average delay between the claim and the opinion was 775 days. Reasons for claims included delayed or erroneous diagnosis in 42 cases (50,6%), treatment errors in 14 (16,9%), malpractice in 10 (12%), informed consent issues in 9 (10,8%) and adverse treatment effects in 7 (8,4%). The most frequent diseases were acute cardiovascular conditions (27%, including myocardial infarction and stroke), oncological diseases (16%), vaccine-related incidents (8%), and trauma (8%).

Conclusions

Acute cardiovascular and oncological pathologies generated the highest number of claims. Diagnostic delay or error was the primary reason cited, often linked to the loss of opportunity. Less than half of the claims were upheld, with compensation amounts significantly lower than those requested, and higher amounts awarded in cases involving patient death. Resolution times exceeded two years.
马德里共同体初级保健和院外急救服务中遗传责任索赔的医疗-法律分析
初级保健(PC)和院外急救服务(SUMMA112)是医疗事故索赔的高风险领域,因为它们的活动量和固有的不确定性。不涉及刑事责任的赔偿要求需要初步行政程序。我们分析了这些决议产生的原因和结果。材料和方法这是一项对马德里共同体法律咨询委员会发布的关于2013年至2022年院外医疗责任索赔的咨询意见的横断面观察研究。分析的变量包括行政、临床、司法、时间和补偿因素。结果616例病例中,75例(12.2%)与院外护理相关,其中PC区43例(57.3%)与家庭医学相关,SUMMA112区28例(37.3%)与院外护理相关。其中42.7%部分或完全维持。薪酬中位数为37744欧元(600欧元至37万欧元)。34名(45.3%)死亡患者获得了更有利的结果(55.9%对31.7%),获得了更高的赔偿(47,900欧元对22,900欧元)。从提出索赔到发表意见的平均延迟时间为775天。索赔原因包括延误或误诊42例(50.6%),治疗错误14例(16.9%),医疗事故10例(12%),知情同意问题9例(10.8%),治疗不良反应7例(8.4%)。最常见的疾病是急性心血管疾病(27%,包括心肌梗死和中风)、肿瘤疾病(16%)、疫苗相关事件(8%)和创伤(8%)。结论急性心血管和肿瘤病变引起的索赔数量最多。诊断延误或错误是被引用的主要原因,通常与失去机会有关。不到一半的索赔得到支持,赔偿数额大大低于所要求的数额,而在涉及病人死亡的案件中,给予的赔偿数额更高。解决时间超过两年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信