Sexually inappropriate behavior in professional practice: Complaints to the Medical Ethics Tribunal (Uruguay, 2012–2024)

Evangelina Pérez Real, Jessica Filosi Piedrahíta, Natalia Bazán Hernández, Hugo Rodríguez Almada
{"title":"Sexually inappropriate behavior in professional practice: Complaints to the Medical Ethics Tribunal (Uruguay, 2012–2024)","authors":"Evangelina Pérez Real,&nbsp;Jessica Filosi Piedrahíta,&nbsp;Natalia Bazán Hernández,&nbsp;Hugo Rodríguez Almada","doi":"10.1016/j.remle.2025.500434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sexual violence is a globally prevalent phenomenon that impacts all sectors, including the medical profession. Several publications have raised concerns about inappropriate sexual behavior in professional practice. This is the first Uruguayan report, aimed at systematically organizing the complaints submitted regarding these sexual transgressions to the official tribunal responsible for the ethical oversight of the profession.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This is a retrospective, observational study examining the judgments issued since 2012.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Complaints related to this issue constituted 11.77 % of the total. All physicians reported were male. Psychiatrists and gynecologists were the most frequently cited specialists and received the most severe sanctions. Nearly all complainants were women. Many complaints involved physical contact and verbal abuse and almost all complaints resulted in sanctions against the physicians, including professional suspensions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The limited number of cases requires caution in conclusions. From the data we report, based on all reported cases, the following emerges: 1) Inappropriate sexual behaviors in professional settings are not exceptional. 2) They are underrepresented within the realm of complaints related to breaches of medical ethics. 3) These behaviors reflect gender inequality and are exacerbated by other asymmetries inherent in the clinical relationship and hierarchical structures. 4) Users of mental health and gynecological services are particularly vulnerable. 5) Despite evidentiary challenges, legal proceedings succeed in overcoming the presumption of innocence and sanctioning offenders. 6) A lack of national regulations with greater specificity for such transgressions was observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101178,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":"51 2","pages":"Article 500434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S244542492500024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sexual violence is a globally prevalent phenomenon that impacts all sectors, including the medical profession. Several publications have raised concerns about inappropriate sexual behavior in professional practice. This is the first Uruguayan report, aimed at systematically organizing the complaints submitted regarding these sexual transgressions to the official tribunal responsible for the ethical oversight of the profession.

Method

This is a retrospective, observational study examining the judgments issued since 2012.

Results

Complaints related to this issue constituted 11.77 % of the total. All physicians reported were male. Psychiatrists and gynecologists were the most frequently cited specialists and received the most severe sanctions. Nearly all complainants were women. Many complaints involved physical contact and verbal abuse and almost all complaints resulted in sanctions against the physicians, including professional suspensions.

Conclusions

The limited number of cases requires caution in conclusions. From the data we report, based on all reported cases, the following emerges: 1) Inappropriate sexual behaviors in professional settings are not exceptional. 2) They are underrepresented within the realm of complaints related to breaches of medical ethics. 3) These behaviors reflect gender inequality and are exacerbated by other asymmetries inherent in the clinical relationship and hierarchical structures. 4) Users of mental health and gynecological services are particularly vulnerable. 5) Despite evidentiary challenges, legal proceedings succeed in overcoming the presumption of innocence and sanctioning offenders. 6) A lack of national regulations with greater specificity for such transgressions was observed.
专业实践中的性不当行为:对医学道德法庭的投诉(乌拉圭,2012-2024)
性暴力是一种全球普遍现象,影响到所有部门,包括医疗行业。一些出版物对专业实践中的不当性行为提出了担忧。这是乌拉圭的第一份报告,目的是有系统地组织向负责职业道德监督的官方法庭提出的关于这些性侵犯的控诉。方法回顾性观察研究2012年以来的判决。结果与该问题相关的投诉占投诉总数的11.77 %。所有报告的医生均为男性。精神科医生和妇科医生是被引用次数最多的专家,受到的处罚也最严厉。几乎所有投诉者都是妇女。许多投诉涉及身体接触和言语虐待,几乎所有投诉都导致对医生的制裁,包括停职。结论病例数量有限,结论需谨慎。根据我们报告的数据,基于所有报告的案例,可以得出以下结论:1)职业环境中的不当性行为并不罕见。2)在与违反医疗道德有关的投诉领域,她们的代表人数不足。3)这些行为反映了性别不平等,并因临床关系和等级结构中固有的其他不对称而加剧。4)心理健康和妇科服务的使用者尤其脆弱。尽管存在证据方面的挑战,但法律程序成功地克服了无罪推定并制裁了违法者。6)对这类违法行为缺乏更具体的国家规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信