Emissions and reduction potential of greenhouse gas derived from facility cultivation production: Evidence from China

IF 4.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yan Yin , Xiaoyu Zhang , Fengming Xi , Jiaoyue Wang , Longfei Bing , Qinqin Hu , Jie Lv , Zhanxiang Sun
{"title":"Emissions and reduction potential of greenhouse gas derived from facility cultivation production: Evidence from China","authors":"Yan Yin ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Fengming Xi ,&nbsp;Jiaoyue Wang ,&nbsp;Longfei Bing ,&nbsp;Qinqin Hu ,&nbsp;Jie Lv ,&nbsp;Zhanxiang Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facility cultivation, a high-input agricultural system critical for food security in China, exhibits disproportionately large greenhouse gas emissions compared to open-field agriculture, yet its emission dynamics remain underexplored. This study develops a comprehensive life-cycle accounting framework to quantify facility cultivation-related greenhouse gas emissions across China's three primary greenhouse types—plastic, solar, and multi-span greenhouses—from 2008 to 2020, while addressing previously overlooked emission sources including agricultural plastic films, climate-control energy use, CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization, and organic matter mineralization. Utilizing the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model and scenario analysis, we identify key drivers of emissions and evaluate mitigation potentials. Results revealed that facility cultivation emitted 122.05–371.96 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> equiv. yr<sup>−1</sup>, with emission intensities (83–226 t CO<sub>2</sub> equiv. ha<sup>−1</sup>). Soil organic matter decomposition and energy consumption were dominant sources, collectively contributing 67 % of total emissions. Decomposition analysis highlighted agricultural structure expansion (199.23 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> equiv.) and emission efficiency improvements (−213.96 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> equiv.) were primary promotive and mitigative drivers, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity underscored Liaoning Province's disproportionately high emissions, driven by coal-dependent heating, aging infrastructure, and policy incentives. Scenario projections demonstrated an 18.57 % reduction potential through integrated strategies such as clean energy adoption and cultivation structural optimization. These findings establish a refined analytical framework for spatially differentiated mitigation policies, directly supporting China's carbon neutrality roadmap while balancing agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101278"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211464525001447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facility cultivation, a high-input agricultural system critical for food security in China, exhibits disproportionately large greenhouse gas emissions compared to open-field agriculture, yet its emission dynamics remain underexplored. This study develops a comprehensive life-cycle accounting framework to quantify facility cultivation-related greenhouse gas emissions across China's three primary greenhouse types—plastic, solar, and multi-span greenhouses—from 2008 to 2020, while addressing previously overlooked emission sources including agricultural plastic films, climate-control energy use, CO2 fertilization, and organic matter mineralization. Utilizing the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model and scenario analysis, we identify key drivers of emissions and evaluate mitigation potentials. Results revealed that facility cultivation emitted 122.05–371.96 Mt CO2 equiv. yr−1, with emission intensities (83–226 t CO2 equiv. ha−1). Soil organic matter decomposition and energy consumption were dominant sources, collectively contributing 67 % of total emissions. Decomposition analysis highlighted agricultural structure expansion (199.23 Mt CO2 equiv.) and emission efficiency improvements (−213.96 Mt CO2 equiv.) were primary promotive and mitigative drivers, respectively. Spatial heterogeneity underscored Liaoning Province's disproportionately high emissions, driven by coal-dependent heating, aging infrastructure, and policy incentives. Scenario projections demonstrated an 18.57 % reduction potential through integrated strategies such as clean energy adoption and cultivation structural optimization. These findings establish a refined analytical framework for spatially differentiated mitigation policies, directly supporting China's carbon neutrality roadmap while balancing agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability.
设施栽培生产产生的温室气体排放和减排潜力:来自中国的证据
设施栽培是一种对中国粮食安全至关重要的高投入农业系统,与露天农业相比,其温室气体排放量大得不成比例,但其排放动态仍未得到充分探讨。本研究开发了一个全面的生命周期核算框架,以量化2008年至2020年中国三种主要温室类型(塑料、太阳能和多跨度温室)与设施栽培相关的温室气体排放,同时解决以前被忽视的排放源,包括农用塑料薄膜、气候控制能源使用、二氧化碳施肥和有机质矿化。利用对数平均分割指数模型和情景分析,我们确定了排放的主要驱动因素并评估了减缓潜力。结果表明:设施栽培排放122.05 ~ 371.96 Mt CO2当量/年−1,排放强度为83 ~ 226 t CO2当量/年−1;土壤有机质分解和能量消耗是主要排放源,占总排放量的67%。分解分析显示,农业结构扩张(- 2.923亿吨CO2当量)和排放效率提高(- 2.1396亿吨CO2当量)分别是主要的促进因素和减缓因素。空间异质性突出了辽宁省不成比例的高排放,这是由依赖煤炭的供暖、老化的基础设施和政策激励驱动的。情景预测表明,通过采用清洁能源和优化种植结构等综合战略,减少18.57%的潜力。这些发现为空间差异缓解政策建立了一个完善的分析框架,直接支持中国的碳中和路线图,同时平衡农业生产力和环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Development
Environmental Development Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action. Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers. All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信