Yan Yin , Xiaoyu Zhang , Fengming Xi , Jiaoyue Wang , Longfei Bing , Qinqin Hu , Jie Lv , Zhanxiang Sun
{"title":"Emissions and reduction potential of greenhouse gas derived from facility cultivation production: Evidence from China","authors":"Yan Yin , Xiaoyu Zhang , Fengming Xi , Jiaoyue Wang , Longfei Bing , Qinqin Hu , Jie Lv , Zhanxiang Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facility cultivation, a high-input agricultural system critical for food security in China, exhibits disproportionately large greenhouse gas emissions compared to open-field agriculture, yet its emission dynamics remain underexplored. This study develops a comprehensive life-cycle accounting framework to quantify facility cultivation-related greenhouse gas emissions across China's three primary greenhouse types—plastic, solar, and multi-span greenhouses—from 2008 to 2020, while addressing previously overlooked emission sources including agricultural plastic films, climate-control energy use, CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization, and organic matter mineralization. Utilizing the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model and scenario analysis, we identify key drivers of emissions and evaluate mitigation potentials. Results revealed that facility cultivation emitted 122.05–371.96 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> equiv. yr<sup>−1</sup>, with emission intensities (83–226 t CO<sub>2</sub> equiv. ha<sup>−1</sup>). Soil organic matter decomposition and energy consumption were dominant sources, collectively contributing 67 % of total emissions. Decomposition analysis highlighted agricultural structure expansion (199.23 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> equiv.) and emission efficiency improvements (−213.96 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> equiv.) were primary promotive and mitigative drivers, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity underscored Liaoning Province's disproportionately high emissions, driven by coal-dependent heating, aging infrastructure, and policy incentives. Scenario projections demonstrated an 18.57 % reduction potential through integrated strategies such as clean energy adoption and cultivation structural optimization. These findings establish a refined analytical framework for spatially differentiated mitigation policies, directly supporting China's carbon neutrality roadmap while balancing agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Facility cultivation, a high-input agricultural system critical for food security in China, exhibits disproportionately large greenhouse gas emissions compared to open-field agriculture, yet its emission dynamics remain underexplored. This study develops a comprehensive life-cycle accounting framework to quantify facility cultivation-related greenhouse gas emissions across China's three primary greenhouse types—plastic, solar, and multi-span greenhouses—from 2008 to 2020, while addressing previously overlooked emission sources including agricultural plastic films, climate-control energy use, CO2 fertilization, and organic matter mineralization. Utilizing the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model and scenario analysis, we identify key drivers of emissions and evaluate mitigation potentials. Results revealed that facility cultivation emitted 122.05–371.96 Mt CO2 equiv. yr−1, with emission intensities (83–226 t CO2 equiv. ha−1). Soil organic matter decomposition and energy consumption were dominant sources, collectively contributing 67 % of total emissions. Decomposition analysis highlighted agricultural structure expansion (199.23 Mt CO2 equiv.) and emission efficiency improvements (−213.96 Mt CO2 equiv.) were primary promotive and mitigative drivers, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity underscored Liaoning Province's disproportionately high emissions, driven by coal-dependent heating, aging infrastructure, and policy incentives. Scenario projections demonstrated an 18.57 % reduction potential through integrated strategies such as clean energy adoption and cultivation structural optimization. These findings establish a refined analytical framework for spatially differentiated mitigation policies, directly supporting China's carbon neutrality roadmap while balancing agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.